Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Sci Total Environ ; 408(1): 50-6, 2009 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19819526

ABSTRACT

Environmental site assessments involve, among other things, characterization of the nature and extent of contamination. In general, environmental assessors are interested in empirical methodologies that can be applied to a broad range of environmental media (e.g., soils, sediments, etc.) and situations. To date, no unified guidance has been adopted, and site investigations usually involve a tiered process with multiple analyses. We propose a multivariate analysis methodology utilizing discriminant analysis with clustered chemical concentrations as a novel application to environmental site assessments that determine, in relative order of magnitude, contaminated chemicals. Finite mixture models are presented as a means to assess latent chemical clusters with some basis in statistical inference. The methodology is illustrated with a typical localized data set containing total metal and metalloid (i.e., chemical) concentrations, extracted from bulk soil collected from reference and site-related locations, obtained from a former military installation in the southeast United States. The illustration is particularly applicable because site-related soils inherently possessed higher background chemical levels than reference soils, which biased conventional analyses. However, contrasting chemical compositions were inferred within site-related samples illustrating the versatility of the proposed methodology. Using these results along with known information regarding the history of contamination at the site, a qualitative and quantitative assessment of contaminated chemicals was made. Results are intended for illustration purposes only and are discussed within the context of environmental site assessment.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Geologic Sediments/analysis , Metals/analysis , Soil Pollutants/analysis , Cluster Analysis , Discriminant Analysis , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Geography , Geologic Sediments/chemistry , Multivariate Analysis , Risk Assessment , Soil Pollutants/chemistry , Southeastern United States
2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 13(1): 99-114, 1991 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2024049

ABSTRACT

A total of 473 air samples from 71 schools scheduled for abatement (328 indoor static samples, 51 personal samples, and 94 outdoor samples) were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy techniques. Six measures of asbestos-in-air concentration were considered: (1) total asbestos structures per cubic centimeter: (2) chrysotile structures per cubic centimeter; (3) amphibole structures per cubic centimeter; (4) structures per cubic centimeter at least 0.5 micron long and at least five times wide; (5) structures per cubic centimeter at least 5 microns long; and (6) structures per cubic centimeter at least 5 microns long and at least 0.2 micron wide. The average concentration of chrysotile structures in indoor air samples was 0.017 structures/cm3; the average concentration of amphibole structures was 0.0015 structure/cm3. Ninety-five percent of structures found were chrysotile. The average concentrations of all structures were significantly higher indoors than outdoors (P less than 0.001). The average concentration of structures more than 5 microns long indoors was 0.00023 structure/cm3. None of the following factors were significantly correlated with asbestos concentrations in air: type of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) present, condition of ACM, accessibility of ACM to students, whether ACM were covered, air flow, or whether sweeping was noted during sample collection. In addition, asbestos-in-air concentrations were not significantly different in different types of schools (high, intermediate or elementary) or in schools constructed in different time periods. Lastly, there was no correlation between the mineral type of asbestos found in the air and the type found in samples of bulk material.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Air/analysis , Asbestos/analysis , Schools , Air Pollution/legislation & jurisprudence , Risk , United States , United States Environmental Protection Agency
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 10(1): 51-62, 1989 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2772269

ABSTRACT

Data from a recent EPA study of airborne asbestos levels in 49 buildings occupied by the General Services Administration (GSA) are statistically analyzed. The study focuses on differences between indoor and outdoor levels, and on differences among buildings with no asbestos-containing material (ACM) (6 buildings), buildings with ACM generally in good condition (6 buildings), and buildings containing damaged ACM (37 buildings). Seven indoor samples and a single outdoor sample were collected from most buildings and analyzed by TEM (transmission electron microscopy) using a direct preparation method. No statistically significant differences were detected in asbestos levels between indoors and outdoors or among the three categories of buildings. The average indoor concentration of asbestos was 0.00073 fibers/cc (f/cc) for all fibers and 0.00007 f/cc for fibers 5 microns or longer. The current OSHA occupational standard is 0.2 f/cc for fibers 5 microns or longer as measured by phase-contrast microscopy.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants, Occupational/analysis , Asbestos/analysis , Filtration , Monte Carlo Method , Quality Control , Random Allocation , Statistics as Topic , United States , United States Environmental Protection Agency
5.
Fundam Appl Toxicol ; 11(4): 652-63, 1988 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3229589

ABSTRACT

Standard statistical treatment of data from carcinogenicity bioassays generally involves separate analyses of data from many tumor responses in each sex in two species. There are two serious difficulties with this approach: the excessive probability of one or more false positive findings due to the large number of individual tests applied and the lack of mutual support among the separate tests (e.g., results that are close to significant from several organs should be allowed to reinforce each other, but such mutual support does not formally occur in statistical tests currently employed). In this paper we propose a class of tests that deals with both of these difficulties. The test statistics proposed are functions of p values from multiple conventional tests. The significance levels are computed by a Monte Carlo randomization procedure that treats individual animals (rather than tumor-specific response scores) as units of variation, so that the assumption of independence of tumors at different sites is not required. A single overall test statistic is derived from results from all individual tumor sites; thus there is proper control for the false positive rate. Mutual support from results from different tumor sites can be obtained by using a test statistic such as the product of the K smallest p values from conventional tests. Suggestions are made regarding specific tests that could be applied routinely to carcinogenesis bioassay data. The usefulness of the proposed tests is demonstrated by applying them to data from a National Toxicology Program bioassay of decabromodiphenyl oxide.


Subject(s)
Carcinogenicity Tests , Neoplasms/chemically induced , Animals , Female , Male , Mice , Random Allocation , Rats , Sex Factors , Species Specificity , Statistics as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...