Accuracy of the KOROT P3 Accurate automated auscultatory blood pressure measuring device for professional use in people with extra-large arms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the KOROT P3 Accurate (previously InBody BPBIO480KV) monitor, an automated auscultatory blood pressure (BP) measuring device developed for professional use, in people with extra-large arms according to the ISO81060-2 2018 protocol. METHODS: The KOROT P3 Accurate was tested in 37 subjects with upper-arm circumference ranging from >42 to 53 cm using a mercury sphygmomanometer coupled to a 20 × 40 cm tronco-conical cuff as the reference standard. RESULTS: The mean BP difference between the device and the observers' reference measurements was 1.2 ±â€…2.0 mmHg for systolic BP and 1.0 ±â€…2.0 mmHg for diastolic BP. These data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the protocol standard requirements (≤5 ±â€…8 mmHg). Also criterion 2 was satisfied being the standard deviations ± 1.7 mmHg for systolic BP and ± 1.6 for diastolic BP, well below the maximum values required by the protocol (±6.84/6.87 mmHg). Scatterplots of device-reference systolic and diastolic BP differences showed similar accuracy across the range of participants' BP, arm circumference and upper-arm slant angle. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the KOROT P3 Accurate monitor satisfied the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard requirements in a special population of people with extra-large arms ranging from >42 to 53 cm.

Both Moderate and Heavy Alcohol Use Amplify the Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Smoking in Young Patients with Hypertension.

AIM: To evaluate the association of alcohol and smoking combined with cardiovascular and renal events and investigate whether moderate and heavy alcohol consumption have a different impact on this association. METHODS: The study was conducted in 1208 young-to-middle-age stage 1 hypertensive patients. Subjects were classified into three categories of cigarette smoking and alcohol use, and the risk of adverse outcomes was assessed over a 17.4-year follow-up. RESULTS: In multivariable Cox models, smoking showed a different prognostic impact on alcohol drinkers and abstainers. In the former, an increase in the risk of cardiovascular and renal events was observed compared to nonsmokers (hazard ratio, 2.6, 95% CI, 1.5-4.3, p < 0.001), whereas in the latter, the risk did not achieve the level of statistical significance (p = 0.27) with a significant interaction between smoking and alcohol use (p < 0.001). Among the heavy smokers who also drank alcoholic beverages, the hazard ratio from the fully adjusted model was 4.3 (95% CI, 2.3-8.0, p < 0.0001). In the subjects with moderate alcohol consumption, the risk of smoking and alcohol combined was similar to that found in the whole population (hazard ratio, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.5-3.9, p < 0.001). Among the subjects with heavy alcohol consumption, the hazard ratio was 3.4 (95% CI, 1.3-8.6, p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the detrimental cardiovascular effects of smoking can be worsened by concomitant alcohol use. This synergistic effect occurs not only for heavy alcohol consumption but also for moderate use. Smokers should be aware of the increased risk associated with concomitant alcohol consumption.

Validation of the Hingmed DBP-01P clinical automatic blood pressure monitor provided with wide-range cuff, evaluated in a general population according to the ISO 81060-2:2018 protocol.

To determine the accuracy of the Hingmed DBP-01P monitor for clinical automatic blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 81060-2 2018 protocol. The DBP-01P was tested in 85 subjects from the general population (mean age, 69.9 years; 43 men) using a wide-range cuff for arm circumferences from 17 to 42 cm. The mean device-observer difference was 1.32 ± 3.18 mmHg for SBP and 0.78 ± 3.15 mmHg for DBP. These data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the protocol standard requirements (≤5 ± 8 mmHg). Also, criterion 2 was satisfied with the SDs of the 85 participants being well below the maximum values required by the protocol (6.80 and 6.89 mmHg for SBP and DBP pressure, respectively). These data show that the Hingmed BP monitor DBP-01P satisfied the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard requirements for a general population across a wide range of arm sizes using a single wide-range cuff.

