Early experience with focused telemedicine implementation in an academic colorectal surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: The need to continue providing care to patients during the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic facilitated telemedicine's rapid adoption, including in surgical clinic settings. Our purpose was to evaluate integration of telemedicine into an academic colorectal surgery practice and assess physician experiences providing telemedicine care. METHODS: Patients seen in colorectal surgery clinic by telemedicine and in person from March 31, 2020 to August 31, 2020 were evaluated. Demographic and clinical outcomes were assessed for patients. Physician responses to a survey were collected. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-one telemedicine visits were performed by 4 physicians, comprising 20% of visits during the study period. Patients were 47.6% male and 90.9% Caucasian. In addition, 85.7% were established patients and 21.2% were postoperative visits. Diagnoses evaluated by telemedicine included benign and malignant anorectal and colorectal disease as well as inflammatory bowel disease. All providers reported being able to provide adequate care via telemedicine and were planning to continue providing telemedicine. Patients seen via telemedicine were more likely to be Caucasian and less likely to be African American (P < .001) and more likely to be established patients than those seen in person (P < .001). CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was most successfully used to facilitate care for established patients, particularly the long-term care of colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease. We identified significant differences in ethnicity between patients seen via telemedicine and those seen in person. Telemedicine represents an exciting advancement in patient care, although ongoing study is required regarding providing access to this technology to all colorectal surgery patients, particularly minority populations.

Questioning Aid for Rich, Real-Time Discussion (QARRD): A Tool to Improve Critical Thinking in Clinical Settings.

Introduction: Critical thinking skills are crucial for health professionals, especially in clinical settings. However, most health professions educators engage learners with only lower-level concepts such as definitions, fact recall, or basic explanations. Employing strategic questioning methods that require learners to use higher-order thinking can help develop clinical reasoning skills. Methods: The Questioning Aid for Rich, Real-time Discussion (QARRD) was created for health professions educators to purposefully implement concepts from Bloom's taxonomy and hierarchical questioning in clinical settings. The tool was introduced to faculty in a 1-hour, interprofessional workshop that described learning science and evidence-based questioning methods. Participants practiced QARRD questioning strategies and completed a pre/post case-based evaluation in which they developed discussion prompts for learners. Results: Thirty-seven educators participated in two separate workshops. The majority (71%) of preworkshop prompts were lower-order thinking skills (remembering/understanding). After the workshop, the complexity of participants' discussion prompts increased significantly. Most postworkshop prompts (69%) reflected higher-level thinking skills (apply/analyze/evaluate/create). Many participants reported that, despite previously knowing about Bloom's taxonomy, they had not known how to implement this learning framework in clinical instruction until completing the QARRD training. Discussion: The QARRD is a versatile, practical tool for health professions educators to practice promoting higher-level thinking in clinical settings. QARRD strategies allow educators to make small, purposeful adjustments to instructional methods that meaningfully engage learners to help facilitate clinical reasoning. This workshop can be delivered at other institutions and adapted as a virtual grand rounds to broadly enhance strategic questioning in clinical education.

Epithelial cell adhesion molecule in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines: a target of chemoresistence.

BACKGROUND: The low survival rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is partly attributable to its resistance to existing chemotherapeutic agents. Until now, there have been limited chemotherapeutic agents for liver cancer. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) has been found to be over-expressed during stages of carcinogenesis and has been associated with poor overall survival in many cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate EpCAM expression in HCC and evaluate the effects of EpCAM to established chemotherapy. METHODS: Three human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines--HepG2, Hep3B and HuH-7--were pre- and post-treated with doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin. Cell viability and EpCAM protein expression were measured by MTT assay and Western Blotting respectively. EpCAM positive cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. To evaluate the effects of doxorubicin efficacy on EpCAM positive cells, a small interfering RNA (siRNA) specific to EpCAM was transfected into the cells and treated with doxorubicin. RESULTS: EpCAM was significantly down-regulated by doxorubicin treatment in all three HCC cell lines (P <0.05 or 0.01). EpCAM expression was down-regulated by the 5-FU and cisplatin in HepG2 cells, however the EpCAM expression was up-regulated by 5-FU and cisplatin in Hep3B cell line. EpCAM expression was down-regulated by 5-FU, and up-regulated by cisplatin in Huh-7 cell line. Flow cytometry assay showed doxorubicin exposure decreased EpCAM positive cell quantities in three HCC cell lines. EpCAM siRNA knock-down attenuated cell mortality after doxorubicin exposure. CONCLUSION: All of these findings demonstrate that EpCAM is one of targets of chemoresistence.

