The hepatocyte growth factor mimetic, ANG-3777, in kidney transplant recipients with delayed graft function: Results from a randomized phase 3 trial.

In kidney transplant recipients, delayed graft function increases the risk of graft failure and mortality. In a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the hepatocyte growth factor mimetic, ANG-3777 (once daily for 3 consecutive days, starting ≤30 hours posttransplant), in 248 patients receiving a first kidney transplant from a deceased donor. At day 360, estimated glomerular filtration rate (primary endpoint) was not significantly different between the ANG-3777 and placebo groups. There were no significant between-group differences in the duration of dialysis through day 30 or in the percentage of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of >30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at day 360. The incidence of both delayed graft function and acute rejection was similar between ANG-3777 and placebo groups (68.5% vs 69.4% and 8.1% vs 6.5%, respectively). ANG-3777 was well tolerated, and there was a numerically lower incidence of graft failure versus placebo (3.2% vs 8.1%). Although there is insufficient evidence to support an indication of ANG-3777 for patients at risk of renal dysfunction after deceased-donor kidney transplantation, these findings indicate potential biological activity that may warrant further investigation.

Medical and Surgical Management of the Failed Pancreas Transplant.

Despite the continued improvements in pancreas transplant outcomes in recent decades, a subset of recipients experience graft failure and can experience substantial morbidity and mortality. Here, we summarize what is known about the failed pancreas allograft and what factors are important for consideration of retransplantation. The current definition of pancreas allograft failure and its challenges for the transplant community are explored. The impacts of a failed pancreas allograft are presented, including patient survival and resultant morbidities. The signs, symptoms, and medical and surgical management of a failed pancreas allograft are described, whereas the options and consequences of immunosuppression withdrawal are reviewed. Medical and surgical factors necessary for successful retransplant candidacy are detailed with emphasis on how well-selected patients may achieve excellent retransplant outcomes. To achieve substantial medical mitigation and even pancreas retransplantation, patients with a failed pancreas allograft warrant special attention to their residual renal, cardiovascular, and pulmonary function. Future studies of the failed pancreas allograft will require improved reporting of graft failure from transplant centers and continued investigation from experienced centers.

The Perspectives of General Nephrologists Toward Transitions of Care and Management of Failing Kidney Transplants.

The management of failing kidney allograft and transition of care to general nephrologists (GN) remain a complex process. The Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice (KPCOP) Failing Allograft Workgroup designed and distributed a survey to GN between May and September 2021. Participants were invited via mail and email invitations. There were 103 respondents with primarily adult nephrology practices, of whom 41% had an academic affiliation. More than 60% reported listing for a second kidney as the most important concern in caring for patients with a failing allograft, followed by immunosuppression management (46%) and risk of mortality (38%), while resistant anemia was considered less of a concern. For the initial approach to immunosuppression reduction, 60% stop antimetabolites first, and 26% defer to the transplant nephrologist. Communicating with transplant centers about immunosuppression cessation was reported to occur always by 60%, and sometimes by 29%, while 12% reported making the decision independently. Nephrologists with academic appointments communicate with transplant providers more than private nephrologists (74% vs. 49%, p = 0.015). There are heterogeneous approaches to the care of patients with a failing allograft. Efforts to strengthen transitions of care and to develop practical practice guidelines are needed to improve the outcomes of this vulnerable population.

The failing kidney allograft: A review and recommendations for the care and management of a complex group of patients.

