Symptoms and risk factors for long COVID in Tunisian population.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented various challenges, one of which is the discovery that after the acute episode, around 30% of patients experience persistent symptoms or develop new ones, now known as long COVID. This new disease has significant social and financial impacts. The objective is to determine the prevalence of long COVID in the Tunisian population and identify its predictive factors. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among Tunisians who were infected with COVID-19 between March 2020 and February 2022. An online self-administered questionnaire was distributed through social media, radio, and television channels over the course of one month (February 2022). Long COVID was defined as the persistence of existing symptoms or the development of new symptoms within three months after onset, lasting for at least two months, and with no differential diagnosis. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses using binary stepwise logistic regression with a significance level set at 5%. RESULTS: A total of 1911 patients participated in our study, and the prevalence of long COVID was 46.5%. The two most frequent categories were general and neurological post-COVID syndrome, with a prevalence of 36.7% each. The most commonly observed symptoms were fatigue (63.7%) and memory problems (49.1%). In the multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for long COVID were female gender and age of 60 years or older, while complete anti-COVID vaccination was found to be a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that complete vaccination was a protective factor against long COVID, while female gender and age of 60 years or older were identified as the main risk factors. These findings are consistent with studies conducted on other ethnic groups. However, many aspects of long COVID remain unclear, including its underlying mechanisms, the identification of which could guide the development of potential effective treatments.

Resource utilization and preparedness within the COVID-19 pandemic in Tunisian medical intensive care units: A nationwide retrospective multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: The worldwide SARS-CoV-2 pandemic represents the most recent global healthcare crisis. While all healthcare systems suffered facing the immense burden of critically-ill COVID-19 patients, the levels of preparedness and adaptability differed highly between countries. AIM: to describe resource mobilization throughout the COVID-19 waves in Tunisian University Medical Intensive Care Units (MICUs) and to identify discrepancies in preparedness between the provided and required resource. METHODS: This is a longitudinal retrospective multicentre observational study conducted between March 2020 and May 2022 analyzing data from eight University MICUs. Data were collected at baseline and at each bed expansion period in relation to the nation's four COVID-19 waves. Data collected included epidemiological, organizational and management trends and outcomes of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 admissions. RESULTS: MICU-beds increased from 66 to a maximum of 117 beds. This was possible thanks to equipping pre-existing non-functional MICU beds (n = 20) and creating surge ICU-beds in medical wards (n = 24). MICU nurses increased from 53 to 200 of which 99 non-ICU nurses, by deployment from other departments and temporary recruitment. The nurse-to-MICU-bed ratio increased from 1:1 to around 1·8:1. Only 55% of beds were single rooms, 80% were equipped with ICU ventilators. These MICUs managed to admit a total of 3368 critically-ill patients (15% of hospital admissions). 33·2% of COVID-19-related intra-hospital deaths occurred within the MICUs. CONCLUSION: Despite a substantial increase in resource mobilization during the COVID-19 pandemic, the current study identified significant persisting discrepancies between supplied and required resource, at least partially explaining the poor overall prognosis of critically-ill COVID-19 patients.

Prognostic Value of Routine Blood Parameters in Intensive Care Unit COVID-19 Patients.

Introduction: Laboratory medicine has an important role in the management of COVID-19. The aim of this study was to analyze routinely available blood parameters in intensive care unit COVID-19 patients and to evaluate their prognostic value. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective, observational, single-center study including consecutive severe COVID-19 patients who were admitted into the intensive care unit of Ben Arous Regional Hospital in Tunisia from 28 September 2020 to 31 May 2021. The end point of the study was either hospital discharge or in-hospital death. We defined two groups based on the outcome: survivors (Group 1) and non-survivors (Group 2). Demographical, clinical, and laboratory data on admission were collected and compared between the two groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine the predictive factors for COVID-19 disease mortality. Results: A total of 150 patients were enrolled. Eighty patients (53.3%) died and 70 (46.7%) survived during the study period. Based on statistical analysis, median age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) with the serum levels of urea, creatinine, total lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase, procalcitonin and hs-troponin I were significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors. On multivariate analysis, LDH activity ≥ 484 U/L (OR=17.979; 95%CI [1.119-2.040]; p = 0.09) and hs-troponin I ≥ 6.55 ng/L (OR=12.492; 95%CI [1.691-92.268]; p = 0.013) independently predicted COVID-19 related mortality. Conclusion: Total LDH and hs-troponin I were independent predictors of death. However, further clinical investigations with even larger number of patients are needed for the evaluation of other laboratory biomarkers which could aid in assessing the prediction of mortality.

Can We Satisfy Family in Intensive Care Unit? A Tunisian Experience.

