Management of patients with high-risk and advanced prostate cancer in the Middle East: resource-stratified consensus recommendations.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer care in the Middle East is highly variable and access to specialist multidisciplinary management is limited. Academic tertiary referral centers offer cutting-edge diagnosis and treatment; however, in many parts of the region, patients are managed by non-specialists with limited resources. Due to many factors including lack of awareness and lack of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, a high percentage of men present with locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer at diagnosis. The aim of these recommendations is to assist clinicians in managing patients with different levels of access to diagnostic and treatment modalities. METHODS: The first Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) satellite meeting for the Middle East was held in Beirut, Lebanon, November 2017. During this meeting a consortium of urologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologist and imaging specialists practicing in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia voted on a selection of consensus questions. An additional workshop to formulate resource-stratified consensus recommendations was held in March 2019. RESULTS: Variations in practice based on available resources have been proposed to form resource-stratified recommendations for imaging at diagnosis, initial management of localized prostate cancer requiring therapy, treatment of castration-sensitive/naïve advanced prostate cancer and treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. CONCLUSION: This is the first regional consensus on prostate cancer management from the Middle East. The following recommendations will be useful to urologists and oncologists practicing in all areas with limited access to specialist multi-disciplinary teams, diagnostic modalities and treatment resources.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Stratified by Target Delineation for Patients Undergoing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Spinal Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment of spinal metastases in the vertebral body. However, variation has existed between practitioners regarding the appropriate target delineation. As such, we compared the tumor control, rates of compression fractures, and pain control for patients who had undergone SBRT for spinal metastases to either the lesion only (LO) or the full vertebral body (FVB). METHODS: A total of 126 spinal metastases in 84 patients had received single-fraction SBRT from January 2009 to February 2015. Of the 126 lesions, 36 (29%) were in the FVB group and 90 were in the LO group. The SBRT plans were reviewed to determine the treatment volume. Odds ratios were used to compare the rates of compression fracture and local failure. Regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of outcome. RESULTS: A total of 5 failures had occurred in the FVB group and 14 in the LO group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.5). No difference was found in pain reduction between the 2 groups (P = 0.9). Seven post-treatment compression fractures occurred in the LO group and four in the FVB group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.6). The minimum dose to the planning target volume, patient age, and planning target volume size were the only significant factors predicting for local failure, vertebral body fracture, and pain control, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Given that we found no difference in tumor control, pain reduction, or fracture rate between patients treated to the FVB versus the. LO, it might be reasonable to consider SBRT to the LO for select patients.

Incidence and predictors of Lhermitte's sign among patients receiving mediastinal radiation for lymphoma.

PURPOSE: To prospectively examine the risk of developing Lhermitte's sign (LS) in patients with lymphoma treated with modern-era chemotherapy followed by consolidation intensity-modulated radiation therapy. METHODS: We prospectively interviewed all patients with lymphoma who received irradiation to the mediastinum from July 2011 through April 2014. We extracted patient, disease, and treatment-related variables from the medical records of those patients and dosimetric variables from treatment-planning systems and analyzed these factors to identify potential predictors of LS with Pearson chi-square tests. RESULTS: During the study period 106 patients received mediastinal radiation for lymphoma, and 31 (29 %) developed LS. No correlations were found between LS and any of the variables examined, including total radiation dose, maximum point dose to the spinal cord, volume receiving 105 % of the dose, and volumes receiving 5 or 15 Gy. CONCLUSION: In this group of patients, treatment with chemotherapy followed by intensity-modulated radiation therapy led to 29 % developing LS; this symptom was independent of radiation dose and seemed to be an idiosyncratic reaction. This relatively high incidence could have resulted from prospective use of a structured interview.

Impact of treatment time and dose escalation on local control in locally advanced cervical cancer treated by chemoradiation and image-guided pulsed-dose rate adaptive brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: To report the prognostic factors for local control in patients treated for locally advanced cervical cancer with image guided pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS/METHODS: Patients treated with curative intent by a combination of external beam radiotherapy and pulsed-dose rate brachytherapy were selected. Local failure was defined as any relapse in the cervix, vagina, parametria, or uterus during follow-up. Prognostic factors were selected based on log rank tests and then analyzed with a Cox model. Dose/effect correlations were performed using the probit model. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients treated from 2006 to 2011 were included. According to the FIGO classification, 29% were stage IB, 58% stage II, 10% stage III, and 3% stage IVA; 95% received concomitant chemotherapy. Thirty patients were considered having incomplete response or local failure. Among the selected parameters, D90 for HR-CTV, D90 for IR-CTV, the overall treatment time, the TRAK, and the HR-CTV volume appeared significantly correlated with local control in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, overall treatment time >55days and HR-CTV volume >30cm(3) appeared as independent. The probit analysis showed significant correlations between the D90 for both CTVs, and the probability of achieving local control (p=0.008 and 0.024). The thresholds to reach to warrant a probability of 90% of local control were 85Gy to the D90 of the HR-CTV and 75Gy to 90% of the IR-CTV (in 2Gy equivalent, α/ß=10). To warrant the same local control rate, the D90 HR-CTV should be significantly increased in stage III-IV tumors, in case of HR-CTV >30cm(3), excessive treatment time, or tumor width at diagnosis >5cm (97, 92, 105, and 92Gy respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Overall treatment time and HR-CTV volume were independent prognostic factors for local control. The D90 for HR and IR CTV were significantly correlated with local control, and D90 HR-CTV should be adapted to clinical criteria.