The return to dialysis after allograft failure is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. This transition is made more complex by the rising numbers of patients who seek repeat transplantation and therefore may have indications for remaining on low levels of immunosuppression, despite the potential increased morbidity. Management strategies vary across providers, driven by limited data on how to transition off immunosuppression as the allograft fails and a paucity of randomized controlled trials to support one approach over another. In this review, we summarize the current data available for management and care of the failing allograft. Additionally, we discuss a suggested plan for immunosuppression weaning based upon the availability of re-transplantation and residual allograft function. We propose a shared-care model in which there is improved coordination between transplant providers and general nephrologists so that immunosuppression management and preparation for renal replacement therapy and/or repeat transplantation can be conducted with the goal of improved outcomes and decreased morbidity in this vulnerable patient group.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily LCP-Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Adult Hispanic Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: Sub-Group Analysis from a Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used to prevent transplant rejection, can differ in specific subpopulations. This analysis examined treatment outcomes and safety of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in stable Hispanic kidney transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data from Hispanic adult stable kidney transplant recipients randomized to remain on IR-Tac or convert from IR-Tac to a reduced dose of LCPT (NCT00817206). Composite treatment failure was evaluated at 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and tacrolimus trough concentrations were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS Fifty-five stable (LCPT n=26, IR-Tac n=29) kidney transplant recipients who self-identified as Hispanic or Latino were included in this analysis. Composite treatment failure occurred in 1 patient (4%) who converted to LCPT and 1 (3%) who remained on IR-Tac. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was stable over time and similar in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.08). Tacrolimus trough levels for both groups were similar over time in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.98). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in patients who converted to LCPT and in those who remained on IR-Tac. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy and safety were similar in Hispanic kidney transplant recipients who converted from IR-Tac to LCPT and in those remaining on IR-Tac.

Kidney recipients with allograft failure, transition of kidney care (KRAFT): A survey of contemporary practices of transplant providers.

Kidney allograft failure and return to dialysis carry a high risk of morbidity. A practice survey was developed by the AST Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice workgroup and distributed electronically to the AST members. There were 104 respondents who represented 92 kidney transplant centers. Most survey respondents were transplant nephrologists at academic centers. The most common approach to immunosuppression management was to withdraw the antimetabolite first (73%), while only 12% responded they would withdraw calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) first. More than 60% reported that the availability of a living donor is the most important factor in their decision to taper immunosuppression, followed by risk of infection, risk of sensitization, frailty, and side effects of medications. More than half of respondents reported that embolization was either not available or offered to less than 10% as an option for surgical intervention. Majority reported that ≤50% of failed allograft patients were re-listed before dialysis, and less than a quarter of transplant nephrologists performed frequent visits with their patients with failed kidney allograft after they return to dialysis. This survey demonstrates heterogeneity in the care of patients with a failing allograft and the need for more evidence to guide improvements in clinical practice related to transition of care.

Management of patients with a failed kidney transplant: Dialysis reinitiation, immunosuppression weaning, and transplantectomy.

The number of patients reinitiating dialysis after a failed transplant increases over time and has more than doubled between the year 1988 and 2010 (an increase from 2463 to 5588). More importantly, patients returning to dialysis have been shown to have a greater than three-fold increase in the annual adjusted mortality rates compared with those with a functioning graft. Continuation of immunosuppression to preserve residual graft function has been implicated to be a contributing factor, seemingly due to immunosuppression-associated cardiovascular and infectious complications and malignancy risk, among others. Nonetheless, maintenance low-dose immunosuppression has been suggested to confer survival benefit in patients returning to peritoneal dialysis. Whether early vs late reinitiation of dialysis or whether transplantectomy has an impact on patient survival remains poorly defined. Consensus guidelines for the management of a failed allograft are lacking. In this article, we present a literature overview on the ideal timing of dialysis reinitiation after graft loss, the management of immunosuppression after graft failure, and the risks and benefits of transplantectomy. The authors' perspectives on the management of this special patient population are also discussed.

