Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Glob Public Health ; 17(12): 3944-3966, 2022 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816635

ABSTRACT

The increase in pesticide consumption has a negative health impact. Studies point to an association between exposure to pesticides and cardiovascular disease (CVD), one of the leading causes of world mortality. This review synthesize evidence on the association between occupational exposure and environmental contamination by pesticides with CVDs from 1750 references databases (EBSCO, Medline, Science Direct, Scielo, Lilacs and Ovid) without date or language restriction. Selected 24 articles by PRISMA and Downs & Black methodologies, were included from inclusion criteria: original studies (case-control, cohort or cross-sectional design); clear CVD definition and exposure to pesticides; representative sample of the target population. The results show the occupational exposure to pesticides chlorpyrifos, coumafos, carbofuran, ethylene bromide, mancozeb, ziram, metalaxyl, pendimethalin and trifluralin was associated a risk of 1.8 to 3.2 for acute myocardial infarction. Primaphos, fenitrothion, malathion and deltamethrin pesticides were associated with a blood pressure increase. Environmental contamination by tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin was associated with CVD with risk of 1.09 to 2.78 and organochlorine, 1.19 to 4.54; heavy metals, arsenic, trimethylarsine and dimethylarsinic acid with atherosclerosis and systemic arterial hypertension. These findings point to the association between exposure to pesticides and CVD, signaling the importance of greater rigor in the public policy related to pesticides.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Occupational Exposure , Pesticides , Humans , Pesticides/toxicity , Pesticides/analysis , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31159344

ABSTRACT

Objective: The goal of this study was to systematically review risk factors for workplace bullying. Methods: The search was carried out in two databases. Studies with estimates of risk factors for workplace bullying were included in the review. We assessed the quality of the selected studies using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were used for reporting papers. Results: Fifty-one papers were included, and 70.6% were from European countries. Women were reported to be at higher risk of being bullied in most studies (odds ratio (OR) from 1.17 to 2.77). Authoritarian and laissez-faire leadership styles were positively associated with bullying. Several psychosocial factors, such as stress (OR from 1.37 to 4.96), and occupational risks related to work organization, such as flexible work methods, role conflict, role ambiguity, monotonous or rotating tasks, high demands, pressure of work, and unclarity of duties were strongly associated with bullying. Discussion: The findings highlight the central role of organizational factors in bullying. Policies to prevent bullying must address the culture of organizations, facing the challenge of developing a new management and leadership framework.


Subject(s)
Bullying/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Humans , Leadership , Organizational Culture , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Workplace/psychology
3.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 9: 1595-603, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26357460

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess asthenopia prevalence and associated factors in schoolchildren aged 6-16. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of all children attending the first to eighth grades at two public schools in the urban region of a medium-sized town in Southern Brazil between April and December 2012. A questionnaire on socioeconomic and cultural matters was answered by parents, while the children answered a questionnaire on asthenopia-related symptoms. The children underwent a complete visual function examination, including measurement of visual acuity, refraction test, cover test, stereopsis, heterophoria assessment, near point of convergence, and accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio. RESULTS: Asthenopia prevalence was 24.7% in a total sample of 964 children. Visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes was found in 92.8% of the children. The stereopsis test was normal in 99.4% of them, and some kind of strabismus was found in 3.5%. About 37.8% had astigmatism, 71.6% had mild hyperopia, 13.6% had moderate hyperopia, and 6.1% were myopic. Near point of convergence was abnormal in 14.0% of the children, and the accommodative convergence/accommodation ratio was found to be altered in 17.1% of them. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents have expressive prevalence of asthenopia. The prevalence of visual function alterations does not differ from the general population, and, therefore, they are not prerequisites. It is very important that its mechanisms and risk factors be better defined. Health professionals need to be on the lookout for complaints of visual fatigue because of its potential to influence learning and school performance.

4.
J. pediatr. (Rio J.) ; 91(4): 320-325, July-Aug. 2015. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-759351

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of asthenopia in 0-18 year-old children through a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies.SOURCES: Inclusion criteria were population-based studies from 1960 to May of 2014 reporting the prevalence of asthenopia in children. The search was performed independently by two reviewers in the PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases, with no language restriction. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the PRISMA Statement. Downs and Black score was used for quality assessment.SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: Out of 1692 potentially relevant citations retrieved from electronic databases and searches of reference lists, 26 were identified as potentially eligible. Five of these studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 2465 subjects. Pooled prevalence of asthenopia was 19.7% (12.4-26.4%). The majority of children with asthenopia did not present visual acuity or refraction abnormalities. The largest study evaluated 1448 children aged 6 years and estimated a prevalence of 12.6%. Associated risk factors were not clearly established.CONCLUSION: Although asthenopia is a frequent and relevant clinical problem in childhood, with potential consequences for learning, the scarcity of studies about the prevalence and clinical impact of asthenopia hinders the effective planning of public health measures.


OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência de astenopia em crianças até 18 anos por meio de uma análise sistemática e uma metanálise dos estudos de prevalência.FONTES DOS DADOS: Os critérios de inclusão foram estudos de base populacional de 1960 a maio de 2014 que relataram prevalência de astenopia em crianças. A busca foi feita de maneira independente por dois analisadores nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase e Lilacs, sem restrição de idioma. Essa análise sistemática foi feita de acordo com as diretrizes da Colaboração Cochrane e com a Declaração dos Itens de Relatório Preferidos para Análises Sistemáticas e Metanálise (Prisma). A escala Downs & Black foi usada para avaliação da qualidade.SÍNTESE DOS DADOS: De 1.692 citações possivelmente relevantes recuperadas de bases de dados eletrônicas e buscas de listas de referência, 26 foram identificadas como possivelmente elegíveis. Cinco desses estudos atenderam aos critérios de inclusão e incluíram 2.465 indivíduos. A prevalência total de astenopia foi de 19,7% (12,4-26,4%). A maioria das crianças com astenopia não apresentava anomalias de acuidade visual ou refração. O maior estudo avaliou 1.448 crianças de seis anos, com prevalência estimada de 12,6%. Os fatores de risco associados não foram claramente estabelecidos.CONCLUSÃO: Embora a astenopia seja um problema clínico frequente e relevante na infância, com possíveis consequências para o aprendizado, a escassez de estudos sobre a prevalência e o impacto clínico da astenopia prejudica o planejamento efetivo das medidas de saúde pública.


Subject(s)
Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Asthenopia/epidemiology , Asthenopia/diagnosis , Early Diagnosis , Observational Studies as Topic , Prevalence , Selection Bias
5.
J Pediatr (Rio J) ; 91(4): 320-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25986614

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of asthenopia in 0-18 year-old children through a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies. SOURCES: Inclusion criteria were population-based studies from 1960 to May of 2014 reporting the prevalence of asthenopia in children. The search was performed independently by two reviewers in the PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS databases, with no language restriction. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration guidelines and the PRISMA Statement. Downs and Black score was used for quality assessment. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS: Out of 1692 potentially relevant citations retrieved from electronic databases and searches of reference lists, 26 were identified as potentially eligible. Five of these studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 2465 subjects. Pooled prevalence of asthenopia was 19.7% (12.4-26.4%). The majority of children with asthenopia did not present visual acuity or refraction abnormalities. The largest study evaluated 1448 children aged 6 years and estimated a prevalence of 12.6%. Associated risk factors were not clearly established. CONCLUSION: Although asthenopia is a frequent and relevant clinical problem in childhood, with potential consequences for learning, the scarcity of studies about the prevalence and clinical impact of asthenopia hinders the effective planning of public health measures.


Subject(s)
Asthenopia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Asthenopia/diagnosis , Child , Child, Preschool , Early Diagnosis , Humans , Infant , Observational Studies as Topic , Prevalence , Selection Bias
6.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 21(1): 66-73, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25633930

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite tobacco farming involving intensive manual labor, chronic low back pain (CLBP) prevalence and associated factors are unknown among this occupational group. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in southern Brazil. A random sample of tobacco farmers was interviewed. Socioeconomic and individual characteristics, occupational tasks, workloads, and comorbidities were investigated. Chronic low back pain prevalence was described in relation to independent variables, and associations were examined with Poisson regression. RESULTS: Chronic low back pain prevalence was 8·4%. Increasing age, rearing two or more species of livestock (PR 1·65), exposure to tasks that require heavy physical exertion (PR 2·00), working in awkward postures (PR 1·36), green tobacco sickness (GTS) (PR 1·63), pesticide poisoning (PR 2·37), and minor psychiatric disorders (PR 2·55) were associated with CLBP. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that CLBP is a relevant health problem among tobacco farmers and highlights understudied risk factors such as pesticide poisoning and GTS. Policies to minimize exposure to physiological and chemical workloads in tobacco planting to prevent CLBP are needed. Health professionals should be trained to diagnose and prevent acute low back pain episodes and thus prevent/minimize limitations and disabilities due to CLBP.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Farmers , Female , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Nicotiana , Young Adult
7.
Am J Ind Med ; 57(6): 726-35, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24526387