Reproducibility and Predictive Value of White-Coat Hypertension in Young to Middle-Age Subjects.

(1) Aim. The aim of the study was to investigate the reproducibility of white-coat hypertension (WCH) and its predictive capacity for hypertension needing antihypertensive treatment (HT) in young to middle-age subjects. (2) Methods. We investigated 1096 subjects from the HARVEST. Office and 24 h blood pressures (BP) were measured at baseline and after 3 months. The reproducibility of WCH was evaluated with kappa statistics. The predictive capacity of WCH was tested in multivariate Cox models (N = 1050). (3) Results. Baseline WCH was confirmed at 3-month assessment in 33.3% of participants. Reproducibility was fair (0.27, 95%CI 0.20-0.37) for WCH, poor (0.14, 95%CI 0.09-0.19) for office hypertension, and moderate (0.47, 95%CI 0.41-0.53) for ambulatory hypertension. WCH assessed either at baseline or after 3 months (unstable WCH) was not a significant predictor of HT during 17.4 years of follow-up. However, participants who had WCH both at baseline and after 3 months (stable WCH) had an increased risk of HT compared to the normotensives (Hazard ratio, 1.50, 95%CI 1.06-2.1). (4) Conclusions. These results show that WCH has limited reproducibility. WCH diagnosed with two BP assessments but not with one showed an increased risk of future HT. Our data indicate that WCH should be identified with two sets of office and ambulatory BP measurements.

Criteria for a suitable reference cuff for validation studies of blood pressure measuring devices in people with arm circumference between 43 and 50 cm.

OBJECTIVE: Recommendations about the dimensions of the reference cuff for device validations in people with arm size >42 cm are still unavailable. The aim of this study was to identify the criteria for an appropriate reference cuff for validation studies in people with upper arm circumference between 43 and 50 cm. METHODS: In 20 adults with upper arm circumference between 43 and 50 cm (X-large group), 34 subjects with arm circumference between 37 and 42 cm and 78 subjects with arm circumference <37 cm cylindrical and tronco-conical cuffs were compared. In all participants, the pressure transmitted to the arm under the two cuffs was measured using a paper-thin pressure sensor. RESULTS: In the X-large group, all participants had an arm slant angle <86.0°. In this group, the difference between the pressure detected on the arm surface with the sensor using the cylindrical versus the tronco-conical cuff (13.5 mmHg) was larger than in the group with an arm circumference of 37-to 42 cm and the group with a circumference <37 cm (3.7 and 0.6 mmHg, respectively, P < 0.001 versus both). In the whole sample, the between-cuff pressure difference was proportional to the conical shape of the arm ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that in people with arm size between 43 and 50 cm the reference cuff for validation studies should have a conical shape with an 84-85° slant angle. To comply with current guidelines, an 18.5 × 37.0 cm bladder should be used which would allow proper cuffing in the large majority of subjects.

Use of Anthropometric Indices to Identify Appropriate Cuff Shapes for Blood Pressure Measurement: Normative Data for Adults.

BACKGROUND: Published evidence has shown that troncoconical cuffs improve blood pressure measurement accuracy in subjects with obesity. However, the exact shape of these cuffs according to arm size is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the anthropometric characteristics of the arm in a large population in order to identify the appropriate shape of the cuff for each arm. METHODS: The anthropometric characteristics were assessed in 729 adults with middle arm circumference ranging from 16 to 55 cm. Subjects were divided into classes of arm size and the upper-arm slant angle of the truncated cone was calculated. RESULTS: In the whole sample, the conical shape of the arm progressively increased with increasing arm circumference (r = 0.61, P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of the conical shape were arm circumference (P < 0.0001) and length (negative relationship, P < 0.0001), and female sex (P = 0.048). Women had a slightly more pronounced conical shape of the arm (P = 0.007) than men. However, the decrease in the slant angle across the arm-size classes showed a similar trend in men and women, and in a 2-way analysis of variance there was no interactive effect between arm size and sex on the conical shape of the arm (P = 0.11). On the basis of the slant angle calculated in each arm-size class, we provide dimensions for bladders that would appropriately fit the arm within a given circumference range. CONCLUSIONS: To properly fit the upper arm in patients with obesity cuffs should have a troncoconical shape. This study provides reference data according to arm size.

