The relationship of perceived empathy with levels of pain intensity and incapability among patients visiting a musculoskeletal specialist.

BACKGROUND: People that have more intense symptoms and greater incapability might have less rapport with the clinicians that care for them. OBJECTIVE: This study tested the hypothesis that perceived clinician empathy is related to pain intensity and magnitude of incapability among people seeing a musculoskeletal specialist. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: After a consult with a musculoskeletal specialist, 211 adult patients completed a survey recording demographics, and measures of pain intensity, incapability, and perceived clinician empathy. RESULTS: Higher perceived empathy was associated with being in a committed relationship and, to a modest degree (r = -0.16) lower pain intensity in bivariate and multivariable analyses. DISCUSSION: People experiencing greater pain may be slightly less likely to perceive the clinician as empathetic. PRACTICAL VALUE: Study of the relationship between the patient's experience of care and patient and clinician personal factors can inform efforts to improve patient experience. Advances may depend on experience measures with more normal distributions and less ceiling effect.

Comparing Static Stability of Native Elbow With Static Stability of Novel Bidirectional Ligament Reconstruction at Different Degrees of Elbow Flexion.

Purpose: The treatment of bidirectional ligament instability is proposed using a method that simultaneously tensions medial and lateral ligaments. Graft tension is maintained via plates that apply compression between the graft and bone. Methods: We tested static varus and valgus elbow stability in six cadaver elbows with intact ligaments and capsules at five positions, and then created gross instability by dividing all soft tissue attachments. A ligament reconstruction was subsequently performed with and without nonabsorbable ligament augmentation. Elbow stability was measured and compared with the native state. Results: The augmented and the nonaugmented ligament reconstructions provided stability to the lateral side with only 1.0 mm of increased deflection recorded for the augmented ligaments and 0.6 mm for the nonaugmented when compared with the native state. On the medial side, the deflection was greater after reconstruction compared with the native state with the augmented ligaments ranging between 1.0 and 1.8 mm and the nonaugmented ligament reconstruction ranging between 2.4 and 3.3 mm. Conclusions: This novel ligament reconstruction maintained secure fixation between ligament and bone and allowed for maintenance of static stability at different degrees of elbow flexion. Clinical Relevance: Restoring elbow stability using a method that minimizes ligament graft and which may not need to be removed could benefit management of bidirectionally unstable elbows, such as following interposition arthroplasty or substantial trauma.

Factors Associated With Patient Satisfaction Measured Using an Iterative Scale.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient experience measures tend to have notable ceiling effects that make it difficult to learn from gradations of satisfaction to improve care. This study tested 2 different iterative satisfaction measures after a musculoskeletal specialty care visit in the hope that they might have less ceiling effect. We measured floor effects, ceilings effects, skewness, and kurtosis of both questionnaires. We also assessed patient factors independently associated with the questionnaires and the top 2 possible scores. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 186 patients completed questionnaires while seeing 1 of 11 participating orthopedic surgeons in July and August 2019; the questionnaire measured: (1) demographics, (2) symptoms of depression, (3) catastrophic thinking in response to nociception, (4) heightened illness concerns, and (5) satisfaction with the visit on 2 iterative satisfaction scales. Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought associations of the explanatory variable with the satisfaction scales. RESULTS: There is a small correlation between the 2 scales ( r = 0.27; P < .001). Neither scale had a floor effect and both had a ceiling effect of 45%. There is a very small correlation between greater health anxiety and lower satisfaction measured with one of the scales ( r = -0.16; P = .05). CONCLUSION: An iterative satisfaction questionnaire created some spread in patient experience data, but could not limit ceiling effects. Additional strategies are needed to remove ceiling effects from satisfaction measures.

MRI findings of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis are the norm after age 40.

