Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 126: 105019, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34875501

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported anterior crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two implants with internal conical connections (4.0 × 10mm, Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils) were divided into four groups (n = 18 each): 1) Manufacturer's recommendations torque (25 N.cm for abutment's screw and 30 N.cm for crown's screw) (MaT); 2) Retightening after 10 min (ReT); 3) Torque 16% below recommended to simulate an uncalibrated wrench (AgT), and; 4) Temporary crown simulation (TeT), where crowns were torqued to 13 N.cm to simulate manual tightening, subjected to 11,200 cycles to simulate temporary crown treatment time (190 N), and then retightened to manufacturer torque (TeT). All specimens were subjected to cyclic fatigue in distilled water with a load of 190 N until 250,000 cycles or failure. The probability of survival (reliability) to complete a mission of 50,000 cycles was calculated and plotted using the Weibull 2-Parameter analysis. Weibull modulus and number of cycles at which 62.3% of the specimens would fail were also calculated and plotted. The failure mode was characterized in stereo and scanning electron microscopes (SEM). RESULTS: The probability of survival was 69.3% for MaT, 70% for ReT, 54.8% for AgT, and 40.3% for TeT, all with no statistically significant difference. Weibull modulus was approximately 1.0 for all groups. The characteristic number of cycles for failure was 105,000 cycles for MaT, 123,000 for ReT, 82,000 cycles for AgT, and 54,900 cycles for TeT, with no significant difference between groups. The chief failure mode for MaT, ReT, AgT groups was crown screw fracture, whereas abutment screw fracture was the chief failure mode for the TeT group. CONCLUSION: Tightening protocol did not influence the probability of survival of the screw-retained anterior crowns supported by internal conical implants (Ti-6Al-4V, Colosso, Emfils).


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Implants , Bone Screws , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Torque
2.
Dent Mater ; 36(6): 724-732, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359850

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the probability of survival and failure modes of lithium-disilicate, feldspathic-ceramic, and resin-nanoceramic anterior veneers cemented on dentin analog substrates after sliding-contact step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT). METHODS: A virtual incisor tooth preparation was produced with a reduction of 1.5mm at the incisal edge and of 0.7mm buccally. A .STL file of the preparation was generated and CAD/CAM based G10 dentin-analog material was used for testing. Laminate veneers were milled in three different materials: lithium-disilicate (LDS, E.max CAD), resin-nanoceramic (RN, Lava Ultimate), and feldspathic-ceramic (FELDS, Vita Blocks). SSALT was employed where a spherical indenter contacted the veneer, slided along its interface with G10 to lift off and start a new cycle at 2Hz in water. Qualitative fractography was performed. The probability of survival (90% confidence-bounds) was calculated for several load/cycle missions. RESULTS: The probability of survival for a mission of 50,000 cycles decreased from 50 up to 150N equally for all groups and were not different between them. At 200N, the probability of survival was significantly lower for FELDS (10%) compared to RN veneers (41%), whereas LDS presented intermediate values (22%). The characteristic strength of RN (247N) was significantly higher than LDS (149N), and FELDS (151N). In FELDS and LDS, hackles, wake hackles and twist hackles indicated the direction of crack propagation. In RN, hackles were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in probability of survival were observed only at 180 and 200N between groups. Failure modes were similar with veneer fracture down to the tooth-analog substrate.


Subject(s)
Computer-Aided Design , Dental Porcelain , Ceramics , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Dental Veneers , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Dent Mater ; 35(3): 511-522, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30686708

