Subject(s)
Books , Recovery of Function/physiology , Stroke/therapy , Adult , Humans , Male , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/psychology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The spine is the most common site for bony metastases. It can lead to the development of significant complications and morbidity if appropriate treatment is not provided. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued new guidance in 2008 with regard to the management of patient with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) to assess the awareness of the NICE guidelines for MSCC. METHODS: We contacted doctors in oncology, trauma and orthopaedics, palliative care and general medicine and assessed their knowledge of MSCC using a questionnaire based on the salient points of the NICE guidance. This was a UK-wide questionnaire. RESULTS: We contacted 96 trainee doctors (oncology, palliative care, general medicine and orthopaedics) and found that 74 % felt adequately informed to diagnose metastatic cord compression although only 11 % considered a sensory level as a potential sign of cord compression. Neurological symptoms (91 %) were the main reason for referral to a tertiary spinal service. MRI was the investigation of choice. There was a poor knowledge of metastatic scoring systems and only 8 % would consider assessing the patient's fitness for surgery. Most of the respondents felt that they had been poorly taught at undergraduate and postgraduate level on MSSC. CONCLUSION: Our audit shows that MSCC is poorly understood in general and that greater understanding of the NICE guidance is required to allow for better management of these patients and more prompt referral for appropriate surgical assessment.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence/standards , Medical Oncology/standards , Orthopedics/standards , Palliative Medicine/standards , Spinal Cord Compression/therapy , Spinal Neoplasms/secondary , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Referral and Consultation , Spinal Cord Compression/etiology , Spinal Neoplasms/therapy , United KingdomABSTRACT
The incidence of tetanus in patients with wounds is unknown; however, recently concern has been raised over the proportion of tetanus cases in which a chronic wound is the portal of entry for Clostridium tetani. Varicose ulcers, dermatosis and necrosed tumours are estimated to be the point of entry for C. tetani spores in 11-14% of three cases. Of diabetic patients in the USA who contracted tetanus, a diabetic foot ulcer was responsible in 25% of cases despite this chronic wounds have yet to be considered as a risk factor for tetanus. An audit was undertaken and a survey devised to form the basis of the data collection to assess if patients with chronic wounds are up-to-date in accordance with the tetanus immunisation programme. Over a 5-day period, the data were prospectively collected and the tetanus status of a 100 patients retrospectively analysed. The status was then compared with general practitioner (GP) records via telephone follow-up. One hundred patients (n = 100) were available in the audit period, with the majority being male (n = 51). The age range was 22-91 years old (median 70 years). Nearly half of the samples (n = 48) were diabetic, with the majority of patients (n = 35) having venous leg ulcers. Only 15% had a biopsy of their wound. The duration of wounds varied from 1 to 480 months. Patients were asked to confirm their tetanus status. Almost half of the patients were unsure of their tetanus status 48% (n = 48), almost a third 30% (n = 30) thought they were not covered and 22% (n = 22) thought they were up-to-date. After confirming with the GP records, the results were as follows: almost half of the patients, 43% (n = 43) were not covered, 33% (n = 33) were up-to-date, 13% had no immunisation records available at the GPs, 10% had no GP contact details and 1% no contact was possible. Currently, tetanus prophylaxis is given based on the vaccination history of the patient but as identified that this can prove to be unreliable. With the burden of chronic wound and ageing population set to increase, levels of protection amplify the risk of tetanus faced by those suffering from chronic wounds. Strict caution should be taken in those patients who were born before the national childhood vaccination programme, implemented in 1961. Moreover, every effort should be made to ensure that such individuals complete their primary course. By ensuring each patient is actively immunised, protection against tetanus, a potential killer, is provided.
