Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 15: 4707-4714, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34938067

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Current guidance states that access to cataract surgery should not be restricted by visual acuity (VA); nevertheless, 6/12 is used as a cut-off criterion in some health institutions. This study aims to determine the benefits of performing cataract surgery in patients with VA of 6/9 or better in both eyes; determine whether these benefits change over time; and compare the benefit observed between early first eye and second eye surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty adults with VA at least 6/9 in the worst eye and no ocular comorbidity were recruited. The Visual Function Index (VF-14) and Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaires were conducted pre-operatively, 4 months post-operatively, and 12 months post-operatively. The t-test or a non-parametric equivalent was used to compare averages between groups. RESULTS: The mean change in VF-14 from baseline to 4 months was 16.43 (95% CI 12.49-20.50, p < 0.001) and the median change in IVI was 6.5 (IQR 9.75, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between 4-month and 12-month follow-up (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the change in visual function between the first and second eye surgery (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that visual function improves after cataract surgery in patients with pre-operative VA of 6/9 or better. The improvement observed was clinically significant and unchanged a year after surgery. Visual function improved after second eye as much as after first eye surgery. Assessing patient reported visual function may give a more realistic indication of the benefit of early cataract surgery than relying on VA alone.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(10): e710-e713, 2020 12 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32266388

ABSTRACT

Among 200 patients developing hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) outside the intensive care unit, 61% were treated empirically without broad-spectrum Gram-negative coverage, with clinical cure in 69.7%. Lower disease severity markers (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, hypoxia, tachypnoea, neutrophilia) and the absence of diabetes mellitus and prior doxycycline treatment (but not the time to HAP onset) identified patients not requiring broad-spectrum Gram-negative coverage.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Cross Infection , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia , Pneumonia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/drug therapy , Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia/epidemiology , Hospitals , Humans , Pneumonia/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...