Clinical and echocardiographic results of the MEMO 4D semi-rigid annuloplasty ring.

BACKGROUND: Mitral regurgitation is a frequent valvular disease, with an increasing prevalence. We analyzed the short-term outcomes of mitral valve repair procedures conducted in our clinic using a new semirigid annuloplasty ring featuring a gradual saddle shape design. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed mitral valve repair surgeries performed at our Institution between December 2019 and November 2021 with the MEMO 4D semirigid annuloplasty ring. RESULTS: In total, 53 patients were included in the study. Mean patient age was 63.6 ± 11.7 years. Most patients presented with degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (N = 44; 83%). The grade of mitral regurgitation was equal or more than 3 + in 98.1% of the patients (N = 52). The most used ring size was size 34 mm (N = 30, 56.6%). There was no intraoperative or hospital mortality. No cases of stroke, bleeding, endocarditis or other major complications occurred. At discharge, most patients were in NYHA class I. Postoperative echocardiographic results showed no (90.6%) or 1+ (5.7%) mitral valve regurgitation. Only 1 patient (1.9%) presented with mitral valve regurgitation grade 2+. Mean postoperative transvalvular gradient was low (mean = 3.3 ± 1.2 mmHg). No cases of LVOT obstruction or systolic anterior motion occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our series showed excellent mitral valve competency and very satisfactory early clinical outcomes. The transesophageal echocardiographic follow-up, despite obtained in a limited number of patients, further confirmed the effectiveness of findings of this preliminary experience.

Sutureless versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A multicenter analysis of "real-world" data.

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggested that transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may be indicated also for low-risk patients. However, robust evidence is still lacking, particularly regarding valve performance at follow-up that confers a limitation to its use in young patients. Moreover, a literature gap exists in terms of 'real-world' data analysis. The aim of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) versus transfemoral TAVR. METHODS: Prospectively collected data were retrieved from a centralized database of nine cardiac surgery centers between 2010 and 2018. Follow-up was completed in June 2019. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Patients in the TAVR group (n=1002) were older and with more comorbidities than SuAVR patients (n=443). The PSM analysis generated 172 pairs. No differences were recorded between groups in 30-day mortality [SuAVR vs TAVR: n=7 (4%) vs n=5 (2.9%); p=0.7] and need for pacemaker implant [n=10 (5.8%) vs n=20 (11.6%); p=0.1], but costs were lower in the SuAVR group (20486.6±4188€ vs 24181.5±3632€; p<0.01). Mean follow-up was 1304±660 days. SuAVR patients had a significantly higher probability of survival than TAVR patients (no. of fatal events: 22 vs 74; p<0.014). Median follow-up was 2231 days and 2394 days in the SuAVR and TAVR group, respectively. CONCLUSION: The treatment of aortic valve stenosis with surgical sutureless or transcatheter prostheses is safe and effective. By comparing the two approaches, patients who can undergo surgery after heart team evaluation show longer lasting results and a more favorable cost ratio.