Impact of dyspnea and physiologic function on general health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship among clinical dyspnea ratings, physiologic pulmonary function, and general health status in symptomatic patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: Observational data collected at a baseline state. SETTING: Outpatient pulmonary disease clinics at a university hospital and two VA medical centers. PATIENTS: One hundred ten male patients with COPD with no significant comorbidity were recruited. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Clinical ratings of dyspnea were measured by the multidimensional baseline dyspnea index (BDI). Pulmonary function tests included forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax). General health status was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study short-form survey, which consists of 20 questions that cover six health components. The mean age of the patients was 67 +/- 8 yr (+/- SD). The mean value for FVC was 2.84 +/- 0.84 L (68 +/- 18 percent of predicted), for FEV1 was 1.28 +/- 0.59 L (44 +/- 17 percent of predicted), and for PImax was 59.0 +/- 25.0 cm H2O. The BDI score and PImax were significantly correlated with five of the six components of general health status. Only three of the six components of general health were significantly correlated with FEV1 as percent predicted (rs value range, 0.30 to 0.44) and with FVC as percent predicted (rs value range, 0.25 to 0.33). Statistical comparisons showed that the BDI score had significantly higher correlations than FVC (percent predicted), FEV1 (percent predicted), and PImax values with physical functioning and role functioning. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the BDI score was the only statistically significant predictor of role functioning, mental health, and health perceptions for general health status, whereas both the BDI score and FEV1 (percent predicted) were independent predictors of physical functioning and social functioning. CONCLUSION: Dyspnea ratings influence and predict general health status to a greater extent than do physiologic measurements in symptomatic patients with COPD. A shift in focus from the pathophysiology of disease to assessment and relief of symptoms may provide more meaningful benefits for the individual patient in terms of quality of life. This consideration requires that health-care providers use available measuring tools in clinical practice to quantify symptoms, as well as overall health status.

Measurement of breathlessness during exercise in asthmatics. Predictor variables, reliability, and responsiveness.

The purpose of this study was to determine the predictor variables for breathlessness and to investigate the criteria of reliability and responsiveness for measuring breathlessness during progressive, incremental exercise on the cycle ergometer. We studied a heterogeneous group of patients with stable asthma (mean +/- SEM age, 46 +/- 4 yr) for four visits at weekly intervals. Predictor variables were determined at the first visit. Nine independent physiologic variables were obtained at each minute during exercise; the Borg rating of breathlessness (range 0 to 10) was used as the dependent variable. The regression model relating the physiologic parameters to the Borg rating of breathlessness was highly significant (model F = 43.4; p = 0.0001). Backward elimination selected the strongest predictors of the Borg rating: peak inspiratory flow (VI); tidal volume (VT)/FVC; frequency of respiration (f); and peak inspiratory mouth pressures (Pm). These four variables explained 63% of the variance in the rating of dyspnea. Each of the four variables exhibited a linear relationship with the Borg rating. Test-retest reliability was assessed by comparing results at the first and second visits. Individual slopes (except for VT/FVC) and intercepts for the four predictor variables versus Borg ratings were highly reliable. The slope for work intensity (watts) and Borg ratings, but not the intercept, was highly reliable. Responsiveness was evaluated by randomly administering inhaled methacholine or inhaled metaproterenol, alternately, at the third and fourth visits to induce acute changes in lung function before exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)