Adverse side-effects of dexamethasone in surgical patients - an abridged Cochrane systematic review.

In the peri-operative period, dexamethasone is widely and effectively used for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the adverse effects of an incidental steroid load of dexamethasone in adult surgical patients. We searched in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Web of Science for randomised controlled trials comparing an incidental steroid load of dexamethasone with a control intervention in adult patients undergoing surgery. Two review authors independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed all included studies for bias. Our primary outcomes were postoperative systemic or wound infection, delayed wound healing and glycaemic response within 24 h. We included 37 studies in this meta-analysis. The pooled results found no evidence that dexamethasone increased the risk of a postoperative wound infection, Peto OR (95%CI) 1.01 (0.80-1.27); 4603 participants, 26 studies; I² = 32%; moderate-quality evidence. Whether dexamethasone influenced wound healing was unclear due to the large confidence intervals, Peto OR (95%CI) 0.99 (0.28-3.43); 1072 participants, 8 studies; I² = 0%; low-quality evidence. Dexamethasone produced a mild increase in glucose levels among participants without diabetes during the first 12 h after surgery, mean difference (95%CI) 0.7 mmol.l-1 (0.3-1.2) 10 studies; 595 participants; I² = 50%; low-quality evidence. This article is an abridged version of a Cochrane Review.

Radiographic signs associated with femoroacetabular impingement occur with high prevalence at all ages in a hospital population.

OBJECTIVES: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is increasingly diagnosed clinically. Controversy exists about the significance of radiographic findings. Our goal is to determine the prevalence of radiographic FAI types and parameters in a hospital population clinically not suspected of having FAI. In addition we assessed whether pain, age and gender are associated with higher prevalences. METHODS: Three hundred ten patients were included in this retrospective study. After applying the exclusion criteria, 262 patients (522 hips) remained. Two observers scored for radiographic parameters. A generalised estimation equation, Pearson's χ(2) test and logistic regression model were used. RESULTS: Radiographic signs of FAI were absent in only 58 hips (11.1 %). In the 40 hips (7.7 %) with cam impingement, males were more affected (P < 0.001). In the 330 hips (63.2 %) with pincer impingement, females were more often affected (P < 0.001). In the 82 hips (15.7 %) with signs of mixed type impingement, male hips were significantly (P < 0.001) more often affected. Age had some effect on the prevalence of coxa vara, acetabular index and acetabular retroversion. No correlation with pain was found. CONCLUSIONS: In this hospital population, signs occurred at a high rate. Radiographic parameters attributed to FAI are non-specific. Especially radiographic signs attributed to pincer type impingement have a high prevalence. KEY POINTS: • Femoroacetabular impingement is associated with an abnormal configuration of the hip joint. • The prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement parameters was high in our study population. • The diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement should be made clinically.