[Psychiatric-Psychotherapeutic Care in Crisis: Results of the LeiP#Netz Pilot Project]. / Psychiatrisch-psychotherapeutische Versorgung in der Krise: Ergebnisse des Pilotprojekts LeiP#netz.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of psychiatric-psychotherapeutic crisis services in the Leipzig Psychiatry Network (LeiP#netz), assigning the services to the functional areas of the FBM according to Steinhart and Wienberg. METHODS: A standardized survey of crisis care was conducted using the functions "complex outpatient treatment", "access to acute psychotherapy in crisis", and "24 h complex, intensive treatment" by means of facility-related and function-related instruments. RESULTS: A total of 31 measures were recorded for the three functions. All crisis care services were highly utilized; in up to one-third of cases, no services could be provided when demand was requested. Services that do not require registration or offer 24/7 care are available at very low levels. CONCLUSION: Crisis care services for severely mentally ill people are available in various constellations in the study region. Low-threshold 24/7 crisis services need to be expanded.

[Psychiatric Emergency Admissions and Inpatient Length of Stay Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany]. / Psychiatrische Notfallaufnahmen und stationäre Aufenthaltsdauer vor und während der COVID-19-Pandemie in Deutschland.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of the COVID-19 year on the number of daily psychiatric emergency admissions and length of stay was compared with previous years. METHODS: In a retrospective study, the four quarters of 2020 of several psychiatric hospitals in Germany were statistically compared with the respective quarters of 2018 and 2019. RESULTS: A total of 73,412 cases was analyzed. In the 2nd quarter of 2020, the number of daily admissions was significantly lower as compared to the control period (59.1 vs. 70.7; incidence rate ratio [95 % confidence interval] 0.81 [0.69; 0.96]; p = 0.012). Length of stay was numerically but not significantly different as compared to the control periods. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic had a strong impact on inpatient psychiatric care. In the future, multimodal care structures must ensure the care of severely mentally ill people in crisis situations.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on involuntary and urgent inpatient admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network.

The impact of COVID-19 on urgent and involuntary inpatient admissions, as well as coercive measures, has not been assessed so far. A retrospective study was performed analyzing claims data for inpatient psychiatric admissions between 2018 and 2020 (total n = 64,502) from a large German Hospital network. Whilst the total number of urgent admissions decreased in 2020 (12,383) as compared to 2019 (13,493) and 2018 (13,469), a significant increase in the percentage of urgent admissions was observed in 2020 (62.9%) as compared to 2019 (60.6%) and 2018 (59.7%). Compared to this study period, Odds ratio (OR) for proportion were 0.87 (0.84, 0.91) and 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) for 2018 and 2019, respectively (both p < 0.00001). Percentage of involuntary psychiatric admissions also significantly increased in 2020 and OR compared to this study period ranged from 0.86 (0.81, 0.93) in 2019 (p < 0.0001) to 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) in 2018 (p < 0.001). Proportion of coercive measures significantly increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 (p = 0.004). Taken together, the present study shows an increase in the proportion of involuntary and urgent psychiatric admissions during the whole pandemic year 2020 as compared to 2018 and 2019. The long-term impact of these COVID-19 pandemic-related trends on psychiatric health care needs to be assessed in further studies.

Emergency hospital admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network during the COVID-19 outbreak.

PURPOSE: Psychiatric emergency hospital admissions for distinct psychiatric disorders and length of inpatient stay in the hospital during the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed analyzing claims data from a large German Hospital network during the COVID-19 outbreak (study period: March 13-May 21, 2020) as compared to periods directly before the outbreak (same year control: January 1-March 12, 2020) and one year earlier (previous year control: March 13-May 21, 2019). RESULTS: A total of 13,151 emergency hospital admissions for psychiatric diagnoses were included in the analysis. For all psychiatric diagnoses combined, emergency admissions significantly decreased during the study period with mean (interquartile range) incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of 0.68 (0.65, 0.71) and 0.70 (0.67, 0.73) as compared to the same and previous year controls, respectively (both p < 0.00001). IRR ranged from 0.56 for mood affective disorders (F30-F39) to 0.75 for mental disorders due to psychoactive substance use (F10-F19; all p < 0.00001). Mean (standard deviation) length of hospital stay for all psychiatric diagnoses was significantly shorter during the study period [9.8 (11.6) days] as compared to same [14.7 (18.7) days] and previous [16.4 (23.9) days] year controls (both p < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Both emergency hospital admissions and length of hospital stay significantly decreased for psychiatric disorders during the COVID-19 outbreak. It needs to be assessed in further studies whether healthcare systems will face increased demand for the provision of mental health care in the nearer future.

[COVID-19 Pandemic and Psychiatry - How much have the Interests of People with Psychiatric Disorders been Considered in German Laws?] / COVID-19-Pandemie und Versorgung schwer psychisch erkrankter Menschen ­ Inwieweit wurden die Interessen psychisch erkrankter Menschen in den Schutzverordnungen des Bundes und der Länder berücksichtigt?

OBJECTIVE: Official regulations during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Germany were analyzed concerning their impact on patients with psychiatric disorders. METHODS: All regulations valid between March 1, 2020 and June 30, 2020 with a link to health were included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 344 regulations was identified. Psychiatric health care structures were severely limited with significant heterogeneity concerning extent and duration between the different Federal states. In four Federal states, psychiatric hospitals were exempted from providing capacities towards intensive care. Three Federal states loosened visiting limitations for psychiatric patients. CONCLUSION: During the first lockdown, a broad range of regulations concerning the health care system was adopted often without specifically addressing psychiatric disorders. In the future, the needs of psychiatric patients have to be considered more thoroughly.