Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Open Heart ; 9(2)2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35926961

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of long-term inflammatory response and function in postoperative patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR) deserves special analysis because it is important to try to prevent reoperation and improve durability and functionality of the prostheses. It is our objective METHODS: In this study, we included a cohort of patients with aortic valve damage treated by AVR with mechanical prosthesis, bio prosthesis and we included a control group. RESULTS: We found that IL-4 and osteopontin levels were higher in patients with mechanical vs biological prostheses (p=0.01 and p=0.04, respectively), osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels were decreased (p=0.01), women had lower levels of ET-1 and IL-6, (p=0.02) (p=0.04), respectively. Patients older than 60 years had decreased levels of IL-1ß p<0.001) and a higher concentration of IL-4 p<0.05). IL-1ß, OPG and TNFα were higher in patients with less than 5 years of evolution vs more than 10 years (p=0.004, p=0.02 and p=0.03, respectively). Factors such as age, gender, prosthetic and elevated IL-1B and ET-1 levels are associated with valve dysfunction prosthetic. These results indicate that the inflammatory involvement present prior to valve replacement may be perpetuated by various factors in the long term. CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide us with the opportunity to effectively treat patients with AVR in the postoperative period, which could prolong the functionality of the bio prostheses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04557345.


Subject(s)
Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Diseases , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Bioprosthesis/adverse effects , Female , Heart Valve Diseases/diagnosis , Heart Valve Diseases/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Interleukin-4 , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(5): E686-E691, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478472

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 was first described in late 2019 that quickly became a pandemic affecting every health system as we know it. The high transmissibility among humans represents a well-known high burden of morbidity and mortality not only for cardiovascular patients but also for a higher risk between health care professionals that must deliver high-quality care to them in any scenario, and cardiac catheterization rooms are no exception. This creates a new dilemma, minimize exposure to patients and health care professionals to COVID-19 while maintaining high quality in cardiovascular therapeutics. In order to achieve this, several international recommendations on treatment algorithms modifications and in safety measures in the catheterization room have been published, always aiming to solve this dilemma in the best possible way. Hereby, we present a summary of the most recent treatment algorithms in the most important cardiovascular interventions (acute coronary syndromes, structural and congenital heart diseases) as well as specific safety measures with a step-by-step preparedness before and after any interventional procedure during COVID-19 outbreak. The objective of this document is to inform and to train health care professionals that works in cardiac catheterization rooms on the risks as well on the plan for containment, mitigation, and response to the global situation of COVID-19 infection in order to apply this in their own local work environments.


Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiology , Health Personnel/standards , Pandemics , Patient Care/methods , Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Comorbidity , Humans , Mexico/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
4.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(15): 2414-2418, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34317184

ABSTRACT

Treatment of ascending aorta disease is surgical; however, some series have evaluated the effectiveness of endovascular treatment. We report the case of a patient with a ruptured pseudoaneurysm who underwent endovascular repair via the left common carotid artery. The clinical and neurological evolution was satisfactory during the in-hospital follow-up. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...