BACKGROUND: Acromioclavicular joint (AC) arthritis (A) is a common incidental finding on shoulder imaging. An improved knowledge of the age- and sex-specific prevalence (or base rate) of incidental ACA can inform diagnosis and treatment strategies for shoulder pain. HYPOTHESIS: There is no relationship between age or gender and the presence or severity of MRI findings consistent with osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint. METHODS: We rated ACA on 475 MRIs from a database of patients who had MRIs for non-AC indications. The cohort consisted of 51% men, 49% women and had an average age of 55. Bivariate analyses were used for analysis of age and sex-specific prevalence. RESULTS: The prevalence of findings consistent with ACA on MRI for non-AC indications was 83%. The prevalence increased from 75% between ages 40 and 50 to 100% after age 70. Logistic regression demonstrated an association between age and ACA (Odds Ratio 2.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]=2.30 to 3.63; p=0.001). No difference was seen by sex (Chi-Square, 0.16; p=0.67). There was a positive correlation between age and ACA severity (Spearman's rho=0.43; p=0.000010). DISCUSSION: The observation that MRI evidence of ACA is the norm (75%) after age 40 and is universal with human aging (100% after age 70), makes it very difficult to discern ACA as a cause of shoulder symptoms. Given the near universal prevalence of radiological ACA, imaging cannot be used as a reference standard for diagnosis of symptomatic ACA based on symptoms and signs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Surgeon preferences are associated with utilization of telehealth in fracture care.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has the potential to evoke lasting changes in the delivery of care, and the utilization of telehealth. We sought associations between surgeon personal factors and greater use of telehealth to treat fractures relative to in-person care. METHODS: Seventy-five fracture surgeons participated in a survey-based experiment. All surgeons were asked about their preferences regarding remote compared to in-person communication. Participants rated the following items on slider scales: their degree of introversion, the importance of a hands-on/physical exam and surgeon preferences regarding telehealth. We identified factors associated with the use of, and comfort with, telehealth. RESULTS: The use of telehealth during the pandemic was associated with comfort evaluating wounds via telehealth. A greater proportion of remote visits was associated with comfort evaluating wounds and confidence teaching exercises via telehealth. There was consensus that telehealth did not alter utilization rates of radiographs or offer of discretionary surgery. The use of absorbable sutures to limit in-person visits was associated with a preference for working from home and greater comfort with evaluating wounds remotely. The use of 2- and 6-week post-operative telehealth visits and plans to use telehealth after the pandemic (52%) were associated with greater comfort in evaluating wounds through telehealth and greater confidence with video instruction of exercises. CONCLUSIONS: The finding that personal factors are associated with utilization of telehealth helps target strategies for increased use of telehealth and other technologies as the pandemic wanes. Given that telehealth adds convenience for people with ambulatory difficulties or in remote areas, such efforts are warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Not applicable.

Linguistic tones in MRI reports correlate with severity of pathology for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

BACKGROUND: Written communication can convey one's emotions, personality, and sentiments. Radiology reports employ medical jargon and serve to document a patients' condition. Patients might misinterpret this medical jargon in a way that increases their anxiety and makes them feel unwell. We were interested whether linguistic tones in MRI reports vary between radiologists and correlate with the severity of pathology. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there variation in linguistic tones among different radiologists reporting MRI results for rotator cuff tendinopathy? (2) Is the retraction of the supraspinatus tendon in millimeters associated with linguistic tones? METHODS: Two hundred twenty consecutive MRI reports of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff defects were collected. Supraspinatus retraction was measured on the MRI using viewer tools. Using Kruskal-Wallis H tests, we measured variation between 11 radiologists for the following tones: positive emotion, negative emotion, analytical thinking, cause, insight, tentativeness, certainty, and informal speech. We also measured the correlation of tones and the degree of tendon retraction. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models were constructed, seeking factors associated with the tone, accounting for retraction, the presence of prior imaging, and for the effects of each radiologist (nesting). RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences for all of the tones by radiologist. In bivariate analysis, greater retraction of the supraspinatus muscle in millimeters was associated with more negative emotion and certainty, and with less tentativeness. In multilevel mixed-effects linear regression, more negative tones were associated with greater retraction and absence of prior imaging. Greater tentativeness was associated with the absence of prior imaging, but not with retraction. CONCLUSIONS: Radiology reports have emotional content that is relatively negative, varies by radiologist and is affected by pathology. Strategies for more hopeful, positive, optimistic descriptions of pathology have the potential to help patients feel better without introducing inaccuracies even if unlikely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Diagnostic.

Medical Metaphors: Increasing Clarity but at What Cost?