Quality of life in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate quality of life (QOL) in kidney transplant recipients aged 65 and older, identify predictors of impaired physical and mental QOL cross-sectionally and compare QOL over time with that of younger transplant recipients and general population controls. DESIGN: Comparison of serial Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) QOL scores in transplant recipients aged 65 and older with those of transplant recipients younger than 65 and with those of general population controls from the National Health Measurement Study (NHMS). SETTING: University of Minnesota. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older (n = 150) and younger than 65 (n = 1,544) who received a primary kidney transplant between 1963 and 2009. MEASUREMENTS: Two-sample t-tests and logistic regression were used to assess the risk of significant impairment in physical and mental QOL, defined as 1 standard deviation below the general population norms (<40 points) for the SF-36 Physical (PCS) and Mental Component Subscale (MCS) scores. RESULTS: PCS scores were 39.3 for transplant recipients aged 65 and older, 43.5 for recipients younger than 65, and 49.2 for NHMS controls (P < .005 for each pairwise comparison). MCS scores were 54.6 for transplant recipients aged 65 and older, 51.0 for recipients younger than 65, and 53.8 for NHMS controls (P < .005 for ≥ 65 vs <65 and NHMS vs <65). These scores did not change significantly from the first (3.6 years after transplant) to the last (6.2 years after transplant) survey. Longer time since transplantation in elderly participants was associated with having significantly impaired physical QOL, but no predictors were associated with significantly impaired mental QOL. In younger recipients, rejection, diabetes mellitus, delayed graft function, coronary artery disease, and longer time on dialysis were associated with impaired physical QOL. Rejection, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and longer time on dialysis were predictors of impaired mental QOL. CONCLUSION: Physical QOL is lower in elderly recipients but mental QOL is maintained and is higher than in younger recipients.

Agreement of reported vascular access on the medical evidence report and on medicare claims at hemodialysis initiation.

BACKGROUND: The choice of vascular access type is an important aspect of care for incident hemodialysis patients. However, data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medical Evidence Report (form CMS-2728) identifying the first access for incident patients have not previously been validated. Medicare began requiring that vascular access type be reported on claims in July 2010. We aimed to determine the agreement between the reported vascular access at initiation from form CMS-2728 and from Medicare claims. METHODS: This retrospective study used a cohort of 9777 patients who initiated dialysis in the latter half of 2010 and were eligible for Medicare at the start of renal replacement therapy to compare the vascular access type reported on form CMS-2728 with the type reported on Medicare outpatient dialysis claims for the same patients. For each patient, the reported access from each data source was compiled; the percent agreement represented the percent of patients for whom the access was the same. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify characteristics associated with the agreement of reported access. RESULTS: The two data sources agreed for 94% of patients, with a Kappa statistic of 0.83, indicating an excellent level of agreement. Further, we found no evidence to suggest that agreement was associated with the patient characteristics of age, sex, race, or primary cause of renal failure. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that vascular access data as reported on form CMS-2728 are valid and reliable for use in research studies.

Predictors of graft failure and death in elderly kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: The upper age limit to receive a kidney transplant has progressively risen, but the outcomes of elderly (ages ≥65 years) transplant recipients remain understudied. We therefore evaluated mortality, graft failure, and predictors of these outcomes in this population. METHODS: Three cohorts of recipients transplanted between 1963 and 2012 (ages <50 years [n=2900], 50-64 years [n=1218], and ≥65 years [n=364] at transplantation) were compared for allograft and patient outcomes. Three similar age cohorts transplanted after 2000 (n=1410) were studied separately to address era effect. RESULTS: Death-censored graft survival was higher in recipients ages ≥65 years: 5, 10, and 15 years was 90.7%, 80.4%, and 73.7%; for ages 50-64 years, it was 87.2%, 77.6%, and 71.5%; and for ages <50 years was 79.8%, 70.3%, and 60.8%. Risk factors for graft failure in those ages ≥65 years included panel-reactive antibody >10%, congestive heart failure (CHF), delayed graft function, and cellular rejection. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year patient survival rate was 69.7%, 36.0%, and 14.0% for those ages ≥65 years; 76.4%, 54.8%, and 34.0% for those ages 50-64 years; and 81.7%, 66.7%, and 52.2% for those ages <50 years. For the entire cohort of elderly recipients, coronary artery disease and CHF were associated with mortality, and in those recipients transplanted after 2000, the risk factors for mortality were coronary artery disease, graft failure, peripheral vascular disease, and cause of end-stage renal disease listed as other. For graft failure, only CHF and cellular rejection were associated with this outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The overall outcomes of transplantation in elderly kidney transplant recipients ages ≥65 years are excellent, but the risk factors for mortality and graft failure are distinctly different than those observed in younger recipients.