Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(2): 227-232, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29063987

ABSTRACT

A chest infiltrate is needed to make a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, but chest X-rays might be time consuming, entail radiation exposure, and demand resources that are not always available. We sought to derive a model to predict whether a patient will have an infiltrate on chest X-ray (CXR). This prospective observational study included patients visiting the Emergency Department of Beilinson Hospital in the years 2003-2004 (derivation cohort) and 2010-2011 (validation cohort), who had undergone a CXR, and were suspected of having a respiratory infection. We excluded all patients with possible healthcare associated infections. A logistic regression model was derived and applied to the validation cohort. A total of 1,555 patients met inclusion criteria: 993 in the derivation cohort and 562 in the validation cohort with 287 (29%) and 226 (40%) having an infiltrate, respectively. The derivation model area-under-the curve (AUC) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82). We categorized the patients into three groups-presence or absence of infiltrate, or undetermined. In the validation cohort, 70 (12%) patients were classified as 'no infiltrate'; 3 (4%) of them had an infiltrate, 367 (65%) were classified as 'infiltrate'; 190 (52%) of them had an infiltrate on CXR, and 125 (46%) were classified as 'undetermined'; 33 (26%) of them with an infiltrate on CXR. Using this prediction model for the evaluation of patients with suspected respiratory infection in an ED setting may help avoid over 10% of CXRs.


Subject(s)
Community-Acquired Infections/diagnosis , Decision Support Techniques , Neutrophil Infiltration/immunology , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Aged , Community-Acquired Infections/diagnostic imaging , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Pneumonia/diagnostic imaging , Pneumonia/microbiology , Prospective Studies , Radiography, Thoracic
2.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 21(1): 54-8, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636928

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine whether ertapenem, being highly protein bound, is less effective than other carbapenems in the presence of hypoalbuminemia. In a prospective cohort study, we included adults with clinically and microbiologically documented infections caused by carbapenem-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae who were hospitalized in a tertiary medical center from March 2010 to September 2012. We tested whether hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin <2.5 g/dL) had a larger effect on 30-day mortality in subjects treated with ertapenem compared to those treated with meropenem or imipenem (I/M). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for death including the carbapenem drug and the interaction between albumin and the carbapenem. Of 279 individual subjects included, 173 were treated with ertapenem and 106 with I/M. The odds ratio (OR) for 30-day mortality with hypoalbuminemia was 4.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1-10.1) among subjects with ertapenem versus 1.2 (95% CI 0.5-2.70) with I/M (p = 0.02 for difference between groups). In the regression model, the interaction between carbapenem type and albumin levels was significant (p = 0.03); for ertapenem lower albumin levels were associated with increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.19-5.05), while for I/M the change was not significant (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.31-1.41). The model suggests that the risk of death for ertapenem-treated subjects quintupled when albumin was 2 g/dL compared to 4 g/dL. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with mortality significantly more among subjects treated with ertapenem compared to subjects treated with I/M. The effectiveness of current dosing schemes of ertapenem in subjects with significant hypoalbuminemia should be revisited.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Enterobacteriaceae Infections , Hypoalbuminemia/complications , Hypoalbuminemia/mortality , beta-Lactams/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Enterobacteriaceae/drug effects , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/complications , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/drug therapy , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/microbiology , Enterobacteriaceae Infections/mortality , Ertapenem , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
3.
QJM ; 108(3): 197-204, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25190265

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a feared complication during hospitalization. The practice of administering pharmacological prophylaxis is highly endorsed despite failure of studies to show reduction in mortality. AIM: : To determine the benefit of VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with sepsis. METHODS: A prospective cohort, with enrollment between January 2010 and April 2011. Patients were detected in four medicine departments at a university-affiliated hospital and followed for 90 days for pre-specified outcomes. We included all septic patients at high VTE risk defined by Padua score ≥ 4. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Incidence of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis or major bleeding episodes at 30 and 90 days, and 90-day mortality were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1540 patients were identified, of which 720 (55%) were at high risk for VTE and included. A total of 213 (29.6%) patients received prophylaxis. VTE occurred in 6 control patients and 2 treated (0.9 and 1.2%, respectively, RR 0.79, CI: 0.16-3.95). Major bleeding events occurred in 4 (0.8%) control and 7 (3.3%) treated patients (RR 4.1, CI: 1.24-14.08, P = 0.01). After adjusting for covariates, VTE prophylaxis conferred no 30- or 90-day mortality benefit (OR 1.24, CI: 0.79-1.93 and OR 1.47, CI: 0.99-2.17, respectively). Lack of significant benefit with prophylaxis persisted after propensity-score matching (OR for 30-day mortality 1.01, CI: 0.66-1.55). CONCLUSIONS: In acutely ill inpatients with sepsis, no significant benefit was demonstrated for VTE prophylaxis, with higher rates of bleeding. The risk-benefit ratio of this intervention should be carefully examined.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Sepsis/complications , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Acute Disease , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Venous Thromboembolism/mortality
4.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 34(4): 805-10, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25502509

