Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 33(4): 347-357, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38436301

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dysmenorrhea is the most common cause of gynecological pain among women that has considerable impact on quality of life and psychosocial wellbeing. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and hormonal therapies are most commonly used to treat dysmenorrhea. However, given these drugs are often associated with bothersome side effects and are less effective when there is an underlying cause contributing to dysmenorrhea (e.g. endometriosis), a patient-centered approach to managing dysmenorrhea is important. Various new drugs are currently being investigated for the treatment of primary and secondary dysmenorrhea. AREAS COVERED: This review provides an updated overview on new therapeutic targets and investigational drugs for the treatment of primary and secondary dysmenorrhea. The authors describe the clinical development and implications of these drugs. EXPERT OPINION: Among the investigative drugs discussed in this review, anti-inflammatories show the most promising results for the treatment of dysmenorrhea. However, given some trials have considerable methodological limitations, many drugs cannot be currently recommended. Research focused on understanding the mechanisms involved in menstruation and its associated symptoms will be important to identify new therapeutic targets for dysmenorrhea. Further robust clinical trials are required to better understand the efficacy and safety of investigational drugs for treating primary and secondary dysmenorrhea.


Subject(s)
Dysmenorrhea , Endometriosis , Female , Humans , Dysmenorrhea/drug therapy , Dysmenorrhea/etiology , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Endometriosis/drug therapy , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects
2.
J Clin Med ; 12(22)2023 Nov 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38002684

ABSTRACT

Endometriosis, a chronic condition affecting around 10-14% of women, is challenging to manage, due to its complex pathogenesis and limited treatment options. Research has suggested a potential role of the gut microbiota and the endocannabinoid system in the development and progression of endometriosis. This narrative review aims to explore the role of, and any potential interactions between, the endocannabinoid system (ECS) and the gut microbiota in endometriosis. This review found that both the ECS and microbiota influence endometriosis, with the former regulating inflammation and pain perception and the latter influencing immune responses and hormonal balance. There is evidence that a dysregulation of the endocannabinoid system and the gut microbiota influence endometriosis symptoms and progression via changes in CB1 receptor expression and increased circulating levels of endocannabinoids. Microbial imbalances in the gut, such as increases in Prevotella, have been directly correlated to increased bloating, a common endometriosis symptom, while increases in E. coli have supported the bacterial contamination hypothesis as a potential pathway for endometriosis pathogenesis. These microbial imbalances have been correlated with increases in inflammatory markers such as TNF-α and IL-6, both often raised in those with endometriosis. Protective effects of the ECS on the gut were observed by increases in endocannabinoids, including 2-AG, resulting in decreased inflammation and improved gut permeability. Given these findings, both the ECS and the gut microbiota may be targets for therapeutic interventions for endometriosis; however, clinical studies are required to determine effectiveness.

3.
J Psychosom Res ; 162: 111038, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36179421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Menstrual cycle-related conditions, such as dysmenorrhea and heavy bleeding, are common amongst those under 25 years. Despite having significant impact on work, education, and social activities, most do not seek medical advice, preferring to self-manage their symptoms. We aimed to determine if access to a web-based resource was a feasible and acceptable method for improving menstrual health literacy and encouraging health seeking behavior. METHODS: People were eligible to participate if they were currently living in Australia, aged 14-25 years, and had menstruated for at least 12 months. Access to the resource, comprising evidence-based information on the menstrual cycle, the Period ImPact and Pain Assessment (PIPPA) tool, and guidance on self-management options, was provided for three menstrual cycles. RESULTS: Seventy-five participants with a mean age of 20.4 years were enrolled with 56 (75%) providing pre and post measures. Recruitment rate and retention rates met pre-specified criteria for feasibility. Eighty five percent of the participants reported the web-based resource was easy to use, and 90% reported they found the information provided 'very helpful'. Just under half (48%) reported the resource changed what they thought was a 'normal' period. Forty-three percent visited their doctor regarding their menstrual symptoms during the study period, with 84% indicating that they made the appointment due to the resource; over half (56%) who visited their doctor received a referral to a gynecologist. CONCLUSION: Access to a web-based resource on menstrual health literacy was found to be acceptable and feasible to young people and may encourage health-seeking behavior.


Subject(s)
Health Literacy , Self-Management , Adolescent , Adult , Dysmenorrhea/diagnosis , Dysmenorrhea/therapy , Female , Humans , Internet , Menstruation , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...