Accuracy of the oscillometric method for the measurement of heart rate at rest and during mild exercise.

OBJECTIVE: Whether oscillometric devices provide accurate measurements of heart rate (HR) is not known. Our aim was to determine the accuracy of an oscillometric device for the measurement of HR during rest and exercise. METHODS: The Microlife WatchBP O3, a monitor previously validated for blood pressure measurement, was tested in 36 individuals from the general population (mean age, 72.9 years; 18 men). HR was measured at rest and during stress testing on a cycle ergometer in order to increase HR by 15% or more. HR was computed from the oscillometric waves recorded during the deflation phase of the blood pressure measurement and was compared with HR measured by pulse palpation by two observers. RESULTS: At rest, the mean device-observer HR difference was 0.9 ±â€Š2.1 bpm. During exercise, the average HR increase was 20.3% and the mean device-observer difference was 0.6 ±â€Š2.6 bpm. The device-observer HR differences were all included within ±6 bpm both at rest and during exercise. Kappa statistics showed a very good agreement between device and observers both at rest (kappa scores, 0.82-0.88) and during exercise (kappa scores, 0.81 and 0.86). The device-observer HR differences were unrelated to the level of HR or to pulse pressure. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that the oscillometric technique is able to provide reliable HR measurements during rest and mild exercise. Whether evaluation of HR performance should be included during validation testing of automatic monitors should be established by regulatory bodies.

Validation of the blood pressure measurement technology used in the Novacor Diasys 3 (DIS-0001-00) upper arm device for ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to the requirements of the AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013 standard (for both a general study and a cardiac-stress study in adults) and of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the oscillometric blood pressure measurement technology of the Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00) blood pressure monitor, intended for ambulatory blood pressure measurement, when used with the recommended Standard (ACC-0213-00), Large (ACC-0214-00) and Paediatric (ACC-0215-00) cuffs. METHODS: The Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00) was evaluated according to the requirements of the AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013 standard, including an additional cardiac-stress study, a requirement for ambulatory blood pressure measurement devices. It was also validated according to the requirements of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. The protocol requirements for all thee studies were followed precisely. RESULTS: The Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00) fulfilled all of the requirements for a pass in each of the three studies. In the primary AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013 study, the Criterion 1 errors were +3.9 mmHg ± 2.9 mmHg for SBP and +3.4 ± 2.5 mmHg for DBP. CONCLUSION: The Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00), when used with the recommended cuffs, can be recommended for ambulatory blood pressure measurement in the adult population.

Validation of the blood pressure measurement technology used in the Novacor Diasys 3 Plus (DIP-0001-00) upper-arm device for ambulatory blood pressure measurement, according to AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2: 2013, ESH-IP 2010 and MEDDEV 2.7/1.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement technologies of the Novacor Diasys 3 Plus (model number DIP-0001-00) BP monitor, intended for ambulatory BP measurement when used with the recommended Standard Plus (ACC-0210-00), Large Plus (ACC-0211-00) and Paediatric Plus (ACC-0212-00) cuffs. METHODS: The auscultatory measurement technology Novacor Diasys 3 Plus (model number DIP-0001-00) was evaluated according to the requirements of the AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013 standard, including an additional cardiac-stress study, a requirement for ambulatory BP measurement devices. It was also validated according to the requirements of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. The oscillometric measurement technology was compared to that of the Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00) according to the equivalence requirements of MEDDEV 2.7/1 rev 4. The protocol requirements for all three studies and the equivalence were followed precisely. RESULTS: The Novacor Diasys 3 Plus (model number DIP-0001-00) fulfilled all of the requirements for a pass in each of the three studies of the auscultatory measurement technology. In the primary AAMI/ANSI/ISO 81060-2:2013 study, the criterion 1 errors were + 3.6 ± 2.7 mmHg for SBP and + 3.0 ± 2.7 mmHg for DBP. It was also proven to be equivalent to the Novacor Diasys 3 (model number DIS-0001-00) with respect to the oscillometric measurement technology CONCLUSION: The Novacor Diasys 3 Plus (model number DIP-0001-00), when used with the recommended cuffs, can be recommended for ambulatory BP measurement in the adult population.