ABSTRACT

Antibiotic escalations are frequently guided by fever persistence. Unnecessary antibiotic escalation is associated with resistance induction. We examined whether fever persistence is associated with adverse outcomes among medical inpatients with sepsis. In a single-center prospective cohort study, we included consecutive medical inpatients with suspected or documented bacterial infections. Data were collected on days 0, 2, 4, and 30 days from episode onset. We examined the association between fever persistence at 4 days and 30-day mortality on univariate and multivariate analysis. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IAET) was defined for patients with microbiologically documented infections (MDIs). Odds ratios (ORs) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 1,621 patients were included. Among patients with MDIs, 38/206 (18.4%) given appropriate empiric therapy had continued fever on day 4, compared to 64/231 (27.7%) of patients receiving IAET, OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93. Fever persistence was not associated with mortality after adjustment for other risk factors. Among patients with presumed sepsis who did not have MDIs, persistent fever was significantly associated with 30-day mortality on a multivariate analysis, adjusted OR 2.77 (95% CI 1.78-4.31). Other risk factors for mortality included older age, nosocomial infections, malignancy, dyspnea, shock, decreased albumin, and elevated creatinine. For patients with MDIs, fever persistence for up to 4 days is a marker of IAET, but is not associated with mortality, and should not, in itself, trigger antibiotic escalation. For patients without MDIs, fever persistence should trigger careful re-evaluation, as it is associated with mortality.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/pathology , Drug Monitoring/methods , Drug Therapy/methods , Fever/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacteremia/mortality , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 20(9): 899-905, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24655107

ABSTRACT

Influenza vaccination is recommended for cancer patients; however, adherence is low. We aimed to identify predictive factors for vaccination among cancer patients. We conducted a case-control analysis of a patient cohort in the 2010-2011 influenza season. We included adult cancer patients with solid malignancies undergoing chemotherapy, and haematological patients with active disease. Patients who died between October and November 2010 (N = 43) were excluded from analysis. Cases received the 2011 seasonal influenza vaccine, and controls did not. Data were obtained from patients' records, and validated through personal interviews. We collected socio-demographic information, and data on the malignancy and co-morbidities and triggers for vaccination and non-vaccination. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses, in which vaccination status was the dependent variable. Of 806 patients included in analysis, 387 (48%) were vaccinated. Variables associated with vaccination on bivariate analysis were older age, higher socio-economic status, lower crowding index, marital status (widowed > married > single), malignancy type (haematological > solid tumours) and time from diagnosis, low-risk malignancy, diabetes, past vaccination, country of birth (non-Russian origin), and physicians' recommendations. Predictive factors found to be independently associated with vaccination on multivariable analysis were past vaccinations, low-risk malignancy, and country of birth. In the analysis conducted among interviewees (N = 561), recommendations from the oncologist (OR 10.7, 95% CI 5.4-21.2) and from the primary-care physician (OR 3.35, 95% CI 2.05-5.49) were strong predictors for vaccination. We conclude that 'habitual vaccinees' continue influenza vaccinations when ill with cancer. Physicians' recommendations, especially the oncologist's, have a major influence on patients' compliance with influenza vaccination.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Neoplasms/complications , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
6.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 19(12): E582-93, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23991635

ABSTRACT

Infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incur significant costs. We aimed to examine the cost and cost-benefit of infection control interventions against MRSA and to examine factors affecting economic estimates. We performed a systematic review of studies assessing infection control interventions aimed at preventing spread of MRSA in hospitals and reporting intervention costs, savings, cost-benefit or cost-effectiveness. We searched PubMed and references of included studies with no language restrictions up to January 2012. We used the Quality of Health Economic Studies tool to assess study quality. We report cost and savings per month in 2011 US$. We calculated the median save/cost ratio and the save-cost difference with interquartile range (IQR) range. We examined the effects of MRSA endemicity, intervention duration and hospital size on results. Thirty-six studies published between 1987 and 2011 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Fifteen of the 18 studies reporting both costs and savings reported a save/cost ratio >1. The median save/cost ratio across all 18 studies was 7.16 (IQR 1.37-16). The median cost across all studies reporting intervention costs (n = 31) was 8648 (IQR 2025-19 170) US$ per month; median savings were 38 751 (IQR 14 206-75 842) US$ per month (23 studies). Higher save/cost ratios were observed in the intermediate to high endemicity setting compared with the low endemicity setting, in hospitals with <500-beds and with interventions of >6 months. Infection control intervention to reduce spread of MRSA in acute-care hospitals showed a favourable cost/benefit ratio. This was true also for high MRSA endemicity settings. Unresolved economic issues include rapid screening using molecular techniques and universal versus targeted screening.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/economics , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Cost Savings , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/transmission , Hospitals , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/transmission
7.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 18(1): 18-29, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22168320

ABSTRACT

Colistin has been re-introduced into clinical practice for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Studies in the last decade attempted to reconstruct the path that present-day medications undergo prior to clinical use. In this review, we summarize the results of recent clinical studies. Colistin was associated with lower mortality than no effective treatment and higher unadjusted mortality than ß-lactams in non-randomized clinical studies. However, it was administered to sicker patients with carabapenem-resistant bacteria. Overall, nephrotoxicity rates were not higher with colistin in these studies, and colistin-induced nephrotoxicity is reversible in most patients. The emergence of colistin resistance has been described in high-use settings. Synergy with carbapenem, rifampin and other antibiotics has been reported in vitro. Randomized controlled trials are ongoing or in planning to assess this and other aspects of colistin use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Colistin/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Colistin/administration & dosage , Colistin/adverse effects , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , beta-Lactams/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...