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite being the second largest tobacco producer in the world, Brazil does not have prevalence studies about green tobacco sickness (GTS). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was carried out on a sample of Brazilian tobacco workers. The sample was described according to socio-demographic, behavioral, and occupational variables. Gender-stratified multivariate analyses examined variables associated with GTS. RESULTS: GTS prevalence among men in the previous month was 6.6%, while among women it was 11.9%. Among men, age, being a non-smoker, hanging tobacco sticks in the barn, harvesting wet leaves, and exposure to physical exertion were risk factors for GTS. Among women, tying hands of tobacco, transporting bales, harvesting wet leaves, having had contact with pesticides, and exposure to physical exertion were positively associated with GTS. CONCLUSION: Research is required to improve methods for GTS screening, as well as the ability to distinguish GTS from pesticide poisoning. Health professionals should be trained to diagnose and treat GTS.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Nicotine/poisoning , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Poisoning/epidemiology , Tobacco Industry , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pesticides , Physical Exertion , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 14: 155, 2013 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23634830

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a highly disabling morbidity with high social, economic and individual effects. Demographic, occupational and behavioral changes that took place in Brazil over the last decade are related with an increasing burden of chronic conditions. Despite these changes, comparison studies on CLBP prevalence and associated factors, over time are scarce in the literature in general, and unknown in Brazil. The present study compared the CLBP prevalence in a medium sized city in Brazil between the years 2002 and 2010 and examined factors associated with prevalence in 2010. METHODS: Two cross-sectional studies with similar methodology were conducted in a medium-sized city in southern Brazil, in 2002 and 2010. 3182 individuals were interviewed in the first study and 2732 in the second one, all adults aged twenty years or more. Those who reported pain for seven weeks or more in the last three months in the lumbar region where considered cases of CLBP. RESULTS: The CLBP prevalence increased from 4.2% to 9.6% in 8 years. In most of the studied subgroups the CLBP prevalence has at least doubled and the increase was even larger among younger individuals with more years of education and higher economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Increase in CLBP prevalence is worrisome because it is a condition responsible for substantial social impact, besides being an important source of demand for health services.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain/epidemiology , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Chronic Pain , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Young Adult
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 10: 146, 2010 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20509960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medicine access is an important goal of medicine policy; however the evaluation of medicine access is a subject under conceptual and methodological development. The aim of this study was to describe quantitative methodologies to measure medicine access on household level, access expressed as paid or unpaid medicine acquisition. METHODS: Searches were carried out in electronic databases and health institutional sites; within references from retrieved papers and by contacting authors. RESULTS: Nine papers were located. The methodologies of the studies presented differences in the recall period, recruitment of subjects and medicine access characterization. CONCLUSIONS: The standardization of medicine access indicators and the definition of appropriate recall periods are required to evaluate different medicines and access dimensions, improving studies comparison. Besides, specific keywords must be established to allow future literature reviews about this topic.


Subject(s)
Drug Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/methods , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans
10.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 7: 131, 2007 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17705873

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The inappropriate use of emergency room (ER) service by patients with non-urgent health problems is a worldwide problem. Inappropriate ER use makes it difficult to guarantee access for real emergency cases, decreases readiness for care, produces negative spillover effects on the quality of emergency services, and raises overall costs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a medium-sized city in southern Brazil. The urgency of the presenting complaint was defined according to the Hospital Urgencies Appropriateness Protocol (HUAP). Multivariable Poisson regression was carried out to examine factors associated with inappropriate ER use. RESULTS: The study interviewed 1,647 patients over a consecutive 13-day sampling period. The prevalence of inappropriate ER use was 24.2% (95% CI 22.1-26.3). Inappropriate ER use was inversely associated with age (P = 0.001), longer stay in the waiting room, longer duration of symptoms and morning shift. However, the determinants of inappropriate ER use differed according age groups (P value for interaction = 0.04). Within the younger age-group (15-49 years), inappropriate ER use was higher among females, patients who reported visiting the ER because there was no other place to go, patients reporting that the doctor at the regular place of care refused to attend to them without a prior appointment, and individuals who reported that the PHC clinic which they use is open for shorter periods during the day. Among older patients (50+ years), those with highest level of education, absence of self-reported chronic diseases and lack of social support were more likely to engage in higher inappropriate ER use. CONCLUSION: Efforts should be made to redirect inappropriate ER demand. Besides expanding access to, and improving the quality of primary and secondary care, it is important to mobilize social support for older patients, to enhance the relationship between different levels of care, as well as to develop campaigns to educate the public about the appropriate use of medical services.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Surveys , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Poisson Distribution , Prevalence , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Utilization Review
11.
Am J Ind Med ; 49(5): 327-36, 2006 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16570252

