Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
East Mediterr Health J ; 28(6): 397-406, 2022 Jun 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35815871

ABSTRACT

Background: High-normal blood pressure (HNBP) has become associated with a 2-3-fold increase in the risk of developing hypertension. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are independently linked to HNBP. Aims: To estimate the prevalence of HNBP, its predictors, and association with CVD risk among a country-representative sample of Egyptian adults. Methods: This study draws on data from the most recent Egyptian Health Issues Survey, and includes 13 983 adults aged 18-59 years. Sociodemographic data and anthropometric and blood pressure (BP) measurements were obtained, and the 10-year cardiovascular risk score was calculated using World Health Organization CVD risk charts for participants aged ≥ 40 years. Results: Overall, 15.31% and 21.0% of the study population had HNBP and hypertension, respectively. Compared to people aged 18-30 years, the odds of HNBP were 1.36, 1.67 and 2.39 among those aged 31-40, 41-50 and 51-59 years, respectively. The odds of HNBP were higher among male, overweight and obese adults, and patients with diabetes. The odds of HNBP and hypertension were higher among participants with high WHO CVD risk than those with low WHO CVD risk. Conclusion: HNBP is an alarming risk factor among Egyptian adults because it is strongly associated with CVD risk. Policy-makers should devise long-term, effective strategies for its prevention and control.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Hypertension , Adult , Blood Pressure , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Egypt/epidemiology , Heart Disease Risk Factors , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Prevalence , Risk Factors
2.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 13: 21501319221113544, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35869692

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a quick and reliable phone-triage system is critical for early care and efficient distribution of hospital resources. The study aimed to assess the accuracy of the traditional phone-triage system and phone triage-driven deep learning model in the prediction of positive COVID-19 patients. SETTING: This is a retrospective study conducted at the family medicine department, Cairo University. METHODS: The study included a dataset of 943 suspected COVID-19 patients from the phone triage during the first wave of the pandemic. The accuracy of the phone triaging system was assessed. PCR-dependent and phone triage-driven deep learning model for automated classifications of natural human responses was conducted. RESULTS: Based on the RT-PCR results, we found that myalgia, fever, and contact with a case with respiratory symptoms had the highest sensitivity among the symptoms/ risk factors that were asked during the phone calls (86.3%, 77.5%, and 75.1%, respectively). While immunodeficiency, smoking, and loss of smell or taste had the highest specificity (96.9%, 83.6%, and 74.0%, respectively). The positive predictive value (PPV) of phone triage was 48.4%. The classification accuracy achieved by the deep learning model was 66%, while the PPV was 70.5%. CONCLUSION: Phone triage and deep learning models are feasible and convenient tools for screening COVID-19 patients. Using the deep learning models for symptoms screening will help to provide the proper medical care as early as possible for those at a higher risk of developing severe illness paving the way for a more efficient allocation of the scanty health resources.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deep Learning , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage
3.
J Int Med Res ; 50(7): 3000605221109392, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35861236

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Early detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is crucial for patients and public health to ensure pandemic control. We aimed to correlate clinical and laboratory data of patients with COVID-19 and their polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results and to assess the accuracy of a deep learning model in diagnosing COVID-19. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using an anonymized dataset of patients with suspected COVID-19. Only patients with a complete dataset were included (n = 440). A deep analytics framework and dual-modal approach for PCR-based classification was used, integrating symptoms and laboratory-based modalities. RESULTS: Participants with loss of smell or taste were two times more likely to have positive PCR results (odds ratio [OR] 1.86). Participants with neutropenia, high serum ferritin, or monocytosis were three, four, and five times more likely to have positive PCR results (OR 2.69, 4.18, 5.42, respectively). The rate of accuracy achieved using the deep learning framework was 78%, with sensitivity of 83.9% and specificity of 71.4%. CONCLUSION: Loss of smell or taste, neutropenia, monocytosis, and high serum ferritin should be routinely assessed with suspected COVID-19 infection. The use of deep learning for diagnosis is a promising tool that can be implemented in the primary care setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Deep Learning , Neutropenia , Anosmia , COVID-19/diagnosis , Ferritins , Hospitals, University , Humans , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211039718, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34407661

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evaluating gender-specific effects of COVID-19 is important to develop effective therapeutic strategies. The aim of this study was to explore gender difference in perceived symptoms and laboratory investigations in suspected and confirmed cases. METHODS: This is a retrospective study that included data from suspected COVID-19 patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Participants using the phone triaging system at Kasralainy outpatient clinics were included. The analyzed data included patient history and results of nasopharyngeal swab and laboratory data. RESULTS: Out of 440 COVID-19 suspected cases, 56.36% were females. The perceived COVID-19 symptoms showed no significant gender difference in suspected cases while in confirmed cases females were 4 times more likely to complain of cough [OR (95% CI) 3.92 (1.316-11.68), P-value .014] and 5 times more likely to experience loss of smell or taste [OR (95% CI) 4.84 (1.62-14.43), P-value .005]. Laboratory markers revealed high levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, blood urea, serum creatinine, creatine kinase, and serum ferritin in males and this was statistically significant (P-value <.001) in suspected and confirmed cases. Females confirmed with COVID-19 were 80%, 97%, and 97% less likely to have high levels of ALT, creatin kinase, and serum ferritin [OR (95% CI) 0.20 (0.07-0.54), 0.07 (0.01-0.38), and 0.07 (0.01-0.90), P-value .002, .002, and .041, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Gender differences were found in laboratory markers in COVID-19 suspected and confirmed cases and in perceived symptoms in confirmed cases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Laboratories , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors
5.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211018940, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34032168

