Regulation of mRNA translation by estrogen receptor in breast cancer.

Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related fatalities and the most often diagnosed malignancy in women globally. Dysregulation of sex hormone signaling pathways mediated by the estrogen receptor (ER) in breast cancer is well characterized. Although ER is known to promote cell growth and survival by altering gene transcription, recent research suggests that its effects in cancers are also mediated through dysregulation of protein synthesis. This implies that ER can coordinately affect gene expression through both translational and transcriptional pathways, leading to the development of malignancy. In this review, we will cover the current understanding of how the ER controls mRNA translation in breast cancer and discuss any potential clinical implications of this phenomenon.

Overexpression of Bromodomain and Extraterminal Domain is Associated with Progression, Metastasis and Unfavorable Outcomes: Highlighting Prognostic and Therapeutic Value of the BET Protein Family in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: As epigenetic readers, Bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins have attracted immense interest in developing novel therapies targeting this family to inhibit cancer progression. Although the impact of BRD4 in the carcinogenesis of various tumors has been widely investigated, little is known about the potential roles of the BET family in gastric cancer. METHODS: In this cohort study, we have screened the expression profile of the BET protein family, including three members, BRD2, BRD3 and BRD4, in fresh gastric cancer (GC), adjacent non-tumor and normal gastric tissues, as well as the anti-cancer effects and molecular mechanisms of BET inhibition in GC cell lines. RESULTS: Among GC patients, BRD2, BRD3 and BRD4 showed overexpression, 48.07% (25/52), 61.5% (32/52) and 63.46% (33/52), respectively. The overexpression of BRD3 and BRD4 were remarkably associated with unfavorable outcomes (HR = 2.023, P = 0.038; HR = 3.874, P = 0.001, respectively). However, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that BRDs mRNA expression could not be used as an independent prognostic factor for GC patients after adjustment with other variables. I-BET151, a potent pan-inhibitor, suppressing the BET family, decreased cell growth, migration and invasion of GC cells. Interestingly, I-BET151 induced G1 cell cycle arrest through down-regulation of c-Myc and its target, CDK2/Cyclin D1 complex. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide insights into the prognostic role of the BET family in GC and proposed BET inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for GC patients.

The Correlation between EGFR and Androgen Receptor Pathways: A Novel Potential Prognostic Marker in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Despite worthy biologic rationale and numerous studies introducing therapeutic strategies targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), phase III clinical trials have claimed that these current anti-EGFR agents did not significantly improve overall survival of Gastric Cancer (GC) patients. Therefore, to discover flawless candidates of anti-EGFR therapy and ideal prognostic markers, innovative studies are warranted. METHODS: The aim of this study was to assess the expression profile of EGFR in GC, adjacent non-tumor and normal gastric tissues by qRT-PCR, investigating the association of EGFR expression with clinicopathological features, evaluating possible molecular interaction between EGFR and Androgen Receptor (AR), and elucidating novel prognostic marker using Cox regression model. RESULTS: Among 60 GC patients, 70% (42/60) overexpressed EGFR relative to normal gastric tissues. EGFR overexpression was significantly correlated with the AR overexpression in GC patients. Although EGFR overexpression was remarkably associated with unfavorable outcomes (HR= 4.067, 95% CI= 1.228-13.467, p= 0.022), it was not an independent prognostic factor adjusted for other variables. However, we provided evidences that simultaneous evaluation of EGFR and AR expression, could independently predict the outcome of GC patients and could use as a precise prognostic marker. Moreover, it was revealed that induction or inhibition of AR signaling could alter the mRNA expression of EGFR in GC cell lines. CONCLUSION: By targeting AR and EGFR using a potent AR inhibitor such as Enzalutamide, we postulate the possible crosstalk between EGFR and AR pathways in GC. Moreover, our study provided evidences elucidating a novel promising marker, simultaneous evaluation of EGFR and AR expression, which could properly predict prognosis of gastric cancer patients.