Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Prog Urol ; 15(2): 226-30; discussion 230, 2005 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15999598

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and morbidity of laparoscopic surgery in the management of upper urinary tract stones. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between January 1998 and July 2004, 18 patients (14 males, 4 females) underwent laparoscopic extraction of an upper urinary tract stone. Stones were lumbar (n=13), ureteropelvic (n=2), iliac (n=1), inferior caliceal (n=1), and intradiverticular (n=1) with a mean diameter of 15 mm (range: 8-25 mm). Fifteen stones were obstructive. Laparoscopy was performed after failure of one or several previous treatments in 9 cases: ESWL (n=2), retrograde (n=1), anterograde ureteroscopy (n=6). A retroperitoneal approach (n=15) was used for caliceal and lumbar stones and a transperitoneal approach (n=3) was used for pyeloureteric and iliac stones. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 80 minutes (range: 40-150 min). The mean blood loss was 50 cc (range: 0-250 cc). The mean length of stay was 3.86 days (range: 2 to 7 days). Fifteen patients were drained by a double J stent for one month. The stone was removed by laparoscopy in every case. One patient developed a urinoma requiring surgical repair via a lumbar incision. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy currently constitutes an attractive alternative for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones and, in this study, was indicated for first-line treatment of obstructive stones larger than 12 mm impacted in the ureter or after failure of previous treatments.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi/surgery , Laparoscopy , Ureteral Calculi/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...