Background: Clinicians often use metaphors to explain complex ideas. Metaphors also have the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking regarding symptoms. We surveyed musculoskeletal specialists regarding use of metaphors in their daily practice and then assessed the contexts in which they are used, the themes of metaphors, and potential for reinforcement of common misconceptions (unhelpful thinking). Two primary research questions were posed: 1- What are the common characteristics of the medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication by musculoskeletal specialists? And, 2- What percentage of medical metaphors used in patient-clinician communication have potential to induce unhelpful thinking and what are the characteristics of those metaphors? Methods: Eighty-one orthopedic and trauma specialists provided examples of metaphors they use in daily practice. Qualitative analysis of responses was performed through open coding of the data with the use of a constant-comparative technique involving several rounds of reading and rereading the data. Results: The 157 metaphors were categorized into 15 different themes. The most common themes were mechanical, objects, and sports and leisure. We also classified metaphors as addressing the natural history of the disease, treatment, mechanism, anatomy, or other. Thirty-five metaphors (22%) were identified as having the potential to reinforce unhelpful thinking. The most common purpose of these metaphors was for explaining the mechanism or natural history of the disease. Conclusion: Metaphors can either reinforce or reorient potentially unhealthy misconceptions. They can also reinforce despair and worry, or they can improve hope and sense of control. Orthopedic surgeons can be strategic and thoughtful in their use of metaphors, planning and practicing specific metaphors for optimal mental, social, and physical health.

Surgeons' Recommendations for Neurodiagnostic Testing With High Pretest Probability of Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel.

PURPOSE: The utility of electrodiagnostic tests (EDx) for patients with a high pretest probability of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (IMNCT) based on characteristic symptoms and signs is debated. Decision-making and care strategies could be informed by a better understanding of factors associated with surgeon recommendations for electrodiagnostic testing. METHODS: Ninety-one upper-extremity surgeons participated in an online, survey-based experiment. Participants viewed 7 vignettes of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, with the following factors randomized in each vignette: patient age, gender, magnitude of incapability, symptom intensity and the presence of nocturnal symptoms, palmar abduction weakness, and positive provocative tests results. We sought patient and surgeon factors associated with ordering EDx and surgeon-rated comfort with performing carpal tunnel release (CTR) without EDx. RESULTS: Surgeons recommended EDx for over half of the patient vignettes, with notable variation (median, 57%; interquartile range, 14-100), and felt relatively neutral, on average, offering CTR without EDx. Twenty-six (29%) out of 91 surgeons ordered EDx for all patient scenarios, and 18 surgeons (20%) did not order testing for any scenario. A lower likelihood of EDx was associated with older age and positive provocative tests results. Greater surgeon comfort offering CTR without EDx was associated with older patients, the presence of nocturnal symptoms, palmar abduction weakness, and positive provocative tests results. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-extremity surgeons are neutral regarding diagnosing IMNCT based on electrodiagnostic evidence of pathology and are relatively more comfortable offering surgery without EDx in older patients that present with key aspects of carpal tunnel syndrome. There is notable variation in care, with half of all surgeons always or never ordering EDx. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Future studies can investigate whether a treatment strategy offering surgery to patients with a high pretest probability of IMNCT and only using EDx in intermediate probability scenarios can limit use of testing without affecting patient health.

Prevalence of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis in people not seeking care: A systematic review.

Objective: Radiographic osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ OA) is a common incidental finding and an uncommon reason for people to seek care for shoulder symptoms. We reviewed the published evidence regarding the age-specific prevalence of ACJ OA to establish the base rate of pathophysiology. Methods: A total of 10 studies including 1831 shoulders met our criteria. A pooled analysis was done to obtain a proportion of subjects with ACJ OA across age categories. Results: Forty-eight percent of 953 cadaver and skeletal specimens and 70% of 210 MRI images of asymptomatic shoulders were found to have changes consistent with ACJ OA. Four studies reporting age as a continuous variable found a statistically significant association between older age and prevalence of ACJ OA. Conclusions: The observation that ACJ OA is highly prevalent as humans age establishes a very high base rate of what one can infer is well-accommodated disease. Given that a high base rate of incidental disease creates a low pre-test odds that radiological findings of disease correspond with symptoms, diagnosis of symptomatic ACJ OA is subject to substantial inaccuracy and should be made sparingly, mindful of the potential harms of a diagnosis that can lead to an ablative surgery.