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the probability of survival of monolithic and porcelain veneered lithium disilicate crowns comprised by a conventional or modified core when loaded on marginal ridges. METHODS: Lithium disilicate molar crowns (n=30) were fabricated to be tested at mesial and distal marginal ridges and were divided as follows: (1) bilayered crowns with even-thickness 0.5mm framework (Bi-EV); (2) bilayered crowns with modified core design (Bi-M-lingual collar connected to proximal struts), and: (3) monolithic crowns (MON). After adhesively cemented onto composite-resin prepared replicas, mesial and distal marginal ridges of each crown (n=20) were individually cyclic loaded in water (30-300N) with a ceramic indenter at 2Hz until fracture. The 2-parameter Weibull was used to calculate the probability of survival (reliability) (90% 2-sided confidence bounds) at 1, 2, and 3 million cycles and mean life. RESULTS: The reliability at 1 and 2 million cycles was significantly higher for MON (47% and 19%) compared to Bi-EV (20% and 4%) and Bi-M (17% and 2%). No statistical difference was found between bilayered groups. Only the MON group presented crown survival (7%) at 3 million cycles. The mean life was highest for MON (1.73E+06), lowest for Bi-M (573,384) and intermediate for Bi-E (619,774). Fractographic analysis showed that the fracture originated at the occlusal surface. The highest reliability was found for MON crowns. The modified framework design did not improve the fatigue life of crowns. SIGNIFICANCE: Monolithic lithium disilicate crowns presented higher probability of survival and mean life than bilayered crowns with modified framework design when loaded at marginal ridges.


Subject(s)
Dental Porcelain , Zirconium , Crowns , Dental Prosthesis Design , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Prosthodont ; 27(7): 659-664, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27859976

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the reliability of narrow diameter dental implants (NDIs) with similar macrogeometry and 3 implant-abutment connection designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-four NDIs (3.5 × 10 mm) were selected and divided into 4 groups (n = 21/group) according to implant-abutment connection design, as follows: EH - external hexagon, IH - internal hexagon, IC - internal conical, and IC-M - internal conical connected to a monolithic titanium abutment. Identical abutments were torqued to the implants, and standardized maxillary incisor crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT) in water. Use of level probability Weibull curves, and reliability for a mission of 50,000 cycles at 75 N and 200 N were calculated. RESULTS: The beta (ß) values were: 1.48 for IC, 1.40 for IC-M, 8.54 for EH, and 1.98 for IH, indicating that damage accumulation was an acceleration factor for failure of all groups. At 75 N the probability of survival was not significantly different between groups. A decrease in reliability was observed for all groups at 200 N with no significant differences between IC (81.71%) and IC-M (94.28%), or between EH and IH (0%) which presented the lowest values. EH failures were primarily restricted to the screw, while IH involved screw and implant fracture. IC and IC-M were restricted to prosthetic failures (fracture and bending). CONCLUSIONS: Narrow implants with external or internal hexagon connections presented the lowest reliability at high loads compared to internal conical connections. Failure modes differed among connections.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Implant-Abutment Design , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Incisor , Materials Testing , Titanium , Torque
5.
Dent Mater ; 34(2): 260-271, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29258696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the residual stress (nanoindentation based on hardness) of fatigued porcelain-fused to zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with different framework designs. METHODS: Twenty maxillary 3-unit FDP replacing second-premolar (pontic) were fabricated with conventional framework-design (even-thickness of 0.5mm and 9mm2 connector area) and modified framework-design (thickness of 0.5mm presenting lingual collar connected to proximal struts and 12mm2 connector area). Connector marginal ridges were loaded and the fractured and suspended FDPs were divided (n=3/each) into: (1) Fractured zirconia even-thickness (ZrEvenF); (2) Suspended zirconia even-thickness (ZrEvenS); (3) Fractured zirconia with modified framework (ZrModF); (4) Suspended zirconia with modified framework (ZrModS); (5) Non-fatigued FDP with conventional framework design (Control). The FDPs were nanoindented at 0.03mm (Region of Interest (ROI) 1), 0.35mm (ROI 2) and 1.05mm (ROI 3) distances from porcelain veneer outer surface with peak load 4000µN. The Linear Mixed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Model on ranks and Least Significant Difference Test on ranks (95%) were used. RESULTS: Highest rank hardness values were found for Control group and ZrModS, whereas the lowest values were found in ZrModF. Statistical differences (p=0.000) were found among all groups except for comparison between ZrModS and Control group (p=0.371). Hardness between ROIs were statistically significant different (p<0.001) where ROI 1 presented the lowest values. SIGNIFICANCE: Framework-design modification did not influence the residual stress of porcelain-fused to zirconia fatigued 3-unit FDP. Whereas fractured FDPs showed the highest residual stress compared to suspended and control FDPs. Residual stress increased as nanoindented away from framework.


