Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Pharmacother ; 54(8): 788-794, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32019318

ABSTRACT

Objective: The objective of this article is to review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, safety, dosage and administration, and formulary considerations of deflazacort. Data Sources: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (1946 to December 31, 2019) was conducted using the terms deflazacort and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Results were limited to clinical trials, humans, and English. Additional sources and data were obtained from the references of included articles and prescribing information. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All articles published after July 2014 related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, or safety of the therapy in human subjects were included. Data Synthesis: Deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/d is a once-daily oral corticosteroid and is the first drug of its class to be Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for DMD. Studies with deflazacort show improved functional outcomes, delayed onset of cardiomyopathy, reduction in scoliosis surgery, and improved survival, but these improvements are supported by relatively weak evidence. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This review presents data from studies published after the most recent DMD 2016 treatment guidelines and offers prescribing considerations, including pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, formulary considerations, and areas of uncertainty. Conclusions: Deflazacort presents an additional, FDA-approved corticosteroid option for patients that offers improved quality of life for DMD patients. However, there is weak evidence to support these benefits; a full risk-benefit analysis considering adverse events, efficacy, cost, and previous trials of steroid therapy is necessary when selecting therapy. Further research will help clarify deflazacort's optimal dose, duration of treatment, and impact on quality of life.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne/drug therapy , Pregnenediones/therapeutic use , Cardiomyopathies/prevention & control , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Pregnenediones/administration & dosage , Pregnenediones/adverse effects , Pregnenediones/pharmacokinetics , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(11): e011318, 2019 06 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31137991

ABSTRACT

Background Energy drinks have been linked to an increase in emergency room visits and deaths. We aim to determine the impact of energy drinks on electrocardiographic and hemodynamic parameters in young healthy volunteers. Methods and Results A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. Participants consumed 32 oz of either energy drink A, energy drink B, or placebo within 60 minutes on 3 study days with a 6-day washout period in between. The primary end point of QT c interval and secondary end points of QT interval, PR interval, QRS duration, heart rate, and brachial and central blood pressures were measured at baseline, and every 30 minutes for 240 minutes. A repeated-measures 2-way analysis of variance was performed with the main effects of intervention, time, and an interaction of intervention and time. Thirty-four participants were included (age 22.1±3.0 years). The interaction term of intervention and time was statistically significant for Bazett's corrected QT interval, Fridericia's corrected QT interval, QT , PR , QRS duration, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, central systolic blood pressure, and central diastolic blood pressure (all P<0.001). The maximum change from baseline in Bazett's corrected QT interval for drinks A, B, and placebo were +17.9±13.9, +19.6±15.8, and +11.9±11.1 ms, respectively ( P=0.005 for ANOVA ) ( P=0.04 and <0.01, respectively compared with placebo). Peripheral and central systolic and diastolic blood pressure were statistically significantly different compared with placebo (all P<0.001). Conclusion Energy drinks significantly prolong the QT c interval and raise blood pressure. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03196908.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/drug effects , Caffeine/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Electrocardiography , Energy Drinks/adverse effects , Heart Conduction System/drug effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Action Potentials/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Caffeine/administration & dosage , California , Central Nervous System Stimulants/administration & dosage , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Healthy Volunteers , Heart Conduction System/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...