Quantitative Patient-Reported Experience Measures Derived From Natural Language Processing Have a Normal Distribution and No Ceiling Effect.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patient-reported experience measures have the potential to guide improvement in health care delivery. Many patient-reported experience measures are limited by the presence of strong ceiling effects that limit their analytical utility. METHODS: We used natural language processing to develop 2 new methods of evaluating patient experience using text comments and associated ordinal and categorical ratings of willingness to recommend from 1390 patients receiving specialty or nonspecialty care at our offices. One method used multivariable analysis based on linguistic factors to derive a formula to estimate the ordinal likelihood to recommend. The other method used the meaning extraction method of thematic analysis to identify words associated with categorical ratings of likelihood to recommend with which we created an equation to compute an experience score. We measured normality of the 2 score distributions and ceiling effects. RESULTS: Spearman rank-order correlation analysis identified 36 emotional and linguistic constructs associated with ordinal rating of likelihood to recommend, 9 of which were independently associated in multivariable analysis. The calculation derived from this model corresponded with the original ordinal rating with an accuracy within 0.06 units on a 0 to 10 scale. This score and the score developed from thematic analysis both had a relatively normal distribution and limited or no ceiling effect. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative ratings of patient experience developed using natural language processing of text comments can have relatively normal distributions and no ceiling effect.

Optimizing the implementation of a multisite feasibility trial of a mind-body program in acute orthopedic trauma.

The Toolkit for Optimal Recovery (TOR) is a mind-body program for patients with acute orthopedic injuries who are at risk for persistent pain/disability. In preparation for a multisite feasibility trial of TOR at three orthopedic trauma centers, we aim to qualitatively identify barriers and facilitators to study implementation and strategies to mitigate the implementation barriers and leverage facilitators.We conducted 18 live video focus groups among providers and three one-on-one interviews with department chiefs at Level 1 trauma centers in three geographically diverse sites (N = 79 participants). Using a content analysis approach, we detected the site-specific barriers and facilitators of implementation of TOR clinical trial. We organized the data according to 26 constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), mapped to three Proctor implementation outcomes relevant to the desired study outcomes (acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility). Across the three sites, we mapped six of the CFIR constructs to acceptability, eight to appropriateness, and three to feasibility. Prominent perceived barriers across all three sites were related to providers' lack of knowledge/comfort addressing psychosocial factors, and organizational cultures of prioritizing workflow efficiency over patients' psychosocial needs (acceptability), poor fit between TOR clinical trial and the fast-paced clinic structure as well as basic needs of some patients (appropriateness), and limited resources (feasibility). Suggestions to maximize the implementation of the TOR trial included provision of knowledge/tools to improve providers' confidence, streamlining study recruitment procedures, creating a learning collaborative, tailoring the study protocol based on local needs assessments, exercising flexibility in conducting research, dedicating research staff, and identifying/promoting champions and using novel incentive structures with regular check-ins, while keeping study procedures as nonobtrusive and language as de-stigmatizing as possible. These data could serve as a blueprint for implementation of clinical research and innovations in orthopedic and other medical settings.

