Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in High School Football Players: Brain and Cervical Spine.

Football exposes its players to traumatic brain, neck, and spinal injury. It is unknown whether the adolescent football player develops imaging abnormalities of the brain and spine that are detectable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The objective of this observational study was to identify potential MRI signatures of early brain and cervical spine (c-spine) injury in high school football players. Eighteen football players (mean age, 17.0 ± 1.5 years; mean career length, 6.3 ± 4.0 years) had a baseline brain MRI, and 7 had a follow-up scan 9-42 months later. C-spine MRIs were performed on 11 of the 18 subjects, and 5 had a follow-up scan. C-spine MRIs from 12 age-matched hospital controls were also retrospectively retrieved. Brain MRIs were reviewed by a neuroradiologist, and no cerebral microbleeds were detected. Three readers (a neuroradiologist, a neurosurgeon, and an orthopedic spine surgeon) studied the cervical intervertebral discs at six different cervical levels and graded degeneration using an established five-grade scoring system. We observed no statistically significant difference in disc degeneration or any trend toward increased disc degeneration in the c-spine of football players as compared with age-matched controls. Further research is needed to validate our findings and better understand the true impact of contact sports on young athletes.

The Utility of Flexion-Extension Radiographs in Degenerative Cervical Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective radiologic analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to investigate if lateral flexion-extension radiographs identify additional cases of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) that would be missed by obtaining solely neutral upright radiographs, and determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCS and instability can be a cause of neck pain, radiculopathy, and even myelopathy. Standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and MRI of the cervical spine will identify most cervical spine pathology, but spondylolisthesis and instability are dynamic issues. Standard imaging may also miss DCS in some cases. METHODS: We compared the number of patients who demonstrated cervical spondylolisthesis on lateral neutral and flexion-extension radiographs in addition to MRI. We used established criteria to define instability as ≥2 mm of listhesis on neutral imaging, and ≥1 mm of motion between flexion-extension radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (555 cervical levels) were analyzed. In all, 41 patients (36.9%) demonstrated cervical spondylolisthesis on neutral and/or flexion-extension radiographs. Of the 77 levels of spondylolisthesis, 17 (22.1%) were missed on neutral radiographs ( P ,0.05). Twenty levels (26.0%) were missed when flexion-extension radiographs were used alone ( P =0.02). Twenty-nine levels (37.7%) of DCS identified on radiograph were missed by MRI ( P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral flexion-extension views can be useful in the diagnosis of DCS. These views provide value by identifying a significant cohort of patients that would be undiagnosed based on neutral radiographs alone. Moreover, MRI missed 38% of DCS cases identified by radiographs. Therefore, lateral radiographs can be a useful adjunct to neutral radiographs and MRI when instability is suspected or if these imaging modalities are unable to identify the source of a patient's neck or arm pain.

Does Addition of Tobramycin Powder Reduce Infection Rates After Spine Surgery?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of tobramycin and vancomycin powder in reducing surgical site infections in posterior lumbar instrumented fusion. METHODS: A multicenter, electronic database search was conducted for all patients who underwent posterior instrumented lumbar fusions. RESULTS: The addition of vancomycin powder decreased postoperative infections from an incidence of 5.7% down to a rate of 2.0%. This difference was statistically significant (P = .018). The addition of tobramycin powder to the wound in addition to vancomycin further decreased the infection rate down to 1.8%. The postoperative infection rate was statistically significant (P = .041) when compared with the no-powder group. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 1.00) when compared with vancomycin alone. There was also a trend toward gram-negative organisms with the addition of more antibiotic powder. In the control group, for example, the organisms cultured were 66% methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and 33% gram-negative organisms. In the vancomycin group, 30% of the organisms cultured were Staphylococcus aureus and 60% gram-negative organisms. In the vancomycin and tobramycin powder group, 100% of the organisms cultured were gram-negative. CONCLUSIONS: There is a reduction in surgical site infections with addition of antibiotic powder to the wound prior to closure. However, the reduction in the infection rate was not as great with the addition of tobramycin powder to vancomycin alone and there was a noticeable change in the spectrum of organism cultured with this addition. Clinicians should consider the risk-to-benefit ratio in each case when deciding to use antibiotic powder.

