Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, chronic illness associated with substantial disability and economic burden. Although a number of effective antidepressants are available, the need for new medications that are effective and well tolerated remains. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. A post hoc pooled analysis was conducted to evaluate this study in the context of all similarly designed, completed studies with the 2 doses. METHODS: This was an 8-week, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, duloxetine-referenced, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial conducted in 21 centers across the United States. Duloxetine was included for assay sensitivity as a positive control; the study was not designed or powered to compare desvenlafaxine with duloxetine. Participants were outpatients aged > or =18 years with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition-defined MDD and a 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D(17)) score > or =20. Patients were randomly assigned at baseline to fixed-dose desvenlafaxine (50 or 100 mg/d), fixed-dose duloxetine (60 mg/d), or placebo. The primary outcome measure was HAM-D(17) total score at the final evaluation. Additional measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) score, Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score, and 6-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Bech version (HAM-D(6)). Tolerability assessments included discontinuation rates, adverse events (AEs), vital signs, and laboratory tests. The post hoc pooled analysis was performed using data from the current study and 2 previously published, positive studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d with placebo for MDD. The design and methodologies of the 2 studies were similar to the methodology of the current trial, other than not including a reference compound. RESULTS: Of the 925 patients who were screened, 287 did not meet entry criteria, and 638 patients enrolled in the study; the intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 615 patients who were evaluated for efficacy (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-40.7 [12.1-13.2] years; mean weight range, 83.3-87.0 [22.8-23.9] kg; female sex, 398 [64.7%]; white race, 458 [74.5%]). The primary end point did not reach significance based on the global F test for controlling multiplicity of the desvenlafaxine doses. Based on pairwise comparison, significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed in the desven-lafaxine 100 mg/d (-10.5; P = 0.028, unadjusted for multiple comparisons) and duloxetine 60 mg/d groups (-10.3; P = 0.047) compared with placebo (-8.7). Desvenlafaxine 100 mg/d and duloxetine 60 mg/d were associated with significantly better scores compared with placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, CGI-S, and HAM-D(6). No significant differences were observed in any scale between the desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and placebo groups. Discontinuation rates due to AEs were 5%, 7%, 13%, and 6% for the desvenlafaxine 50-mg/d, desvenlafaxine 100-mg/d, duloxetine 60-mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. The ITT population from all 3 studies in the pooled analysis consisted of 1388 patients (mean [SD] age range, 38.8-45.7 [12.1-12.6] years; mean weight range, 73.1-87.0 [17.6-23.9] kg; female sex, 896 [64.6%]; white race, 1136 [81.8%]). Significantly greater improvements on the HAM-D(17) were observed for desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d (-11.5; P < 0.001) and 100 mg/d (-11.8; P < 0.001) versus placebo (-9.6). Both doses were significantly better than placebo on the CGI-I, MADRS, and HAM-D(6). CONCLUSIONS: The current study failed to meet its primary efficacy end point based on the a priori analysis plan. Desvenlafaxine was generally well tolerated. A post hoc pooled analysis of this trial and 2 previously published trials with both desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d found both doses to be effective for MDD compared with placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: 00384033.

Nicotine upregulates the expression of P2Y12 on vascular cells and megakaryoblasts.

BACKGROUND: P2Y12 is the major platelet receptor that mediates ADP-induced aggregation. P2Y12 is also expressed by vascular cells. The factors that regulate P2Y12 expression have not been determined. Since nicotine (NIC) has effects on platelet activation and vascular function, and because nicotinic and purinerigic receptors may interact, we determined whether nicotine altered P2Y12 expression. METHODS: Four cell lines (human coronary artery endothelial cells, HCAEC; human umbilical vein endothelial cells, HUVEC; human aortic smooth muscle cells, HASMC; and human megakaryoblastic cells, MEG-01) were cultured in the absence or presence of nicotine. Immunoblotting for P2Y12, P2Y2, and actin was performed. RESULTS: Nicotine, at concentrations of 0.1-1.0 microM, induced P2Y12 (but not P2Y2) expression in all the four cell lines. HASMC exhibited the greatest induction with a sixfold mean increase in P2Y12 expression in response to 0.25 microM nicotine. The induction was inhibited by nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists. Healthy smokers were observed to have higher P2Y12 expression in platelet lysates compared to non-smokers. CONCLUSION: Nicotine induces the expression of P2Y12 in vascular cells and megakaryoblasts, and is mediated by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Smokers exhibit higher platelet P2Y12, possibly mediated via nicotine. These results may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of cigarette smoking on platelet activation and the vessel wall. CONDENSED ABSTRACT: The factors that regulate the expression of P2Y12, the platelet ADP receptor, have not been determined. Four cell lines (human coronary artery endothelial cells, HCAEC; human umbilical vein endothelial cells, HUVEC; human aortic smooth muscle cells, HASMC; and human megakaryoblastic cells, MEG-01) were cultured in the absence or presence of nicotine. Nicotine, at concentrations of 0.1-1.0 microM, induced P2Y12 expression in all the four cell lines. HASMC exhibited the greatest induction with a sixfold mean increase in P2Y12 expression in response to 0.25 microM nicotine. The induction was inhibited by nicotinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists. Healthy smokers were observed to have higher P2Y12 expression in platelet lysates compared to non-smokers. These results may contribute to a better understanding of the effects of cigarette smoking on platelet activation and the vessel wall.

