Perioperative use of physostigmine to reduce opioid consumption and peri-incisional hyperalgesia: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that cholinergic mechanisms play a pivotal role in the anti-nociceptive system by acting synergistically with morphine and reducing postoperative opioid consumption. In addition, the anti-cholinesterase drug physostigmine that increases synaptic acetylcholine concentrations has anti-inflammatory effects. METHODS: In this randomised placebo-controlled trial including 110 patients undergoing nephrectomy, we evaluated the effects of intraoperative physostigmine 0.5 mg h-1 i.v. for 24 h on opioid consumption, hyperalgesia, pain scores, and satisfaction with pain control. RESULTS: Physostigmine infusion did not affect opioid consumption compared with placebo. However, the mechanical pain threshold was significantly higher (2.3 [sd 0.3]) vs 2.2 [0.4]; P=0.0491), and the distance from the suture line of hyperalgesia (5.9 [3.3] vs 8.5 [4.6]; P=0.006), wind-up ratios (2.2 [1.5] vs 3.1 [1.5]; P=0.0389), and minimum and maximum postoperative pain scores at 24 h (minimum 1.8 [1.0] vs 2.4 [1.2]; P=0.0451; and maximum 3.2 [1.4] vs 4.2 [1.4]; P=0.0081) and 48 h (minimum 0.9 [1.0] vs 1.6 [1.1]; P=0.0101; and maximum 2.0 [1.5] vs 3.2 [1.6]; P=0.0029) were lower in the study group. Pain Disability Index was lower and satisfaction with pain control was higher after 3 months in the physostigmine group. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous trials, physostigmine did not reduce opioid consumption. As pain thresholds were higher and hyperalgesia and wind-up lower in the physostigmine group, we conclude that physostigmine has anti-hyperalgesic effects and attenuates sensitisation processes. Intraoperative physostigmine may be a useful and safe addition to conventional postoperative pain control. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2012-000130-19.

Does Platelet Reactivity Predict Bleeding in Patients Needing Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting During Dual Antiplatelet Therapy?

BACKGROUND: Up to 15% of patients require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) during dual antiplatelet therapy. Available evidence suggests an association between platelet reactivity and CABG-related bleeding. However, platelet reactivity cutoffs for bleeding remain elusive. We sought to explore the association between platelet reactivity and bleeding. METHODS: Patients on aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor within 48 hours before isolated CABG (n = 149) were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood was drawn 2 to 4 hours preoperatively and platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay, Multiplate analyzer and Innovance PFA2Y. The primary endpoint was calculated red blood cell loss computed as follows: (blood volume × preoperative hematocrit × 0.91) - (blood volume × hematocrit × 0.91 on postoperative day 5) + (mL of transfused red blood cells × 0.59). RESULTS: Preoperative platelet reactivity was low [median (interquartile range): LTA: 20 (9-28)%; VASP-PRI: 39 (15-73)%; Multiplate adenosine phosphate test: 16 (12-22) U∗min]. Innovance PFA2Y ≥300 seconds, 72%. Median (IQR) red blood cell loss in patients in first the LTA tertile was 1,449 (1,020 to 1,754) mL compared with 1,107 (858 to 1,512) mL and 1,075 (811 to 1,269) mL in those in the second and third tertiles, respectively (p < 0.004). Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC)-4 bleeding differed between tertiles (62% versus 46% versus 36%; p = 0.037). In a multivariable linear regression model, aspirin dose ≥300 mg, cardiopulmonary bypass time, EuroSCORE, and tertile distribution of platelet reactivity were significantly associated with red blood cell loss. CONCLUSIONS: A gradual decrease in red blood cell loss and BARC-4 bleeding occurs with increasing platelet reactivity in patients on antiplatelet therapy undergoing CABG. Our findings support current guidelines to determine time of surgery based on an objective measurement of platelet function (Platelet Inhibition and Bleeding in Patients Undergoing Emergent Cardiac Surgery; clinicaltrials.gov NCT01468597).

The Effect of the Modified Lateral Suprascapular Block on Shoulder Function in Patients With Chronic Shoulder Pain.

BACKGROUND: Suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) is commonly used in pain therapy for patients with chronic shoulder pain. The effect of SSNB on shoulder function has, however, not been investigated so far. If in shoulder function, i.e. the range of motion is increased after application of the nerve block, it can be expected that subsequent physiotherapy, besides being less painful, is also more effective in terms of restoring shoulder mobility. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to evaluate the effect of SSNB on shoulder function, in patients with chronic shoulder pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were evaluated using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and number rating scale values for pain. The SSN was blocked using the Feigl approach, with 5 ml ropivacaine 0.5%. Shoulder function and pain were assessed 60 minutes and 24 hours after the block. RESULTS: Totally, 20 patients completed the study. The CMS and pain scores significantly improved after the block. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the modified lateral SSNB of Feigl significantly reduces pain and increases shoulder function, in chronic shoulder pain.

N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptides' Prognostic Utility Is Overestimated in Meta-analyses Using Study-specific Optimal Diagnostic Thresholds.

BACKGROUND: N-terminal fragment B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) prognostic utility is commonly determined post hoc by identifying a single optimal discrimination threshold tailored to the individual study population. The authors aimed to determine how using these study-specific post hoc thresholds impacts meta-analysis results. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of studies reporting the ability of preoperative NT-proBNP measurements to predict the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and nonfatal myocardial infarction at 30 days after noncardiac surgery. Individual patient-level data NT-proBNP thresholds were determined using two different methodologies. First, a single combined NT-proBNP threshold was determined for the entire cohort of patients, and a meta-analysis conducted using this single threshold. Second, study-specific thresholds were determined for each individual study, with meta-analysis being conducted using these study-specific thresholds. RESULTS: The authors obtained individual patient data from 14 studies (n = 2,196). Using a single NT-proBNP cohort threshold, the odds ratio (OR) associated with an increased NT-proBNP measurement was 3.43 (95% CI, 2.08 to 5.64). Using individual study-specific thresholds, the OR associated with an increased NT-proBNP measurement was 6.45 (95% CI, 3.98 to 10.46). In smaller studies (<100 patients) a single cohort threshold was associated with an OR of 5.4 (95% CI, 2.27 to 12.84) as compared with an OR of 14.38 (95% CI, 6.08 to 34.01) for study-specific thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Post hoc identification of study-specific prognostic biomarker thresholds artificially maximizes biomarker predictive power, resulting in an amplification or overestimation during meta-analysis of these results. This effect is accentuated in small studies.