General Anxiety Is Associated with Problematic Initial Recovery After Carpal Tunnel Release.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel release can stop the progression of idiopathic median neuropathy at the wrist (carpal tunnel syndrome). Intermittent symptoms tend to resolve after surgery, but loss of sensibility can be permanent. Both pathophysiology (severe neuropathy) and mental health (symptoms of despair or worry) contribute to problematic recovery after carpal tunnel release, but their relative associations are unclear. QUESTION/PURPOSE: Is problematic initial recovery after carpal tunnel release associated with psychologic distress rather than with disease severity? METHODS: We retrospectively studied 156 patients who underwent in-office carpal tunnel release between November 2017 and February 2020, and we recorded their symptoms of anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 [GAD]) and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire), signs of severe median neuropathy (loss of sensibility, thenar muscle atrophy, and palmar abduction weakness), and problematic recovery. The initial recovery (first 2 weeks) was categorized as problematic if the patient was upset about persistent numbness, experienced unsettling postoperative pain, developed hand stiffness, or experienced wound issues-all of which are routinely recorded in the medical record by the treating surgeon along with signs of severe median neuropathy. Twenty-four percent (38 of 156) of patients had a problematic initial recovery characterized by distress regarding persistent numbness (16% [25 of 156]), unsettling pain (8% [12 of 156]), hand stiffness (5% [8 of 156]), or wound issues (1% [2 of 156]); 6% (9 of 156) of patients had more than one issue. Associations between problematic initial recovery and age, gender, symptoms of anxiety and depression, disease severity, specific exam findings, and insurance were evaluated using t-tests, Mann-Whitney tests, and chi-square tests, with the plan to perform logistic regression if at least two variables had an association with p < 0.10. RESULTS: The only factor associated with problematic initial recovery was greater symptoms of anxiety (median GAD score 1.5 [interquartile range 0 to 7.8] for problematic initial recovery compared with a median score of 0 [IQR 0 to 2] for nonproblematic recovery; p = 0.04), so we did not perform a logistic regression. Physical examination findings consistent with severe median neuropathy were not associated with problematic initial recovery. CONCLUSION: The finding that problematic initial recovery after carpal tunnel release was related to symptoms of anxiety and not to the severity of median neuropathy highlights the need to study the ability of efforts to ameliorate anxiety symptoms before carpal tunnel release as an effective intervention to reduce unplanned visits and additional tests, therapy, and repeat surgery, while improving patient-reported outcomes and experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Psychosocial Factors Are Associated With Risk Acceptance in Upper Extremity Patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients who help choose their health strategies are more adherent and achieve better health. An important role of the clinician is to verify that a patient's expressed preferences are consistent with what matters most to the patient and not muddled by common misconceptions about symptoms or conditions. Patient choices are influenced by estimation of the potential benefits and potential harms of a given intervention. One method for quantifying these estimations is the concept of maximum acceptable risk (MAR), or the maximum risk that subjects are willing to accept in exchange for a given therapeutic benefit. This study addressed the hypothesis that misconceptions due to unhelpful cognitive bias regarding pain are associated with risk acceptance among people seeking care for an upper extremity condition. METHODS: We invited 140 new adult patients visiting an upper extremity specialist to complete a survey including demographics, pain intensity, depression and anxiety symptoms, catastrophic thinking, activity limitations, and MAR. Trauma or nontrauma diagnosis was obtained from the treating clinician and recorded by the research assistant. We used bivariate and linear regression analyses to identify factors associated with MAR among this population. RESULTS: Accounting for potential confounding in multivariable analysis, higher MAR was associated with older age and greater catastrophic thinking. CONCLUSIONS: Specialists can be aware that people with more unhelpful cognitive biases may be willing to take more risk. Vigilance for common misconceptions and gentle, incremental reorientation of those misconceptions can increase the probability that people will choose options consistent with what matters most to them.

Patient symptom exaggeration is associated with communication effectiveness and trust.

Objective: Patients might exaggerate their symptoms in an attempt to align the clinician's views with their own. A person who sees potential benefit in symptom exaggeration might also experience less trust, more difficulty communicating, and lower satisfaction with their clinician. We asked if there was an association between patient rating of communication effectiveness, patient satisfaction, and patient trust with symptom exaggeration? Methods: One hundred and thirty-two patients in four orthopaedic offices completed surveys including demographics, Communication-Effectiveness-Questionnaire (CEQ-6), Negative-Pain-Thoughts-Questionnaire (NPTQ-4), a Guttman-style satisfaction question, PROMIS Depression, and Stanford Trust in Physician. Patients were randomly assigned to answer three questions about symptom exaggeration for two scenarios: 1) their own exaggeration during the just-completed visit or 2) the average person's tendency to exaggerate. Results: In multivariable analysis, lower ratings of communication effectiveness were associated with greater symptom exaggeration (p=0.002), while an annual household income>$100,000 (p=0.033) was associated with higher ratings. Higher rating of satisfaction was associated with lower education attained (p=0.004). Greater trust was associated with lower personal exaggeration (p=0.002). Conclusion: The relationship between greater exaggeration and lower ratings of communication effectiveness and trust suggests that symptom descriptions that seem more intense or diffuse than expected may indicate opportunities for more effective communication and trust. Innovation: Patient experience can be improved by training clinicians to identify symptom exaggeration as a signal that the patient does not feel heard and understood and a cue to return to communication strategies that build trust.

Difficult life events affect lower extremity illness.