Effect of losartan and hydrochlorothiazide on exercise tolerance in exertional hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.

A randomized, double-blind study of 6 months of losartan 50 mg or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg was performed in 40 subjects with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (mitral flow velocity E/A ratio < 1), exercise systolic blood pressure (BP) > 200 mm Hg, systolic BP at rest < 150 mm Hg, ejection fraction > 50%, and no ischemia. Before treatment, exercise systolic BP was 213 +/- 13 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) in the 19 patients randomized to losartan and 209 +/- 11 mm Hg in the 21 patients who received HCTZ. After 6 months, exercise systolic BP was similarly reduced in patients who received losartan (197 +/- 23 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and HCTZ (191 +/- 11 mm Hg, p < 0.01). With losartan, treadmill exercise time increased from 894 +/- 216 to 951 +/- 225 seconds (p = 0.011), and quality of life improved from 15 +/- 12 to 7 +/- 10 (p = 0.015) without a change in oxygen consumption (1,895 +/- 470 to 1,954 +/- 539 ml/min, p = 0.30). With HCTZ, exercise time (842 +/- 225 to 872 +/- 239 seconds, p = 0.32) and quality of life (19 +/- 21 vs 19 +/- 24, p = 0.43) did not change, whereas oxygen consumption decreased from 2,144 +/- 788 to 1,960 +/- 706 ml/min (p = 0.022). In conclusion, in patients with diastolic dysfunction and hypertensive responses to exercise, 6 months of losartan and HCTZ blunted systolic BP during exercise. Only losartan increased exercise tolerance and improved quality of life.

Contribution of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction to heart failure regardless of ejection fraction.

Heart failure (HF) has been classified as systolic and diastolic based on the left ventricular ejection fraction. We hypothesized that left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is an important element of HF regardless of ejection fraction. Two hundred six patients who had clinical HF were compared with 72 age-matched controls. Diastolic dysfunction, as assessed by the mitral filling pattern and tissue Doppler imaging, was present in >90% of patients who had HF regardless of ejection fraction and was more frequent and severe than in age-matched controls (p <0.001). In patients who had HF, B-type natriuretic peptide correlated with diastolic dysfunction (r = 0.62, p <0.001) but not with ejection fraction or end-diastolic volume index (EDVI). The degree of diastolic dysfunction influenced survival rate (risk ratio 1.64, p <0.05), whereas ejection fraction and EDVI did not. Systolic function measured by systolic mitral annular velocity was decreased in patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 (6.6 +/- 1.8 cm/s) compared with control subjects (8.0 +/- 2.1 cm/s, p <0.01). Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction >/=0.50 had an increased ratio of ventricular mass to EDVI. Patients who had HF and an ejection fraction /=0.50 is associated with mild systolic dysfunction and an increased ratio of left ventricular mass to EDVI. In HF with an ejection fraction

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Recent advancements in magnetic resonance imaging hardware and software permit the assessment of cardiovascular structure and function at rest and during exercise or pharmacology-induced cardiac stress. With these developments, knowledge of cardiovascular imaging protocols in the magnetic resonance imaging environment is critical for nursing personnel. The purpose of this article is to review information pertinent to working in a magnetic resonance imaging environment and to describe the requirements of nursing personnel performing cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging examinations.

Relation of anemia to diastolic heart failure and the effect on outcome.

We evaluated the frequency and importance of anemia in 137 patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure). We found that anemia is common in these patients and is associated with greater elevations in serum B-type natriuretic peptide, more severe diastolic dysfunction, and a worse prognosis.

Effect of candesartan and verapamil on exercise tolerance in diastolic dysfunction.

Diastolic dysfunction may be exacerbated by increased systolic blood pressure (SBP) during exercise. Ang II may contribute to this process. We performed a randomized, double-blind, crossover study of two weeks of candesartan (16 mg) and verapamil (SR 160 mg). The 21 subjects were 64 +/- 10 years old with ejection fraction greater than 50%, no ischemia, mitral flow velocity E/A less than 1, normal resting SBP (< 150 mm Hg), and SBP greater than 200 mm Hg during exercise. Exercise tolerance was assessed using a Modified Bruce Protocol at baseline and after each two-week treatment period, separated by a two-week washout period. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire. During exercise, Ang II levels increased from 29 +/- 18 to 33 +/- 18 pg/ml (P < 0.05). SBP during exercise was 213 +/- 9 mm Hg at baseline and similarly reduced by candesartan (198 +/- 18, P < 0.01) and verapamil (197 +/- 14, P < 0.01). With candesartan, exercise time increased from 793 +/- 182 seconds to 845 +/- 163 seconds (P < 0.05), and QOL improved from 11 +/- 14 to 5 +/- 6 (P < 0.05). In contrast, verapamil did not significantly improve exercise time or QOL. In patients with mild diastolic dysfunction at rest and a hypertensive response to exercise, both Ang II receptor blockade and verapamil blunted the hypertensive response to exercise. Ang II blockade increased exercise tolerance and improved QOL.