Prognostic factors in melanoma patients with tumor-negative sentinel lymph nodes.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for melanoma results in accurate nodal staging, which guides treatment decisions. Patients with a negative SLN biopsy in general have a favorable prognosis, but certain subsets are at increased risk for recurrence and death. This study aimed to identify risk factors predictive of prognosis in patients with a tumor-negative SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma. METHODS: In this post-hoc analysis of data from a multicenter prospective randomized trial, clinicopathologic data of patients with cutaneous melanoma ≥1.0 mm Breslow thickness and tumor-negative SLN were analyzed. Disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and local and in-transit recurrence-free survival were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Risk factors for worse survival were identified with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: This analysis included 1,998 patients with tumor-negative SLN with a median follow-up of 70 months. Ulceration, Breslow thickness, nonextremity tumor location, and age ≥45 years were independent risk factors for worse disease-free survival and OS. Breslow thickness and ulceration were the only factors on multivariate analysis that predicted local and in-transit recurrence-free survival. Estimated 5-year OS rates ranged from 55.5 to 95.4% on the basis of the defined risk factors. CONCLUSION: There is a wide range of prognosis among patients with tumor-negative SLN. Breslow thickness, ulceration, age, and anatomic location of the primary melanoma are important independent factors predicting survival and recurrence among such patients. These factors can be used to stratify prognosis among patients with tumor-negative SLN to formulate rational long-term follow-up strategies as well as identify high-risk, SLN-negative patients for clinical trials of adjuvant therapy.

Esophageal anastomotic leak does not affect ability to receive adjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal anastomotic leak is associated with high morbidity and mortality and potentially lethal if not recognized promptly and treated aggressively. While many studies have attempted to delineate the surgical techniques associated with lower rates of anastomotic leak, few have attempted to determine its long term effects on adjuvant therapy and patient quality of life. METHODS: We reviewed our prospective 350 patient esophageal-gastric database and found 194 esophageal anastomoses performed from 1994 to 2013. Leaks were classified based on timing, severity, and location. We then compared their postoperative courses of adjuvant treatment, morbidity/mortality, and quality of life measured by Karnofsky performance status and EORTC score. Statistical correlations were calculated with χ(2) , T-test, Kaplain-Meier, ANOVA, and Cox Regression analyses as appropriate. RESULTS: Of 194 patients receiving esophageal anastomoses for cancer, 35 (18%) developed clinically diagnosed anastomotic leak 27 from esophagogastric and 8 from esophagojejunal. These groups were similar in preoperative history, preoperative staging, and type of tumor. Type of operation and variations in operative technique did not significantly affect leak rate. Patients with a leak were more likely to require intraoperative transfusion (47.1% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.013). As expected, they had a greater prevalence of perioperative complications to include pneumonia (38.6% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.001), pulmonary embolus (11.3% vs. 4.3%, P = 0.043), ileus (11.4% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.006%), empyema (11.4% vs. 0%, P > 0.001), and catheter related blood stream infections (8.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.001). Despite this increase in perioperative morbidity, there was no statistically significant difference in 90 day peri-operative mortality (2.8% vs. 2.3%) with similar ability to receive adjuvant therapy (38.6% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.303), quality of life scores (93.2 vs. 93.1, P = 0.9), and survival at 12 months (93% vs. 94%, P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: Anastomotic leak after oncologic resection does not preclude adjuvant therapy and, when managed appropriately, does not affect long term performance status or survival.

Caudate lobe resections: a single-center experience and evaluation of factors predictive of outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing frequency of liver resection for multiple types of disease, caudate lobe resection remains a rare surgical event. The goal of this study is to review our experience and evaluate possible predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing caudate lobectomy. METHODS: We reviewed a 1,900-patient prospective hepato-pancreatico-biliary database from January 2000 to December 2011, identifying 36 hepatectomy patients undergoing caudate lobe resection. Clinicopathologic characteristic and outcome data were compared using chi-square, T-test, ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Primary endpoints were the incidence and severity of complications, and secondary endpoints were blood loss, hospital stay, and transfusion requirements. Patients were also divided in two groups with group A being patients operated on before December 2007 and group B after 2007. We compared the demographics, risk factors, complication rates, and operative details between the two groups. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients underwent caudate lobe resection for cholangiocarcinoma (47.2%), metastatic colorectal cancer (36.1%), hepatocellular carcinoma (8.3%), or benign disease (8.3%). Nine patients (29%) had additional liver resection. Median overall survival (OS) was 21 months. Complications occurred in 52.7% (19/36) of patients with a median grade of 2. Tobacco abuse was associated with an increased risk of operative complications (73.3% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.03). Prior history of cardiac disease was associated with a higher complication rate (87% vs. 42%, p = 0.03). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, biliary procedures, hepatitis, and prior major abdominal surgery were not predictive of complications. Major complication was also predicted by the volume of RBC transfusion (2.7 vs. 4.1 units, p = 0.003). In our subgroup analysis of the patients undergoing surgery before and after 2007, the two groups were well matched based on age, comorbidities, and risk factors. The complication rates and rates of high-grade complications were similar, but blood loss (600 ml vs. 400 ml, p = 0.03), inflow occlusion time (Pringle time 12.6 vs. 6, p = 0.00), and hospital stay (9.5 vs. 7 days, p = 0.01) were significantly lower in group B. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection, caudate lobe resection is an effective component of surgery for hepatic disease. Tobacco use and prior cardiac history increase the risk of complications.