BACKGROUND: Given the relationship between psychological distress and activity tolerance (capability), a stressful life event might diminish accommodation, increase symptoms, and induce a person to seek specialty care. As a first step to investigate this possibility, this study addressed whether difficult life events are associated with greater activity intolerance and pain intensity. METHODS: A cohort of 127 patients seeking specialty care for lower extremity symptoms completed questionnaires that inquired about difficult life events within the last 12 months as derived from the Holmes Rahe Life Stress Inventory, and recorded pain intensity on an 11-point ordinal scale, activity tolerance [Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (CAT)], symptoms of anxiety (GAD-2; 2 item version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire), symptoms of depression (PROMIS Depression CAT), self-efficacy when in pain (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, 2 question version), and demographics. The treating clinician indicated if the disease was established (e.g. arthritis) or relatively new (e.g. sprain/strain). Bivariate and multivariable analyses sought factors associated with activity intolerance and pain intensity. RESULTS: Greater activity intolerance was associated with difficult life events in bivariate analyses (t = 2.13, MD = 3.18, 95% C.I. = 0.22-6.13, p = 0.04) and in multivariable analyses that excluded symptoms of depression. Greater pain intensity was not associated with difficult life events, but was associated with surgeon rating of established disease (ß = 1.20, 95% C.I. = 0.33-2.08, p < 0.01), greater symptoms of anxiety (MD = 3.35, s = 1.72; ρ = 0.30, p < 0.01), and less education (ß = - 1.06, 95% C.I. = - 1.94- - 0.18, p = 0.02) (no college degree). CONCLUSION: When a musculoskeletal specialist identifies less activity tolerance (less capability) than anticipated for a given injury or pathology, they can anticipate a potential difficult life event, and expect alleviation of symptoms and improved capability as the stress is ameliorated with time and support. Specialists can be prepared to direct people to community or professional support if requested.

Unhelpful Thoughts and Distress Regarding Symptoms Limit Accommodation of Musculoskeletal Pain.

BACKGROUND: Among people with musculoskeletal disorders, much of the variation in magnitude of incapability and pain intensity is accounted for by mental and social health opportunities rather than severity of pathology. Current questionnaires seem to combine distinct aspects of mental health such as unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms, and they can be long and burdensome. To identify personalized health strategies, it would be helpful to measure unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms at the point of care with just a few questions in a way that feels relevant to a person's health. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do questions that address unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms independently account for variation in accommodation of pain? (2) Which questions best measure unhelpful thoughts and distress regarding symptoms? METHODS: This is a cross-sectional questionnaire study of people seeking care regarding upper and lower extremity conditions from one of eight specialist clinicians (one upper extremity, one arthroplasty, and one sports surgeon and their three nurse practitioners and two physician assistants) in one urban office. Between June 2020 and September 2020, 171 new and returning patients were approached and agreed to participate, and 89% (153) of patients completed all questionnaires. The most common reason for noncompletion was the use of a pandemic strategy allowing people to use their phone to finish the questionnaire, with more people leaving before completion. Women and divorced, separated, or widowed people were more likely to not complete the survey, and we specifically account for sex and marital status as potential confounders in our multivariable analysis. Forty-eight percent (73 of 153) of participants were women, with a mean age 48 ± 16 years. Participants completed demographics and the validated questionnaires: Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale, and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (a measure of accommodation to pain). In an exploratory factor analysis, we found that questions group together on four topics: (1) distress about symptoms (unhelpful feelings of worry and despair), (2) unhelpful thoughts about symptoms (such as worst-case thinking and pain indicating harm), (3) being able to plan, and (4) discomfort with uncertainty. We used a multivariable analysis, accounting for potential confounding demographics, to determine whether the identified question groupings account for variation in accommodation of pain-and thus are clinically relevant. Then, we used a confirmatory factor analysis to determine which questions best represent clinically relevant groupings of questions. RESULTS: After accounting for sex, marital status, work, and income, we found that distress and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms were independently associated with accommodation of pain, and together, they explained 60% of its variation (compared with 52% for distress alone and 40% for unhelpful thoughts alone). Variation in symptoms of distress was best measured by the question "I feel I can't stand it anymore" (76%). Variation in unhelpful thoughts was best addressed by the question "I wouldn't have this much pain if there wasn't something potentially dangerous going on in my body" (64%). CONCLUSION: We found that distress (unhelpful feelings) and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms are separate factors with important and comparable associations with accommodation to pain. It also appears that these two factors can be measured with just a few questions. Being attentive to the language people use and the language of influential questions might improve clinician identification of mental health opportunities in the form of distress and unhelpful thoughts about symptoms, which in turn might contribute to better accommodation and alleviation of symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Surgeons Consider Initial Nonoperative Treatment With Potential for Future Conversion to Reverse Arthroplasty a Reasonable Option for Older, Relatively Infirm, and Less-Active Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Two recent developments favor initial nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures among the older, relatively infirm, less-active patients that represent most patients with such fractures: (1) evidence of minimal benefit of open reduction, internal fixation over nonoperative treatment, and (2) evidence of the effectiveness of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. As one step in determining the feasibility of a strategy of initial nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fracture among older, relatively infirm, less-active people, we performed a survey-based experiment to measure factors associated with surgeon recommendation for initial nonoperative treatment. METHODS: Members of the Science of Variation Group viewed 8 hypothetical patients with radiographs of complex proximal humeral fractures and 7 randomized patient variables. For each scenario, surgeons were asked whether they would recommend (1) initial nonoperative treatment with bailout reverse arthroplasty or (2) immediate reverse arthroplasty. RESULTS: The mean percentage of recommendations for initial nonoperative treatment was 63%, with wide variation by surgeon (range 0%-100%). In multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression, recommendation for initial nonoperative treatment was associated with specific radiographs, older age, having a comorbidity, being homebound, surgical subspecialists, and more than 20 years in practice. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that surgeons may consider initial nonoperative treatment with potential for future conversion to reverse arthroplasty an acceptable treatment option, particularly for older, less-active, more infirm individuals, and relatively less displaced fractures with little comminution.

