Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(8): 3577-3583, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36917252

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate safety and efficacy of mastoid obliteration in canal-wall-down tympanoplasty performed for cholesteatoma using bioactive glass (BAG). The authors routinely adopt CWD tympanoplasty in case of massive cholesteatoma or revision surgery, performing obliteration with BAG to reduce the mastoid cavity and related disadvantages. We assessed anatomical results, infection control and cholesteatoma recurrence in obliterative mastoidectomy using BAG. METHODS: The authors evaluated 66 patients treated with obliterative mastoidectomy using BAG during the period 2010-2021. 48.5% of the cases had first diagnosis of cholesteatoma, 48.5% had cholesteatoma recidivisms, and two patients underwent obliteration to improve clinical outcome. BAG granules were always moistened with venous blood to enhance their adhesion and reduce the risk of dispersion. Anatomical results were evaluated in otomicroscopy and infection control was assessed during follow-up visits. Periodical otomicroscopy was performed to check recurrent cholesteatoma. MRI-DWI was indicated only in case of clinical suspect of cholesteatoma. RESULTS: Authors followed 66 patients during a mean of 23 months. No post-operative wound infections occured. The mean re-epithelialization time was 45 days. At the last visit, control of infection was achieved in 97% of patients and a clinical stable anatomical cavity in all patients. No clinical suspect for recurrent cholesteatoma was found. CONCLUSIONS: The use of bioactive glass is safe and effective as obliteration material in cholesteatoma surgery. Authors pay a particular attention to obliterate only patients without suspect of epithelial residual, to correctly calibrate the ear canal and to completely cover the granules with graft.


Subject(s)
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear , Mastoidectomy , Humans , Mastoidectomy/methods , Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/diagnostic imaging , Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear/surgery , Mastoid/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Tympanoplasty/methods
2.
J Clin Med ; 11(17)2022 Aug 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36078898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-operative infections in head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery represent a major problem and are associated with an important increase in mortality, morbidity, and burden on the healthcare system. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate post-operative infections in HNC surgery and to analyze risk factors, with a specific focus on different sites of infection. METHODS: Clinical data about 488 HNC patients who underwent surgery were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for post-operative infections. RESULTS: Post-operative infections were observed in 22.7% of cases. Respiratory and surgical site infections were the most common. Multiple site infections were observed in 3.9% of cases. Considering all infection sites, advanced stage, tracheotomy, and higher duration of surgery were risk factors at multivariate analysis. Median hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who had post-operative infection (38 vs. 9 days). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative infections may negatively affect surgical outcomes. A correct identification of risk factors may help the physicians to prevent post-operative infections in HNC surgery.

3.
J Clin Med ; 10(19)2021 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34640382

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary or recurrent head and neck cancer of skin or mucosa represents a challenge for clinicians and could be debilitating for the patient. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) emerged as a local ablative procedure for cutaneous and mucosal head and neck tumors. The aim of this observational study was the evaluation of quality of life (QoL) after ECT in patients without other surgical or radiation options as curative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The procedure was performed according the ESOPE (European Standard Operating procedure of Electrochemotherapy) protocol. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated before ECT (T0) and 1 (T1), 3 (T2), and 6 (T3) months after the procedure. QoL was assessed by means of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires. RESULTS: The objective tumor response rate was 48% (11% CR, 37% PR). Bleeding control was achieved in 7/7 patients who experienced bleeding prior to ECT. QoL improvement was observed after the procedure. In particular, global health status and social functioning were higher after ECT (p 0.026 and 0.043), while pain, pain-killers use and appetite loss decreased (p 0.045, 0.025 and 0.002). CONCLUSION: ECT represents a safe and effective treatment for skin and mucosal head and neck tumors without other curative options. It ensures a good pain and bleeding control without worsening of QoL.

4.
Oral Oncol ; 107: 104835, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32505553
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...