Accuracy of the WatchBP O3 device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring according to the new criteria of the ISO81060-2 2018 protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of the Microlife WatchBP O3 monitor for ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement according to the new ISO81060-2 2018 protocol. METHODS: The WatchBP O3 was first tested in 97 subjects from the general population (mean age, 71.3 years; 48 men) using four cuffs of different sizes. In a second study, 36 subjects (mean age, 72.9 years; 18 men) underwent stress testing on a cycle ergometer in order to increase their heart rate by 15% or more. RESULTS: In the general population, the mean device-observer difference was 1.3 ± 3.2 mmHg for systolic BP and was 0.7 ± 3.2 mmHg for diastolic BP. These data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the protocol standard requirements (≤5 ± 8 mmHg). Also, criterion 2 was satisfied being the SDs of the 97 participants well below the maximum values required by the protocol (6.82 and 6.90 mmHg, respectively). During the ambulatory monitoring study, the average heart rate increase was 20.3% (range 15.4-28.9%). The mean device-observer difference was 1.5 ± 2.8 mmHg for systolic BP and was 1.7 ± 2.6 mmHg for diastolic BP. Also, these data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that the Microlife WatchBP O3 monitor satisfied the ISO 81060-2:2018 standard requirements for a general population across a wide range of arm sizes and that also the protocol criteria for validation of devices intended for ambulatory BP monitoring were fulfilled.

Short-Term but not Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability Is a Predictor of Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Young Untreated Hypertensives.

BACKGROUND: Whether blood pressure variability (BPV) measured with ambulatory monitoring (short-term BPV) or computed from office visits (long-term BPV) are related to each other and carry similar prognostic information is not well known. We investigated the independent determinants of short-term and long-term BPVs and their predictive capacity for the development of major adverse cardiovascular and renal events (MACEs) in a cohort of young hypertensive participants. METHODS: Long-term BPV was calculated as visit-to-visit SD and average real variability from office blood pressure (BP) measured during 7 visits, within 1 year. Short-term BPV was calculated as weighted 24-hour SD and coefficient of variation. Hazard ratios (HRs) for risk of MACE were computed from multivariable Cox regressions. RESULTS: 1,167 participants were examined; mean age was 33.1 ± 8.5 years. Variables independently associated with 24-hour systolic SD were 24-hour systolic BP, low physical activity, smoking, baseline office pulse pressure, systolic BP dipping, and diastolic white coat effect, while those associated with long-term BPV were mean systolic BP, age, female gender, and baseline office heart rate. During a median follow-up of 17.4 years 75 MACEs occurred. In Cox analysis only short-term BPV resulted a significant predictor of MACE (HR, 1.31 (1.07-1.59); P = 0.0086), while no index of long-term BPV was independently associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In young hypertensive subjects only short-term BPV resulted a significant predictor of MACE on top of traditional ambulatory BP monitoring parameters. Whether reduction of short-term BPV with therapy may reduce the cardiovascular risk independently from the effects on 24-hour BP is a matter for future research.

Effect of the shape of the cuff on blood pressure measurement in people with large arms.