Do Unhelpful Thoughts or Confidence in Problem Solving Have Stronger Associations with Musculoskeletal Illness?

BACKGROUND: Measures of unhelpful thoughts and distress correlate with the intensity of pain and the magnitude of incapability among people seeking musculoskeletal specialty care. In this evolving knowledge area, we want to be sure we have not neglected other important mental health factors. This study addressed how measures of confidence in problem solving as well as past and current ability to achieve goals account for variation in symptoms and capability independent of unhelpful thoughts and distress. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Are measures of confidence in problem solving ability and past and current ability to achieve goals regarding future outcomes associated with variation in capability, independent of measures of symptoms of depression and anxiety (distress) and measures of unhelpful thoughts (worst-case thinking, negative pain thoughts)? (2) Are these measures independently associated with variation in pain intensity? (3) Are these measures associated with measures of symptoms of depression, symptoms of anxiety, and unhelpful thoughts? METHODS: Over a 7-month period during the pandemic, we enrolled sporadically from the offices of four surgeons treating patients who sought care for various upper and lower extremity conditions. We invited approximately 200 adult new and returning patients to participate (the number of invitations was not formally tracked) and 187 accepted. Thirty-one were excluded due to markedly incomplete entries (related to a problematic attempt to use the patient's cell phone to complete questionnaires as a pandemic work around), leaving 156 for analysis. Patients completed an 11-point ordinal rating of pain intensity, two measures of unhelpful thoughts (the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Negative Pain Thoughts Questionnaire), the Adult Hope Scale to measure past and current ability to achieve goals, the Personal Optimism and Self-Efficacy Optimism Scale to measure confidence in problem solving ability, the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive test to measure symptoms of anxiety, the PROMIS computer adaptive test to measure symptoms of depression, and the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test to assess the magnitude of capability. All questionnaires were validated in previous studies. We used bivariate analyses to identify factors associated with magnitude of capability, pain intensity, confidence in problem solving ability, and past and current ability to achieve goals. All factors with a p value of less than 0.1 were included in multivariable analyses to seek associations between these measures accounting for confounders. We reported partial η2 as a measure of effect size for all multivariable regression models. The following rules of thumb are used to interpret values for partial η2: a value of 0.01 = small, 0.06 = medium, and values of 0.14 and higher show large effect size. RESULTS: Greater capability was modestly associated with fewer negative pain thoughts (ß = -0.63 [95% CI -1.0 to -0.22]; standard error = 0.20; partial η2 = 0.06; p = 0.003) and no self-reported comorbidities (ß = 2.6 [95% CI 0.02 to 5.3]; standard error = 1.3; partial η2 = 0.03; p = 0.048) after controlling for education, symptoms of depression and anxiety, worst-case thinking, as well as past and current ability to achieve goals. In a similar multivariable model, greater pain intensity was modestly associated with greater worst-case thinking (ß = 0.33 [95% CI 0.20 to 0.45]; standard error = 0.06; partial η2 = 0.16; p < 0.001) and established patients (ß = -1.1 [95% CI -1.8 to -0.31]; standard error = 0.38; partial η2 = 0.05; p = 0.006). In another similar multivariable model, having more confidence in problem solving ability had a limited association with higher ratings of past and current ability to achieve goals (ß = 0.15 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.21]; standard error = 0.03; partial η2 = 0.13; p < 0.001). In a final multivariable model, lower past and current ability to achieve goals was independently associated with having greater symptoms of depression (ß = -0.45 [95% CI -0.67 to -0.23]; standard error = 0.11; partial η2 = 0.1; p < 0.001) and more negative pain thoughts (ß = -0.49 [95% CI -0.89 to -0.09]; standard error = 0.20; partial η2 = 0.04; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The observation that unhelpful thoughts about symptoms are more strongly associated with symptom intensity than past and current ability to achieve goals and confidence in problem solving ability add to the evidence that attentiveness to unhelpful thinking is an important aspect of musculoskeletal health. Musculoskeletal specialists can prioritize communication strategies such as relationship building and motivational interviewing that develop trust and facilitate reorientation of common unhelpful thoughts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Surgeon Ratings of the Severity of Idiopathic Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel Are Not Influenced by Magnitude of Incapability.