The impact of colorectal cancer screening in a veteran hospital population.

Colon and rectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening effectively decreases colorectal cancer mortality. This study aims to evaluate the impact of colorectal cancer screening within a Veterans Affairs Medical Center and treatment outcomes. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for a retrospective analysis of all colorectal cancer cases that were identified through the Tumor Registry of the Robley Rex VA Medical Center from 2000 to 2009. Data collected included age at diagnosis, race, risk factors, diagnosis by screening versus symptomatic evaluation, screening test, tumor location and stage, operation performed, operative mortality, and survival. A value of P < 0.05 on Fisher's exact, χ(2), analysis of variance, or Cox regression analyses was considered significant. Three hundred fifty-four patients with colorectal cancer (255 colon, 99 rectal) were identified. One hundred twenty-one patients (34%) were diagnosed by screening. In comparison with those diagnosed by symptom evaluation (n = 233), these patients had earlier stage cancers, were more likely to have a curative intent procedure, and had improved 5-year survival rates. Older patients (older than 75 years old) were more likely to present with symptoms. High-risk patients were more likely to have colonoscopic screening than fecal occult blood testing. More blacks had Stage IV disease than nonblacks. Curative intent 30-day operative mortality was 2.1 per cent for colectomy and 0 per cent for rectal resection. Screening for colorectal cancer in the veteran population allows for better survival, detection at an earlier stage, and higher likelihood of resection.

Necrotizing peripheral vasculitis/vasculopathy following the use of cocaine laced with levamisole.

The objective of this study was to describe a novel presentation of peripheral vasculitis associated with levamisole-adulterated cocaine. Cocaine abuse is widespread in the United States with 5.3 million people using cocaine in 2008. Over the past decade, drug enforcement officials have noticed the presence of levamisole in confiscated cocaine samples as an adulterant. Known side effects of cocaine-related levamisole ingestion have included agranulocytosis and a cutaneous acral purpura that is histopathologically characterized by a mixture of inflammation (vasculitis) and occlusion (vasculopathy). A 54-year-old man who nasally ingested cocaine laced with levamisole developed widespread necrotic/purpuric skin lesions on approximately 20% of his body with an acral accentuation. These lesions were complicated by multiple areas of sloughing and necrosis. He was initially treated with topical silver sulfadiazine dressing changes but progressed to require debridement and split-thickness skin grafting. Peripheral vasculitis/vasculopathy with severe necrosis resembling Coumadin necrosis is a relatively recently recognized sequelae from levamisole-adulterated cocaine use.

Impact of histology on survival in retroperitoneal sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer AJCC staging system applies to all soft-tissue sarcomas and does not allow for consideration of many features unique to retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs). The aim of this study was to analyze factors predictive of recurrence and survival for patients with resected RPSs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with primary RPS who underwent resection. A 3-tiered histological classification was examined: atypical lipomatous tumors (ALTs), non-ALT liposarcomas (LPSs), and other. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) among groups. RESULTS: Sixty RPS patients were analyzed: 16 patients (27%) had ALTs, 7 patients (12%) had LPSs, and 37 patients (62%) had other histologies. A comparison of the 3 groups showed a significant difference in OS among groups (P < .017). High-grade tumors favored shorter DFS (P = .06) but were not associated with decreased OS when compared with low-grade tumors (P = .86). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support an alternative staging system for RPS, inclusive of histology, which may prove useful in operative planning and prognostication.

Regression does not predict nodal metastasis or survival in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

Controversy exists regarding the prognostic implications of regression in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Some consider regression to be an indication for sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy because regression may result in underestimation of the true Breslow thickness. Other data support regression as a favorable prognostic indicator, representing immune system recognition of the primary tumor. This analysis was performed to determine whether regression predicts nodal metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), or overall survival (OS). Post hoc analysis was performed of a multicenter prospective randomized trial that included patients aged 18 to 70 years with cutaneous melanomas 1 mm or greater Breslow thickness. All patients underwent SLN biopsy; those with tumor-positive SLN underwent completion lymphadenectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival, univariate analysis, and multivariate analysis were performed. A total of 2220 patients (261 with regression; 1959 without regression) were included in this analysis with a median follow-up of 68 months. Patients with regression were more likely to be male, older than 50 years old, and have lower median Breslow thickness, superficial spreading histologic subtype, and a nonextremity anatomic location (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with Clark level, ulceration, lymphovascular invasion, number of SLNs removed, or SLN metastasis. On multivariate analysis, factors independently predictive of DFS included Breslow thickness, ulceration, and SLN status (P < 0.05 in all cases); the same factors along with age, gender, and anatomic tumor location were significantly associated with OS (P < 0.05 in all cases). Regression was not significantly associated with DFS (risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.27; P = 0.68) or OS (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.76-1.32; P = 0.93). These data suggest that regression is not a significant prognostic factor for patients with cutaneous melanoma and should not be used to guide clinical decision-making for such patients.