Clinical features of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia including risk factors for thrombosis. A retrospective analysis of 408 patients.

Immune mediated heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic adverse effect of heparin. However, only a subgroup of patients with HIT develops thromboembolic complications. We aimed to identify risk factors for developing HITassociated thrombosis. We analyzed a registry of patients with clinical suspicion of HIT who tested positive using a sensitive functional assay. Patient information was obtained by a standardized questionnaire. By multivariate analysis the association of age, gender, type of patient population, and magnitude of the platelet count decline with the frequency, type (venous or arterial), and temporal pattern of thrombotic events was assessed. In 408 HIT patients we observed predominance of venous thrombosis (2.4:1), with 40% of patients developing a pulmonary embolism. However, in the subgroup of post-cardiovascular surgery patients there was predominance of arterial thrombosis (1:8.5). The type of arterial thrombosis (limb artery thrombosis > thrombotic stroke > myocardial infarction) was the converse of that observed with typical atherothrombotic clots in non-HIT populations. In 59.8% of patients HIT-related thrombosis manifested either on the same day a platelet count decrease >50% was documented (26.3%) or before the decrease in platelet counts (33.5%). The most important risk factors for thrombosis were orthopedic/trauma surgery and the magnitude of platelet count decrease. HIT-associated thrombosis occurs in a considerable proportion of patients before platelet counts decrease by more than 50%.

Lepirudin for prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with acute isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: an analysis of 3 prospective studies.

This analysis of 3 prospective multicenter trials in patients with laboratory-confirmed acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) without clinically evident thromboembolic complications (TECs), isolated HIT, assessed the combined individual end points of death, new TECs, and limb amputation. Patients with the same inclusion criteria who did not receive lepirudin or danaparoid served as a contemporaneous control group. Ninety-one patients were treated with lepirudin (intravenous infusion 0.10 mg/kg/h, no bolus, activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]-adjusted to 1.5-2.5 times baseline) for a median of 11.0 days (range, 1-68 days). During the observation period (median 24 days), 13 (14.3%) deaths, 4 (4.4%) new TECs, 3 (3.3%) limb amputations (combined 18 [19.8%]), and 13 (14.3%) major bleeding events occurred. In comparison to the control group (N = 47), the combined end point (P = .0281) and new TECs (P = .02) were reduced, and major bleeding was not significantly different between groups (P = .5419). In renal impairment, lepirudin did not reach its steady state within 4 hours, and additional monitoring every 4 hours after start of lepirudin until steady state is reached is recommended. Lepirudin seems to be effective in patients with isolated HIT. Dose reductions in renal impairment are important. Keeping the aPTT in the range corresponding to 600 to 700 microg/L lepirudin during treatment may minimize bleeding complications.