ABSTRACT
The correlation between fetal and extra-fetal structures with the prediction of the day before delivery (PAD) in miniature dog breeds was evaluated. In the experiment, he used 12 female dogs, with body weight between 3kg to 5kg. Biparietal diameter (DBP), thoracic diameter (DTX), abdominal diameter (DAB), cranial caudal length (CCC), diameter of the internal chorionic cavity (DCI) and thickness of the placenta (EP) were measured using ultrasonography, from the 15th day after the last ride. Evaluated the simple correlations and the significance of the simple linear regression coefficients and the determination coefficient (R), with a significance level set at p<0.05. Among the parameters evaluated, DBP, DTX, DAB and CCC were those that showed the highest correlation with gestational time, and can be used to predict the day before delivery in miniature female dogs.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Pregnancy , Dogs , Pregnancy, Animal/physiology , Ultrasonography/veterinary , Anatomy, Cross-SectionalABSTRACT
The correlation between fetal and extra-fetal structures with the prediction of the day before delivery (PAD) in miniature dog breeds was evaluated. In the experiment, he used 12 female dogs, with body weight between 3kg to 5kg. Biparietal diameter (DBP), thoracic diameter (DTX), abdominal diameter (DAB), cranial caudal length (CCC), diameter of the internal chorionic cavity (DCI) and thickness of the placenta (EP) were measured using ultrasonography, from the 15th day after the last ride. Evaluated the simple correlations and the significance of the simple linear regression coefficients and the determination coefficient (R), with a significance level set at p<0.05. Among the parameters evaluated, DBP, DTX, DAB and CCC were those that showed the highest correlation with gestational time, and can be used to predict the day before delivery in miniature female dogs.
Subject(s)
Female , Animals , Pregnancy , Dogs , Anatomy, Cross-Sectional , Pregnancy, Animal/physiology , Ultrasonography/veterinaryABSTRACT
Existem poucos estudos para padronizar farmacologicamente o uso de drogas anestésica em aves, sendo comum serem encontradas diferentes condutas profissionais. O presente estudo relata um procedimento anestésico de um psitacídeo de 9 meses atendido no setor de Animais Silvestres e Exóticos do Hospital Veterinário da UFBA. A ave foi submetida a anestesia geral para amputação da asa esquerda, mantida sob anestesia inalatória com isufluorano via máscara orofacial, além de um protocolo pré-anestésico composto pelo butorfanol (1 mg/kg) e midazolam (0,4 mg/kg). A lidocaína sem vasoconstritor (2 mg/kg)foi utilizada na anestesia local para otimizar o procedimento. O animal foi monitorado durante todo o trans e pós-operatório, mantendo um plano anestésico adequado. A recuperação foi segura e relativamente rápida. O animal teve alta no mesmo dia, estando estável e alerta. O proprietário relatou que a ave não demonstrou sinais de dor, mantendo normal a ingestão de água e alimento menos de 24h após a alta. A partir do exposto, o processo anestésico foi bem-sucedido e o prognóstico é bom. Dessa maneira, o presente trabalho contribui com dados importantes para a comunidade científica da área, visto que o protocolo anestésico em aves ainda é pouco relatado.(AU)
There are few studies to pharmacologically standardize the use of anesthetic drugs in birds, and it is common to find different professional behaviors. The present study reports ananesthetic procedure of a 9-month parrot attended at the Wild and Exotic Animals sector of the UFBA Veterinary Hospital. The bird underwent general anesthesia for left wing amputation, maintained under inhalation anesthesia with isufluorane via orofacial mask, inaddition to a pre-anesthetic protocol consisting of butorphanol (1 mg / kg) and midazolam(0.4 mg / kg). Lidocaine without vasoconstrictor (2 mg / kg) was used in local anesthesia to optimize the procedure. The animal was monitored throughout the trans and postoperative periods, maintaining an adequate anesthetic plan. Recovery was safe and relatively fast. The animal was discharged on the same day, being stable and alert. The owner reported that the bird showed no signs of pain, maintaining normal food and water intake less than 24 hours after discharge. From the above, the anesthetic process was successful and the prognosis is good. Thus, the present study contributes important data to the scientific community in the area, since the anesthetic protocol in birds is still poorly reported.(AU)
Subject(s)
Animals , Anesthesia/veterinary , Agapornis/surgery , Amputation, Surgical/veterinary , Wings, Animal/surgery , Parrots/surgeryABSTRACT
Existem poucos estudos para padronizar farmacologicamente o uso de drogas anestésica em aves, sendo comum serem encontradas diferentes condutas profissionais. O presente estudo relata um procedimento anestésico de um psitacídeo de 9 meses atendido no setor de Animais Silvestres e Exóticos do Hospital Veterinário da UFBA. A ave foi submetida a anestesia geral para amputação da asa esquerda, mantida sob anestesia inalatória com isufluorano via máscara orofacial, além de um protocolo pré-anestésico composto pelo butorfanol (1 mg/kg) e midazolam (0,4 mg/kg). A lidocaína sem vasoconstritor (2 mg/kg) foi utilizada na anestesia local para otimizar o procedimento. O animal foi monitorado durante todo o trans e pós-operatório, mantendo um plano anestésico adequado. A recuperação foi segura e relativamente rápida. O animal teve alta no mesmo dia, estando estável e alerta. O proprietário relatou que a ave não demonstrou sinais de dor, mantendo normal a ingestão de água e alimento menos de 24h após a alta. A partir do exposto, o processo anestésico foi bem-sucedido e o prognóstico é bom. Dessa maneira, o presente trabalho contribui com dados importantes para a comunidade científica da área, visto que o protocolo anestésico em aves ainda é pouco relatado.
There are few studies to pharmacologically standardize the use of anesthetic drugs in birds, and it is common to find different professional behaviors. The present study reports an anesthetic procedure of a 9-month parrot attended at the Wild and Exotic Animals sector of the UFBA Veterinary Hospital. The bird underwent general anesthesia for left wing amputation, maintained under inhalation anesthesia with isufluorane via orofacial mask, in addition to a pre-anesthetic protocol consisting of butorphanol (1 mg / kg) and midazolam (0.4 mg / kg). Lidocaine without vasoconstrictor (2 mg / kg) was used in local anesthesia to optimize the procedure. The animal was monitored throughout the trans and postoperative periods, maintaining an adequate anesthetic plan. Recovery was safe and relatively fast. The animal was discharged on the same day, being stable and alert. The owner reported that the bird showed no signs of pain, maintaining normal food and water intake less than 24 hours after discharge. From the above, the anesthetic process was successful and the prognosis is good. Thus, the present study contributes important data to the scientific community in the area, since the anesthetic protocol in birds is still poorly reported.