Impact of development and recent-onset epilepsy on language dominance.

OBJECTIVE: Reorganization of the language network from typically left-lateralized frontotemporal regions to bilaterally distributed or right-lateralized networks occurs in anywhere from 25%-30% of patients with focal epilepsy. In patients who have been recently diagnosed with epilepsy, an important question remains as to whether it is the presence of seizures or the underlying epilepsy etiology that leads to atypical language representations. This question becomes even more interesting in pediatric samples, where the typical developmental processes of the language network may confer more variability and plasticity in the language network. We assessed a carefully selected cohort of children with recent-onset epilepsy to examine whether it is the effects of seizures or their underlying cause that leads to atypical language lateralization. METHODS: We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare language laterality in children with recently diagnosed focal unaware epilepsy and age-matched controls. Age at epilepsy onset (age 4 to 6 years vs age 7 to 12 years) was also examined to determine if age at onset influenced laterality. RESULTS: The majority of recent-onset patients and controls exhibited left-lateralized language. There was a significant interaction such that the relationship between epilepsy duration and laterality differed by age at onset. In children with onset after age 6, a longer duration of epilepsy was associated with less left-lateralized language dominance. In contrast, in children with onset between 4 and 6 years of age, a longer duration of epilepsy was not associated with less left language dominance. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results demonstrate that although language remained largely left-lateralized in children recently diagnosed with epilepsy, the impact of seizure duration depended on age at onset, indicating that the timing of developmental and disease factors are important in determining language dominance.

Functional Connectivity as a Potential Mechanism for Language Plasticity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Task fMRI is a clinical tool for language lateralization, but has limitations, and cannot provide information about network-level plasticity. Additional methods are needed to improve the precision of presurgical language mapping. We investigate language resting-state functional connectivity (RS fMRI; FC) in typically developing children (TD) and children with epilepsy. Our objectives were to (1) understand how FC components differ between TD children and those with epilepsy; (2) elucidate how the location of disease (frontal/temporal epilepsy foci) affects FC; and (3) investigate the relationship between age and FC. METHODS: Our sample included 55 TD children (mean age 12 years, range 7-18) and 31 patients with focal epilepsy (mean age 13 years, range 7-18). All participants underwent RS fMRI. Using a bilateral canonical language map as target, vertex-wise intrahemispheric FC map and interhemispheric FC map for each participant were computed and thresholded at top 10% to compute an FC laterality index (FCLI; [(L - R)/(L + R)]) of the frontal and temporal regions for both integration (intrahemispheric FC; FCLIi) and segregation (interhemispheric FC; FCLIs) maps. RESULTS: We found FC differences in the developing language network based on disease, seizure foci location, and age. Frontal and temporal FCLIi was different between groups (t[84] = 2.82, p < 0.01; t[84] = 4.68, p < 0.01, respectively). Frontal epilepsy foci had the largest differences from TD (Cohen d frontal FCLIi = 0.84, FCLIs = 0.51; temporal FCLIi = 1.29). Development and disease have opposing influences on the laterality of FC based on groups. In the frontal foci group, FCLIi decreased with age (r = -0.42), whereas in the temporal foci group, FCLIi increased with age (r = 0.40). Within the epilepsy group, increases in right frontal integration FCLI relates to increased right frontal task activation in our mostly left language dominant group (r = 0.52, p < 0.01). Language network connectivity is associated with higher verbal intelligence in children with epilepsy (r = 0.45, p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: These findings lend preliminary evidence that FC reflects network plasticity in the form of adaptation and compensation, or the ability to recruit support and reallocate resources within and outside of the traditional network to compensate for disease. FC expands on task-based fMRI and provides complementary and potentially useful information about the language network that is not captured using task-based fMRI alone.

Functional connectivity hemispheric contrast (FC-HC): A new metric for language mapping.

Development of a task-free method for presurgical mapping of language function is important for use in young or cognitively impaired patients. Resting state connectivity fMRI (RS-fMRI) is a task-free method that may be used to identify cognitive networks. We developed a voxelwise RS-fMRI metric, Functional Connectivity Hemispheric Contrast (FC-HC), to map the language network and determine language laterality through comparison of within-hemispheric language network connections (Integration) to cross-hemispheric connections (Segregation). For the first time, we demonstrated robustness and efficacy of a RS-fMRI metric to map language networks across five groups (total N = 243) that differed in MRI scanning parameters, fMRI scanning protocols, age, and development (typical vs pediatric epilepsy). The resting state FC-HC maps for the healthy pediatric and adult groups showed higher values in the left hemisphere, and had high agreement with standard task language fMRI; in contrast, the epilepsy patient group map was bilateral. FC-HC has strong but not perfect agreement with task fMRI and thus, may reflect related and complementary information about language plasticity and compensation.

fMRI prediction of naming change after adult temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Activation matters.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to predict language deficits after epilepsy surgery. In addition to evaluating surgical factors examined previously, we determined the impact of the extent of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation that was resected on naming ability. METHOD: Thirty-five adults (mean age 37.5 ± 10.9 years, 13 male) with temporal lobe epilepsy completed a preoperative fMRI auditory description decision task, which reliably activates frontal and temporal language networks. Patients underwent temporal lobe resections (20 left resection). The Boston Naming Test (BNT) was used to determine language functioning before and after surgery. Language dominance was determined for Broca and Wernicke area (WA) by calculating a laterality index following statistical parametric mapping processing. We used an innovative method to generate anatomic resection masks automatically from pre- and postoperative MRI tissue map comparison. This mask provided the following: (a) resection volume; (b) overlap between resection and preoperative activation; and (c) overlap between resection and WA. We examined postoperative language change predictors using stepwise linear regression. Predictors included parameters described above as well as age at seizure onset (ASO), preoperative BNT score, and resection side and its relationship to language dominance. RESULTS: Seven of 35 adults had significant naming decline (6 dominant-side resections). The final regression model predicted 38% of the naming score change variance (adjusted r2  = 0.28, P = 0.012). The percentage of top 10% fMRI activation resected (P = 0.017) was the most significant contributor. Other factors in the model included WA LI, ASO, volume of WA resected, and WA LI absolute value (extent of laterality). SIGNIFICANCE: Resection of fMRI activation during a word-definition decision task is an important factor for postoperative change in naming ability, along with other previously reported predictors. Currently, many centers establish language dominance using fMRI. Our results suggest that the amount of the top 10% of language fMRI activation in the intended resection area provides additional predictive power and should be considered when planning surgical resection.