Purpose: Previous data suggest that tronco-conical cuffs should be used for accurate blood pressure (BP) measurement in the obese. However, not only arm size but also its shape may affect the accuracy of BP measurement when a cylindrical cuff is used.Methods: In 197 subjects with arm circumference >32 cm, and 157 subjects with arm circumference ≤ 32 cm, the upper-arm was considered as formed from two truncated cones and the frustum slant angles of the proximal (upper angle) and distal (middle angle) truncated cones were measured. Five cylindrical and five tronco-conical cuffs of appropriate size in relation to arm circumference were used.Results: In the group with large arm, the upper slant angle was greater than the middle angle (86.5 ± 1.7° versus 84.7 ± 2.3°), whereas in the group with normal arm the two angles were similar. In the former group, the cylindrical cuff overestimated BP by 2.5 ± 5.4/1.7 ± 4.7 mmHg, whereas in the latter negligible between-cuff BP discrepancies were found. In the whole sample, BP discrepancies between the cylindrical and the tronco-conical cuffs correlated with both arm size and shape, considered as the difference between the upper and middle slant angles (all p < 0.0001). Among the participants with large arm, the between-cuff BP discrepancies increased progressively with increasing upper-middle angle difference (3.75 ± 0.38/2.78 ± 0.32 mmHg for the top tertile, p < 0.001/<0.001).Conclusions: These data indicate that in people with large upper arms, the tronco-conical shape of the arm is more pronounced on the lower than the upper half, a feature that amplifies the BP measurement error when cylindrical cuffs are used.

Short-term blood pressure variability outweighs average 24-h blood pressure in the prediction of cardiovascular events in hypertension of the young.

OBJECTIVE: The association of short-term blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) with cardiovascular events (CVEs) is controversial. Aim of this study was to investigate whether BPV measured as weighted 24-h SD was associated with CVE in a prospective cohort study of young patients screened for stage 1 hypertension. METHODS: We performed 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring in 1206 participants aged 33.1 ±â€Š8.5 years, untreated at baseline examination. Participants were divided into two categories with low (<12.8 mmHg) or high (≥12.8 mmHg) SBPV. Hazard ratios for CVE associated with BPV expressed either as continuous or categorical variable were computed from multivariable Cox models. RESULTS: During 15.4 ±â€Š7.4 years of follow-up there were 69 fatal and nonfatal CVE. In multivariable Cox models, high SBPV was an independent predictors of CVE [2.75 (1.65-4.58); P = 0.0001] and of coronary events [3.84 (2.01-7.35), P < 0.0001]. Inclusion in the model of development of hypertension requiring treatment during the follow-up, did not reduce the strength of the associations. Addition of SBPV to fully adjusted models had significant impact on risk reclassification and integrated discrimination (relative integrated discrimination improvement for BPV as continuous variable: 13.5%, P = 0.045, and for BPV as categorical variable: 26.6%, P = 0.001). When the coefficient of variation was used as BPV metric similar results were obtained. Of note, in all Cox models average 24-h BP was no longer an independent predictor of outcome after BPV was included. CONCLUSION: Short-term BPV adds to the risk stratification for cardiovascular events in young-to-middle-age patients screened for stage 1 hypertension over and above traditional 24-h ambulatory monitoring indexes.

Validation of the Hingmed WBP-02A device for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010.

The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the Hingmed WBP-02A device for ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH-IP). Device evaluation was carried out in 33 patients. The mean age was 69.8±13.8 years, the mean systolic BP was 137.6±27.0 mmHg (range: 96-172), the mean diastolic BP was 86.7±20.1 mmHg (range: 48-124) and the mean arm circumference was 30.1±6.2 cm (range: 20-43). The protocol requirements were followed precisely. Four different cuffs, small, standard, large, and extra-large were used. The device comfortably passed all ESH-IP requirements, as 84 out of 99 device-observer systolic BP differences and 97 of 99 diastolic BP differences were within ±5 mmHg thereby fulfilling the standards of the protocol. Device-observer BP differences were unrelated to arm circumference. These data show that the Hingmed WBP-02A device for ambulatory BP monitoring met the requirements for validation by the ESH-IP and can be recommended for clinical use in the adult population.