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ragpickers are informal workers who collect recyclable materials to earn a small wage. Their life and working conditions are extremely precarious. The ergonomic hazards and musculoskeletal pain in a sample of ragpickers in Pelotas, a city in southern Brazil are examined. METHODS: Two comparison groups were available: a matched sample of non-ragpickers from the same poor neighborhoods, and a random sample of the general population of the city. The cross-sectional study gathered data by interview on 990 individuals in 2004. Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using the Standardized Nordic Questionnaire. RESULTS: Ragpickers reported higher prevalences for most awkward postures and ergonomic exposures compared to neighbors with other demanding manual jobs. The prevalence within the last 12 months of low back pain (LBP), lower extremity pain (LEP), and upper extremity pain (UEP) among ragpickers were 49.2%, 45.1%, and 34.9%, respectively; levels similar to those reported by neighborhood controls. Both ragpickers and non-ragpickers reported considerably higher ergonomic exposures, and more prevalent LBP, than the general population. CONCLUSIONS: Ragpickers experience many occupational hazards and ergonomic stressors. Their overall prevalence of musculoskeletal pain was similar to a comparison group with other physically demanding manual jobs. For LBP, this prevalence was substantially higher (49% vs. 35%) than in the general population.


Subject(s)
Educational Status , Ergonomics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Poverty , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
Rev. saúde pública ; 33(4): 391-400, ago. 1999. tab, ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-247964

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Considerando a escassez de estudos rurais de base populacional, buscou-se avaliar as associaçöes entre características do trabalho rural e a ocorrência de morbidade psiquiátrica menor - MPM. Métodos: Utilizando delineamento transversal, estudaram-se 1.282 agricultores de 446 estabelecimentos. As informaçöes foram coletadas por entrevista direta, a partir da percepçäo do trabalhador. O índice de Kappa foi adotado para controle de qualidade. Caracterizaram-se as condiçöes produtivas, dados sociodemográficos e indicadores de saúde mental. Resultados: A prevalência de MPM afetou 37,5 por cento dos agricultores. As prevalências foram maiores entre produtores de feijäo e menores entre os de maçä. Encontrou-se risco aumentado nos estabelecimentos de 26 a 50 ha, e risco reduzido associado à maior mecanizaçäo e aumento de escolaridade. A ocorrência de intoxicaçäo por agrotóxicos mostrou forte associaçäo com MPM, embora näo se possa definir a direçäo dessa associaçäo. Conclusöes: Os resultados alertam para a dimensäo dos problemas e para a urgência de medidas que visem a proteger a saúde dos agricultores


Subject(s)
Pesticides/poisoning , Rural Workers , Mental Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Risk Factors , Educational Status , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/epidemiology , Pesticide Exposure , Rural Population
13.
Rev. saúde pública ; 33(2): 137-46, abr. 1999. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-235844

ABSTRACT

Investiga a associaçäo entre a percepçäo de exposiçäo às cargas de trabalho e o risco de acidentes. O delineamento do estudo foi o tipo de casos e controles. Os casos (n=264) incluíram os acidentes de trabalho típicos notificados no Instituto Nacional de Seguridade Social, de Pelotas, RS (Brasil), de janeiro a julho de 1996. Foram excluídos os óbitos (dois), os acidentes ocorridos na zona rural, e os que afastaram o trabalhador de suas atividades por menos de 7 dias. Para cada caso, foram selecionados 3 tipos de controles: um trabalhor da mesma empresa, um vizinho e um controle populacional. Os controles foram emparelhados com os casos por idade e sexo e prercisavam ter vínculo empregatício formal e näo ter sofrido acidente no último mês. Os dados foram analisados usando regressäo logística condicional. Os trabalhadores que relatavam enfrentar situaçöes de emergência, o trabalho em altura, perigo constante, ou ambientes ruidosos tinham cerca de duas vezes mais risco de acidentar-se. O trabalho em posiçöes incômodas ou com esforço físico intenso aumentaram com 50 por cento o risco de acidentes. As demais cargas de trabalho estudadas näo se constituíram como fatores de risco parra os acidentes. Os resultados foram ajustados para fatores de confusäo


Subject(s)
Occupational Risks , Accidents, Occupational , Case-Control Studies , Risk Factors , Environmental Exposure
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...