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The new Egyptian Universal Health Insurance Law is introduced through family-oriented primary health care. Increasing the number of recent graduates who specialized in family medicine is considered a national need to overcome family physicians' shortage. AIM: To explore the factors affecting the house officers' choice of Family Medicine as a future career amid the implementation of the new Universal Health Insurance Law in Egypt. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study conducted on house officers during their training in Cairo university hospitals from the first of March 2020 to February 2021. The researchers offered an anonymous self-administered questionnaire to all house officers at the beginning of their 2-week family medicine training (1170 house officers). RESULTS: A total of 1052 completed the questionnaire (response rate 90%). Family medicine as a specialty was considered by 53.6% (n = 564) of participants, while only 23.4% (n = 246) of participants had an obvious intention to choose family medicine. Multivariate (adjusted) logistic regression model revealed that factors significantly associated with intention to choose family medicine were marital status, knowledge about governmental advantages for family medicine offered to the specialized recent graduates, and previously encountered with family practice as customers. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of family medicine specialty is increasing among house officers. This could be attributed to the growing interest in family medicine in Egypt, especially after implementing the new insurance law's first phase in several Egyptian governorates.


Subject(s)
Family Practice , Universal Health Insurance , Career Choice , Cross-Sectional Studies , Egypt , Humans , Physicians, Family , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211017007, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33985376

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is an unprecedented challenge to house officers training programs because of the safety measures. OBJECTIVE: This current study aimed to introduce the adaptation of family medicine training for house officers during COVID-19 pandemic and gauge their level of satisfaction with the training. METHODS: Unfortunately, more than one-fourth of the house officers attending the family medicine training turned out to be hospital-admitted or in obligatory home isolation. A time-sensitive plan was proposed to maintain a competent training guaranteeing safety and support of house officers and fulfilling the training objectives in a virtual setting. Three mentors were assigned to each 10 house officers to provide continuous support and monitoring. Tutor and house officer interaction and reflection were maintained through a virtual clinical training session via Zoom application and a daily online discussion of a clinical scenario. Peer interaction was provided through post-webinar and small-group online discussion sessions. RESULTS: The adapted training was applied on thirteen cohorts of house officers. The response rate was 70% (666 out of 950). Most of them were satisfied with the training (84.6%). Their satisfaction with each modality of the training was encouraging. CONCLUSIONS: During COVID-19 pandemic, successful adaptation of family medicine training has succeeded in fulfilling the training objectives and providing psychological support and engagement for house officers without burdening the hospital-admitted and home-isolated house officers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Family Practice/education , Internship and Residency , Pandemics , Physicians, Family/education , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Egypt , Female , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Prim Care Community Health ; 12: 21501327211013303, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33913365

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic has affected the whole world, especially the frontline worriers. To get shielded through this war, the world is racing to reach and manufacture COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccination hesitancy is one of the significant obstacles to global health. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the perception and attitude of healthcare workers in Egypt toward COVID-19 vaccines, acknowledge the determinants of their attitude, and the factors that could increase the acceptance of the vaccine. METHODS: an observational web-based anonymous survey was conducted on 385 Egyptian healthcare workers in different governorates. The questionnaire-based on Vaccine Hesitancy Survey Questions of the World Health Organization was available in Arabic and English languages and was tested for reliability. RESULTS: Regarding vaccination decision, 51% of the participants were undecided, 28% refused, and 21% accepted vaccination. Reasons for vaccine acceptance mainly were risks of COVID-19 (93%), safety (57.5%), and effectiveness (56.25%) of the vaccine. Simultaneously, the reasons for vaccine hesitancy were the absence of enough clinical trials (92.4%) and fear of side effects of the vaccine (91.4%). The leading factor that could increase vaccination acceptance among the participants was to get sufficient and accurate information about the available vaccines. The participants revealed a high mean level of concern for COVID-19 vaccines' safety (3.8 of 5) that differs significantly among the different study groups (P-value .002). CONCLUSION: Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, only approximately 21% of Egyptian healthcare workers in our study accepted the COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine hesitancy represents a major barrier to implementing vaccination programs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Cross-Sectional Studies , Egypt , Health Personnel , Humans , Pandemics , Perception , Reproducibility of Results , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
8.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 13(2): 1543-1547, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336519

ABSTRACT

AIMS: to assess salivary glucose correlation with blood glucose and its accuracy in diagnosis of diabetes and prediabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comparative study including 204 adults in 3 groups (104 type 2 diabetics, 50 prediabetics, 50 non-diabetic controls) aging 18-65 years. The participants were interviewed about their socio-demographic, comorbidities, & drug treatment using a predesigned questionnaire. Salivary & blood samples were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Mean salivary glucose was observed to be 23.40 ±â€¯12.755 mg/dl in control group, 42.68 ±â€¯20.830 mg/dl in prediabetic group and 59.32 ±â€¯19.147 mg/dl in diabetic group with significant difference between the 3 groups (P value < 0.001). Salivary glucose was significantly correlated to FBS with strong positive association (r = 0.67, P value < 0.001 in control group, r = 0.56, P value < 0.001in diabetic group and r = 0.36, P value 0.01 in pre-diabetic group). Salivary glucose could differentiate non-diabetics from diabetics (AUC: 0.928, P value < 0.001) with sensitivity (94.2%) and specificity (62%) & differentiate non-diabetics from prediabetics (AUC: 0.928, P value < 0.001) with sensitivity (94.2%) and specificity (62%). CONCLUSIONS: Salivary glucose estimation can serve as valid and non-invasive test for screening and diagnosis of diabetes & prediabetes.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/metabolism , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Prediabetic State/diagnosis , Saliva/metabolism , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/metabolism , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prediabetic State/metabolism , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...