Only troncoconical cuffs can provide accurate blood pressure measurements in people with severe obesity.

OBJECTIVE: Rectangular (cylindrical) cuffs and bladders are currently used for blood pressure (BP) measurement at the upper arm. However, large arms have a troncoconical shape, which make cylindrical cuffs potentially unsuitable. Aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the shape of the cuff on BP measurement in very obese participants. METHODS: In 33 participants with upper arm mid-circumference at least 42 cm and 33 participants of control, cylindrical and troncoconical cuffs of appropriate size were compared. In addition, in the obese participants, the pressure transmitted to the arm under the cuffs was measured at five cuff pressure levels using a paper-thin pressure sensor. RESULTS: In all obese participants, the upper arm shape was troncoconical (mean ±â€ŠSD slant angle, 84.1 ±â€Š1.4°). In this group, SBP and DBP differences between the troncoconical and the cylindrical cuff were -5.3 ±â€Š4.0 and -3.0 ±â€Š4.3 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001/=0.01 versus controls). In the obese participants of the top BP quintile, the between-cuff SBP difference was -9.1 ±â€Š5.1 mmHg. Arm slant angle was an independent predictor of the between-cuff SBP discrepancy (P = 0.003). When the cylindrical cuff was used, measurement with the pressure sensor showed a marked disagreement between the pressure in the cuff and the pressure transmitted to the arm (mean difference, -10.2 ±â€Š5.2 mmHg) a difference, which increased with increasing level of the pressure pumped in the cuff. CONCLUSION: In very obese people, cylindrical cuffs overestimate BP chiefly in people with high SBP and thus only troncoconical cuffs should be used.

Clinical characteristics and risk of hypertension needing treatment in young patients with systolic hypertension identified with ambulatory monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical significance of isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) in youth is controversial. One main confounding factor is the strong white-coat effect often observed in ISH patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the risk of hypertension needing pharmacological treatment in ISH identified with ambulatory 24-h blood pressure (24-h BP). METHODS: We examined 1206, 18-45-year-old participants from the Hypertension and Ambulatory Recording VEnetia STudy. Based on 24-h BP, 269 participants were normotensive, 209 had ISH, 277 had isolated diastolic hypertension, and 451 had systolic-diastolic hypertension. The predictive role of ISH for incident hypertension was evaluated in Cox survival analyses, adjusting for risk factors and confounders. RESULTS: ISH participants were more frequently young men active in sports, with lower heart rate and cholesterol. During a 6.9-year follow-up, 61.1% of participants developed hypertension. ISH participants had a nonsignificant increase in risk of hypertension compared with normotensive (reference group). In contrast, participants with diastolic hypertension (1.44; 1.13-1.85) or systolic-diastolic hypertension (2.04; 1.59-2.64) had a significant increase in risk. When the ISH participants were divided according to whether 24-h mean BP was normal (<97 mmHg) or high, ISH patients with normal mean BP had no increase in risk (1.01; 0.73-1.40), whereas those with high mean BP had a significant increase in risk (1.70; 1.16-2.49). CONCLUSION: These data obtained with ambulatory BP monitoring show that in ISH people younger than 45 years, only mean BP is a predictor of future hypertension needing treatment, whereas the ISH status per se does not necessarily imply an increase in risk.

Accuracy of the WatchBP office ABI device for office blood pressure measurement over a wide range of arm sizes.