Preferences of Spine Surgeons With Regard to Management of Intraoperative Durotomy: A Survey of Current Management.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine spine surgeons' preferences for the intraoperative and postoperative management of intraoperative durotomy (IDT) in decompression and spinal fusion surgeries. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Management guidelines for IDT remain elusive. Traditionally, management consists of intraoperative suturing and postoperative bed rest. However, preferences of North American spine surgeons may vary, particularly according to type of surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Spine surgeons of AO Spine North America (AOSNA) were surveyed online anonymously to determine which techniques they preferred to manage IDT in decompression and fusion. Differences in preferences according to surgery type were compared using the Fisher exact test. A series of linear regressions were conducted to identify demographic predictors of spine surgeons' preferences. RESULTS: Of 217 respondents, most were male (95%), orthopedic surgeons (70%), practiced at an academic center (50%), were in practice 0-19 years (71%) and operated on 100-300 patients per year (70%). The majority of surgeons applied sutures (93%-96%) and sealant (82%-84%). Surgeons also used grafts (26%-27%), drains (18%), other techniques (4%-5%), blood patch (2%-3%), or no intraoperative management (1%-2%). Postoperatively, most surgeons recommended bed rest (74%-75%). Antibiotics (22%), immediate mobilization (18%-20%), reoperation (14%-16%), other techniques (6%), or no postoperative management (5%) were also preferred. Management preferences did not vary significantly between decompression and fusion surgeries (all P-values>0.05). Specialty, practice facility, years in practice, and patients per year were identified as independent predictors of IDT management preferences (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although North American spine surgeons preferred to manage IDT with sutures augmented by sealant followed by bed rest after surgery, less common techniques were also preferred during the intraoperative and postoperative periods. Notably, intraoperative and postoperative IDT management preferences did not change in accordance to the type of surgery being conducted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

Perioperative Ketamine for Analgesia in Spine Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative supplemental ketamine to reduce postoperative opioid analgesic consumption following spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although low-dose supplemental ketamine has been known to reduce pain after surgery, there is conflicting evidence regarding whether ketamine can be effective to reduce opioid consumption following spine surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for prospective RCTs, Web of Science, and Scopus. Patients who received supplemental ketamine were compared with the control group in terms of postoperative morphine equivalent consumption, pain scores, and adverse events. Mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to describe continuous outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were applied to dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 14 RCTs comprising 649 patients were selected for inclusion into the meta-analysis. Patients who were administered adjunctive ketamine exhibited less cumulative morphine equivalent consumption at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours following spine surgery (all Ps < 0.05). The ketamine group also reported lower postoperative pain scores at 6, 12, and 24 hours (all Ps < 0.05). None of the adverse events studied attained statistical significance (all Ps > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Supplemental perioperative ketamine reduces postoperative opioid consumption up to 24 hours following spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Variables Affecting Return to Work After Spinal Surgery in a Non-workers' Compensation Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Return-to-work (RTW) outcomes following spine surgery are critical information for patients aspiring to return to employment following surgical correction. Among patients receiving workers' compensation (WC), spinal surgery has been repeatedly linked to poor RTW rates. However, among patients not receiving WC, the percentage of patients who return to employment is unclear. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 326 non-WC patients who underwent spinal surgery at two institutions. We determined RTW status and analyzed potential predictors of RTW status. RESULTS: Preoperative work status was the only markedly positive predictor of RTW status; patients who were working prior to their surgery were more likely to return to work after surgery. Patients with at least one comorbidity were less likely to return to employment. All other sociodemographic, surgery-related, and complication variables did not reach statistical significance. However, smoking status, short fusion, and cervical fusion were clinically relevant predictors of a negative RTW status. DISCUSSION: Among non-WC patients, employment before surgery was a positive predictor for RTW status. For patients with a positive comorbidity status, a lower likelihood of returning to employment is predicted. Randomized trials are needed to fully explore the effect of predictor variables on RTW status among non-WC patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients not receiving WC who underwent spinal surgery had a high chance of returning to employment within 1 year if they had been working at least 3 months before the date of surgery.

Biomechanical Analysis of an S1 Pedicle Screw Salvage Technique via a Superior Articulating Process Entry Point.

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical, cadaveric study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the fixation strength of a novel S1 pedicle screw insertion technique in a revision setting to a standard S1 pedicle screw and an L5 pedicle screw. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Fusions to the sacrum remain a difficult clinical challenge. Very few salvage techniques exist when a nonunion occurs. METHODS: The biomechanical integrity of three screw fixations, L5 pedicle screws, a standard S1 pedicle screw, and an S1 pedicle screw placed via a superior articulating process entry point (SAP S1), was characterized by performing pullout tests using cadaveric specimens including L5 and sacrum. RESULTS: SAP S1 constructs (735.5 ±â€Š110.1 N/mm) were significantly stiffer than standard S1 (P = 0.005) and L5 (P = 0.02) constructs. There was no statistically significant difference between the L5 constructs and the standard S1 constructs for linear stiffness. There was no statistical difference between the three fixations for yield load, displacement at yield load, and energy absorbed to yield load.The ultimate pullout force for the SAP S1 was statistically higher than the standard S1 (1213.7 ±â€Š579.6 vs. 478.6 ±â€Š452.9 N; P = 0.004). Displacement at ultimate load was significantly greater for L5 screw fixation (3.3 ±â€Š1.1 mm) compared to the other two constructs. Both the L5 (2277.4 ±â€Š1873.3 N-mm) and SAP S1 (2628.2 ±â€Š2054.4 N-mm) constructs had significantly greater energy absorbed to ultimate load than the standard S1 construct (811.7 ±â€Š937.6 N-mm), but there was no statistical difference between the L5 and SAP S1 constructs. CONCLUSION: S1 pedicle screw fixation via an SAP entry point provides biomechanical advantages compared to screws placed via the standard S1 or L5 entry point and may be a viable option for revision of a failed L5-S1 fusion with a compromised standard S1 entry point. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.