Subject(s)
Dental Porcelain/chemistry , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Stress Analysis/methods , Denture, Partial, Fixed , Zirconium/chemistry , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Veneers , Hardness Tests , Materials Testing
6.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 77: 470-474, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29032313

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of implant diameter in the reliability and failure mode of extra-short dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-three extra-short implants (5mm-length) were allocated into three groups according to platform diameter: Ø4.0-mm, Ø5.0-mm, and Ø6.0-mm (21 per group). Identical abutments were torqued to the implants and standardized crowns cemented. Three samples of each group were subjected to single-load to failure (SLF) to allow the design of the step-stress profiles, and the remaining 18 were subjected to step-stress accelerated life-testing (SSALT) in water. The use level probability Weibull curves, and the reliability (probability of survival) for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 100MPa, 200MPa, and 300MPa were calculated. Failed samples were characterized in scanning electron microscopy for fractographic inspection. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed for reliability regarding implant diameter for all loading missions. At 100MPa load, all groups showed reliability higher than 99%. A significant decreased reliability was observed for all groups when 200 and 300MPa missions were simulated, regardless of implant diameter. At 300MPa load, the reliability was 0%, 0%, and 5.24%, for Ø4.0mm, Ø5.0mm, and Ø6.0mm, respectively. The mean beta (ß) values were lower than 0.55 indicating that failures were most likely influenced by materials strength, rather than damage accumulation. The Ø6.0mm implant showed significantly higher characteristic stress (η = 1,100.91MPa) than Ø4.0mm (1,030.25MPa) and Ø5.0mm implant (η = 1,012.97MPa). Weibull modulus for Ø6.0-mm implant was m = 7.41, m = 14.65 for Ø4.0mm, and m = 11.64 for Ø5.0mm. The chief failure mode was abutment fracture in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: The implant diameter did not influence the reliability and failure mode of 5mm extra-short implants.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Implants , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Acrylic Resins , Humans , Incisor , Materials Testing , Pressure , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Mechanical , Tensile Strength , Torque
7.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ; 71: 244-249, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28365541

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the probability of survival (reliability) and failure modes of narrow implants with different diameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For fatigue testing, 42 implants with the same macrogeometry and internal conical connection were divided, according to diameter, as follows: narrow (Ø3.3×10mm) and extra-narrow (Ø2.9×10mm) (21 per group). Identical abutments were torqued to the implants and standardized maxillary incisor crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing (SSALT) in water. The use-level probability Weibull curves, and reliability for a mission of 50,000 and 100,000 cycles at 50N, 100, 150 and 180N were calculated. For the finite element analysis (FEA), two virtual models, simulating the samples tested in fatigue, were constructed. Loading at 50N and 100N were applied 30° off-axis at the crown. The von-Mises stress was calculated for implant and abutment. RESULTS: The beta (ß) values were: 0.67 for narrow and 1.32 for extra-narrow implants, indicating that failure rates did not increase with fatigue in the former, but more likely were associated with damage accumulation and wear-out failures in the latter. Both groups showed high reliability (up to 97.5%) at 50 and 100N. A decreased reliability was observed for both groups at 150 and 180N (ranging from 0 to 82.3%), but no significant difference was observed between groups. Failure predominantly involved abutment fracture for both groups. FEA at 50N-load, Ø3.3mm showed higher von-Mises stress for abutment (7.75%) and implant (2%) when compared to the Ø2.9mm. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between narrow and extra-narrow implants regarding probability of survival. The failure mode was similar for both groups, restricted to abutment fracture.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Stress Analysis , Crowns , Dental Prosthesis Design , Humans , Incisor , Materials Testing , Probability , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Mechanical
8.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater ; 105(6): 1481-1489, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27098440

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the reliability of implant-supported crowns repaired with resin composites. Fifty-four titanium abutments were divided in three groups (n = 18 each) to support resin nanoceramic molar crowns, as follows: (LU) (Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE); LU repaired with either a direct or an indirect resin composite. Samples were subjected to mouth-motion accelerated-life testing in water (n = 18). Cumulative damage with a use stress of 300 N was used to plot Weibull curves for group comparison. Reliability was calculated for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 400 N load. Beta values were 0.83 for LU, 0.31 and 0.27 for LU repaired with Filtek and Ceramage, respectively. Weibull modulus for LU was 9.5 and η = 1047 N, m = 6.85, and η = 1002 N for LU repaired with Ceramage, and m = 4.65 and η = 766 N for LU repaired with Filtek (p < 0.10 between LU and LU repaired with Filtek). Reliability at 400 N was 100% for both LU and LU repaired with Ceramage which were significantly higher than LU Filtek repair (32%). LU restored crowns failed cohesively. Fractures were confined within the restored material, and detailed fractography is presented. The performance of resin nanoceramic material repaired with an indirect composite was maintained after accelerated-life testing compared to unrepaired controls. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 105B: 1481-1489, 2017.