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of the WatchBP Office ABI monitor for office blood pressure measurement over a wide range of arm circumferences using the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 protocol. The device accuracy was tested in 88 participants whose mean±SD age was 54.5±17.6 years, whose arm circumference was 30.6±8.3 cm (range: 15-46 cm), and whose entry blood pressure (BP) was 138.3±23.4 mmHg for systolic and 83.7±14.6 mmHg for diastolic BP. Four cuffs (small, standard, large, and extra-large) suitable for arm circumferences ranging from 14.0 to 52.0 cm were used. The mean device-observer difference in the 264 separate BP data pairs was 0.7±3.8 mmHg for systolic BP and was 0.0±3.7 mmHg for diastolic BP. These data were in agreement with criterion 1 of the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 standard requirements (≤5±8 mmHg). Moreover, criterion 2 was satisfied, the mean±SD device-observer difference of the 88 participants being 0.7±3.1 and 0.0±3.2 mmHg, respectively, for systolic and diastolic BP. Good agreement between observer and device was present across the whole range of arm circumferences. These data show that the Microlife WatchBP Office ABI monitor satisfied the ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2013 standard requirements across a wide range of arm sizes.

Low night-time heart rate is longitudinally associated with lower augmentation index and central systolic blood pressure in hypertension.

PURPOSE: Several studies have shown that the augmentation index (AIx) is negatively correlated with heart rate (HR). This led some authors to claim that the use of HR-lowering drugs may be detrimental in hypertension. The aim of this study was to assess the longitudinal and cross-sectional relationships of HR with AIx and central blood pressure (BP) in 346 subjects from the HARVEST (mean age 30.7 ± 8.5 years). METHODS: At baseline, HR was measured with 24-h ambulatory recording. Central hemodynamics were evaluated with Specaway DAT system after a median of 8.0 years from baseline. In multivariate linear regression analyses, AIx and central systolic BP were used as dependent variables and night-time HR or office HR as predictors adjusting for several risk factors and confounders. RESULTS: In fully adjusted models, baseline night-time HR was a significant positive predictor of AIx (p < 0.001) and central BP (p = 0.014) measured 8 years later. Adjusted office HR measured at the time of arterial distensibility assessment was inversely correlated with AIx (p = 0.001) a relationship which was attenuated after physical activity (p = 0.004) and left ventricular ejection time (p = 0.015) were taken into account. In addition, office HR was inversely correlated with central BP (p = 0.039) a relationship which was no longer significant after physical activity and ejection time were accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that HR measured during sleep is longitudinally associated with AIx and central BP. Thus, low HR in the long term may have beneficial effects on central hemodynamics and the wall properties of the large arteries in hypertension.

Office Pulse Pressure Is a Predictor of Favorable Outcome in Young- to Middle-Aged Subjects With Stage 1 Hypertension.

The role of pulse pressure in young individuals remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical significance of elevated pulse pressure in young- to middle-aged subjects screened for stage 1 hypertension. We examined 1241 subjects (mean age, 33.1±8.4 years) from the HARVEST (Hypertension Ambulatory Recording Venetia Study), during a median follow-up of 12.1 years. To evaluate the predictive value of pulse pressure and mean blood pressure for future hypertension needing treatment and for cardiovascular events, participants were grouped into pressure tertiles. Significant determinants of pulse pressure were male sex (P=0.029), younger age (P<0.001), physical activity (P=0.003), heart rate (P<0.001), systolic white coat effect (P<0.001), and stroke volume (n=829; P<0.001). During follow-up, 65.1% of participants developed hypertension requiring pharmacological treatment and 5.1% experienced a cardiovascular event. Participants in the highest pulse pressure tertile had a reduced risk of incident hypertension compared with those of the bottom tertile (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.91; P=0.003). In contrast, participants in the top mean blood pressure tertile had an increase in risk (1.91; 1.57-2.33; P<0.001). In addition, participants in the highest pulse pressure tertile had a reduced risk of cardiovascular events (0.35; 0.17-0.73; P=0.005) and those in the top mean blood pressure tertile had an increase in risk (3.06; 1.32-7.09; P=0.009). Our data show that in subjects <45 years, only mean blood pressure is a predictor of adverse outcome whereas high pulse pressure even carries a reduced risk.