ABSTRACT
To survey the types of suspect infections, the antibiotic utilization and the patterns of antibiotic resistance among bacterial pathogens in a community Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF), we conducted a 20-month prospective observational surveillance program comprising all 585 patients admitted to a 149-bed private community SNF. Data were collected form medical charts, laboratory reports and nurses reports. Overall, 41% of the patients developed at least one presumptive nosocomial infection, and 54% of the patients received one or more antibiotic treatments. The overall presumptive nosocomial infection rate was 7.2 per 1000 patient days. The most common sites of presumptive nosocomial infection were the urinary tract (38%) and the respiratory tract (28%). The most common pathogens overall were E. coli (25%). Antibiotic groups used most frequently were the quinolones (22% of prescriptions). Thirty-nine percent of the Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with suspected infections were resistant to methicillin, and of these 94% were also resistant to ciprofloxacin. Most of the resistant S. aureus isolates were from indwelling catheter-associated with UTIs. Infections associated with quinolone resistant strains of gram-negative bacilli were infrequent. No epidemiologic evidence of nosocomial clustering was apparent.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Community Health Centers , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Infection Control/methods , Skilled Nursing Facilities , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , California , Child , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Utilization , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
We report here a pilot survey of colonization with methicillin- and/or ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus species on hands of nursing personnel in a private skilled-nursing facility. We found only one nurses aide who carried methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and one who carried ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus, each on only one of the surveys. None of the control nonmedical personnel were found to carry methicillin-resistant S. aureus or ciprofloxacin-resistant S. aureus. The colonization rate of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci on the hands of medical personnel was 59%, compared with 13% for the nonmedical personnel, and the counts of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci were also significantly higher for nursing personnel. For ciprofloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, 30% of nursing personnel had positive cultures whereas no ciprofloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci strains were recovered from the nonmedical control cohort. Three of the patients had presumptive infections with methicillin- or ciprofloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, all urinary tract infections. Personnel hands represent a likely mode of transmission of such strains between patients, and skilled-nursing facility patients may represent a reservoir for carrying the coagulase-negative staphylococci back to acute care facilities.