BACKGROUND: Accurately distinguishing the severity of pathophysiology from the level of symptom intensity and incapability is a foundation of effective treatment strategies under the biopsychosocial paradigm of illness. With respect to idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel (the symptoms and signs of which are referred to as carpal tunnel syndrome), surgeons who are more likely to recommend surgery based on the magnitude of symptoms and incapability rather than the severity of neuropathy may be underappreciating and undertreating mental health opportunities and overtreating mild, and on occasion unmeasurable, disease. A survey-based experiment that randomizes elements of the patient presentation can help determine the relative influence of magnitude of incapability on ratings of pathology severity. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What factors are associated with severity rating of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel on an 11-point ordinal scale? METHODS: One hundred eight hand and wrist members of the Science of Variation Group (among approximately 200 participants who complete at least one survey-experiment a year related to the upper extremity on average) reviewed seven scenarios of fictional median neuropathy with seven randomized variables: age, gender, limitations of daily activity (incapability), Tinel and Phalen test results, duration of numbness episodes, prevention of numbness with nocturnal splint immobilization, constant numbness, and weakness of palmar abduction. Participants had a mean age of 51 ± 10 years, 90% (97 of 108) were men, and 74% (80 of 108) were subspecialized in hand surgery. Surgeons were asked to rate the severity of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel on a on an 11-point ordinal scale. Factors associated with rated severity were sought in multilevel ordered logistic regression models. Fifteen surgeons did not complete all of their assigned randomized scenarios, resulting in a total of 675 ratings. RESULTS: After controlling for potentially confounding variables such as magnitude of incapability, factors associated with severity rating on the 11-point ordinal scale included palmar abduction weakness (odds ratio 11 [95% confidence interval 7.7 to 15]), longer duration of symptom episodes (OR 4.5 [95% CI 3.3 to 6.2]), nocturnal numbness in spite of splint immobilization (OR 3.2 [95% CI 2.3 to 4.3]), constant numbness (OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.9 to 3.4]), positive Tinel and positive Phalen test results (OR 2.2 [95% CI 1.6 to 2.9]), and older age (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.1]). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that surgeons rate the severity of idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel based on evidence of worse pathophysiology and are not distracted by greater incapability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons who consider greater incapability as an indication of more severe pathology seem to be practicing outside the norm and may be underappreciating and undertreating the unhelpful thoughts and feelings of worry or despair that consistently account for a notable amount of the variation in symptom intensity and magnitude of incapability.