Cortical pedicle screw placement in lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: A cadaveric study.

BACKGROUND: Cortical pedicle screw placement is an attractive technique in terms of both fixation strength and less invasiveness. However, to insert the screw with penetrating cortical bone on the ideal trajectory is technically demanding. The use of three-dimensional (3D) patient-matched guides may facilitate the use of this technique. PURPOSE: To examine the accuracy of cortical screw placement using a patient-matched targeting guide with a cadaveric study assessing the accuracy. METHODS: The 3D planning of the pedicle screw placement, including the location at which the screw would pass through the center of the pedicle, sagittal/transverse trajectory (angle), length, and diameter, was developed using 3D CAD design software. Three-dimensional guides based on the preoperative planning were created for three cadaveric specimens (L1 to S1, 36 pedicles). Screws (n = 18) and pins (n = 18) were placed using K-wire or drill-based guides, without X-ray exposure. Actual positioning was compared to the preoperative plan by superimposing the inserted screws/pins based on postoperative CT. The placement accuracy was graded based on the degree of perforation of the pedicle by the pedicle screw or pin using an acceptance criterion (no perforation; Grade A, 0-2 mm; Grade B, 2-4 mm; and Grade C, >4 mm). The mean deviation between the planned and inserted screw positions on the coronal plane at the midpoint of the pedicle was compared to the accuracy of screw guide for traditional pedicle screw trajectory (0.70 mm). RESULTS: Of 35 evaluated screws and pins, 32 (91.4%) were inserted completely inside the pedicle. All pedicle perforation was within 2 mm. The mean deviation from the plan at the midpoint of pedicle was 0.66 mm; thus, the accuracy was within the predefined criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical pedicle screw placement using 3D-patient matched guides is accurate. Further clinical studies are required to confirm the radiographic and clinical effects.

Biomechanical analysis of cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Interbody fusions using intervertebral cages have become increasingly common in spinal surgery. Computational simulations were conducted in order to compare different cage designs in terms of their biomechanical interaction with the spinal structures. Differences in cage design and surgical technique may significantly affect the biomechanics of the fused spine segment, but little knowledge is available on this topic. In the present study, four 3D finite element models were developed, reproducing the human L4-L5 spinal unit in intact condition and after implantation of three different cage models. The intact model consisted of two vertebral bodies and relevant laminae, facet joints, main ligaments and disc. The instrumented models reproduced the post-operative conditions resulting after implant of the different cages. The three considered devices were hollow threaded titanium cages, the BAK (Zimmer Centerpulse, Warsaw, IN, USA), the Interfix and the Interfix Fly (both by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, USA). Simulations were run imposing various loading conditions, under a constant compressive preload. A great increase in the stiffness induced on the spinal segment by all cages was observed in all the considered loading cases. Stress distributions on the bony surface were evaluated and discussed. The differences observed between the biomechanics of the instrumented models were associated with the geometrical and surgical features of the devices.