Subject(s)
Composite Resins/chemistry , Crowns , Dental Implants , Materials Testing , Stress, Mechanical , Humans
9.
Dent Mater ; 32(12): 1543-1554, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27697333

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the fatigue life of zirconia-veneered and metal-ceramic crowns comprised by an even thickness or a modified framework design when loaded on marginal ridges. METHODS: Eighty marginal ridges were present after fabrication of forty molar crowns cemented onto composite-resin replicas and divided (n=20/each), in the following groups: metal-ceramic with even thickness (MCev) or with a modified framework design (MCm, lingual collar with proximal struts); porcelain-fused to zirconia with even thickness (PFZev) or with the modified framework design (PFZm). Each marginal ridge (mesial and distal) was subjected to cyclic loading separately with a lithium disilicate indenter for 106 cycles or until fracture. Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon matched pair test (p<0.05) evaluated both marginal ridges. Every 125,000 cycles, the test was interrupted for damage inspection. Weibull distribution (90% confidence bounds) determined the probability of survival (reliability). RESULTS: Weibull 2-parameter contour-plot showed significantly higher fatigue life for PFZev compared to MC, and comparable with PFZm. A significant decrease in reliability was observed between groups from 625,000 until 106 cycles. Metal-ceramic groups presented significantly lower probability of survival at 106 cycles (MCev=0.66% and MCm=4.73%) compared to PFZm (23.41%) and PFZev (36.68%). Fractographic marks showed a consistent fracture origin and direction of crack propagation. Reliability was higher for porcelain-fused to zirconia than for metal ceramic crowns, regardless of framework design. SIGNIFICANCE: Zirconia-veneered crowns presented decreased fracture rates compared to metal ceramics, even when loaded at marginal ridges, regardless of framework design.


Subject(s)
Crowns , Dental Restoration Failure , Dental Veneers , Zirconium , Ceramics , Dental Porcelain , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Stress Analysis , Materials Testing , Reproducibility of Results
10.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(7): 1505-13, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26526325

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Narrow implants are indicated in areas of limited bone width or when grafting is nonviable. However, the reduction of implant diameter may compromise their performance. This study evaluated the reliability of several narrow implant systems under fatigue, after restored with single-unit crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Narrow implant systems were divided (n = 18 each), as follows: Astra (ASC); BioHorizons (BSC); Straumann Roxolid (SNC), Intra-Lock (IMC), and Intra-Lock one-piece abutment (ILO). Maxillary central incisor crowns were cemented and subjected to step-stress accelerated life testing in water. Use level probability Weibull curves and reliability for a mission of 100,000 cycles at 130- and 180-N loads (90 % two-sided confidence intervals) were calculated. Scanning electron microscopy was used for fractography. RESULTS: Reliability for 100,000 cycles at 130 N was ∼99 % in group ASC, ∼99 % in BSC, ∼96 % in SNC, ∼99 % in IMC, and ∼100 % in ILO. At 180 N, reliability of ∼34 % resulted for the ASC group, ∼91 % for BSC, ∼53 % for SNC, ∼70 % for IMC, and ∼99 % for ILO. Abutment screw fracture was the main failure mode for all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability was not different between systems for 100,000 cycles at the 130-N load. A significant decrease was observed at the 180-N load for ASC, SNC, and IMC, whereas it was maintained for BSC and ILO. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The investigated narrow implants presented mechanical performance under fatigue that suggests their safe use as single crowns in the anterior region.


Subject(s)
Dental Implants , Dental Stress Analysis/methods , Crowns , Dental Abutments , Dental Prosthesis Design , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Humans , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Reproducibility of Results , Surface Properties , Titanium
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...