Background: Communication improvement and family satisfaction in intensive care unit (ICU) are the main indicators of care quality. Our study aims were to evaluate family satisfaction in our intensive care and identify factors influencing the satisfaction level. Materials and methods: We performed a descriptive prospective study in the ICU of Ben Arous régional hospital conducted between October 2016 and June 2018. We included parents of patients hospitalized for more than 48 hours, with available contact details and they agreed to reply to the questionnaire. Results: One hundred and twelve family representatives were included. Ten (9%) were illiterate and 40 (36%) had a primary level education. Noninvasive ventilation and hemodialysis were, respectively, used in 53 and 9.8% of cases. Thirteen patients had sequelae at their hospital discharge. The median satisfaction score was 133.5 (120; 145.7). Ninety-five (85%) relatives were always satisfied with cleanliness of the unit. The medical and paramedical staff availability was appreciated as excellent, respectively, by 65 (56%) and 66 (59%) family members. The information provided by doctors and paramedical staff was considered very clear by 75 (65%) and 65 (58%) parents, respectively. The medical secret was respected by medical (n = 107) and paramedical (n = 105) staffs in most cases. Patient management was considered excellent by 90 (80%) parents. The level of satisfaction was lower when the parent interviewed was illiterate (p = 0.04) or had a primary-level education (p = 0.012), with hemodialysis resort (p = 0.011) and with the presence of sequelae at hospital discharge (p = 0.017). Conclusion: Family members were satisfied with the unit environment, the communication, the healthcare management, and the patient care. Low education level, hemodialysis use, and sequelae at hospital discharge influence negatively the satisfaction. How to cite this article: Fathallah I, Drira H, Habacha S, Kouraichi N. Can We Satisfy Family in Intensive Care Unit? A Tunisian Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(2):185-191.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of 2D-Strain in Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: Strain has shown a promising diagnostic and prognostic value in acute coronary syndromes. With, however, less data in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSEMI). AIM: to evaluate in NSTEMI patients, the ability of strain to predict the severity of the disease, by assessing correlations to established prognostic parameters, and to predict culprit and occluded coronary arteries (CA). Secondary, to determine factors associated to strain changes during follow-up. METHODS: The study was prospective, NSTEMI patients with significant coronary lesion and without significant non-ischaemic disease were included. Angiographic and echocardiographic investigation including global (GLS) and territorial (TLS) longitudinal strain were performed within 24h from admission. Syntax I score was calculated. Severe coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined by left main of three-vessel disease. RESULTS: Seventy NSTEMI patients aged 60.2±10.1 years were enrolled; 61% were smokers, 54% diabetics and 46% hypertensive. 34% had a severe CAD, 7% had an acute coronary occlusion (ACO) and 14% a chronic coronary total occlusion (CTO). GLS >-15.3% predicted a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% with 80% Sensitivity (Se) and 78% Specificity (Sp). GLS was associated to CAD complexity and severity. GLS > -14.1% detected severe CAD with 83% Se and 80%Sp. TLS determined the culprit artery in 74% of cases and TLS > -9.2% predicted ACO with 85% Se and 85% Sp. TLS was also associated to CTO. At a 10 months median follow-up [3-12months], GLS significantly improved, baseline LVEF, GLS, wall motion score index and revascularization were the predictors of this improvement. CONCLUSION: In NSTEMI patients, GLS detected severe CAD and poor myocardial function. TLS predicted the culprit vessel and its occlusion. GLS improvement at midterm was predicted by baseline systolic LV function parameters and myocardial revascularization.

Toxin-induced cardiac arrest: frequency, causative agents, management and hospital outcome.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest (CA) is a public health problem, with various etiologies and a fatal issue in 90-95% of cases. Toxin-induced cardiac arrests (TICA) are poorly described. Scarcity of national data prompted us to carry-out this study. AIM: To determine TICA frequency in a Tunisian reference center in toxicology and its hospital prognosis, and to describe its clinical and therapeutic aspects Methods : Data were collected retrospectively over an 8-years period. We included patients admitted for post-CA care with highly suspected or confirmed TICA. Clinical and toxicological data were recorded. RESULTS: We recorded 21 cases of TICA, which represented 48.8% of CA. A single toxic agent was incriminated in 90% of cases. Main causative agents identified in our series were pesticides and betablockers: chloralosed (n = 6), carbamate inhibitor of cholinesterase (n = 5), acebutolol (n = 4) and organophosphate (n = 2). One case of opiates and cocaine poisoning was reported. Median duration of "no flow" was 0 minutes. Mean duration of "low flow" was 13.74±9.15 minutes. An initial shockable rhythm was noted only in three patients. Mortality rate was 76% (16/21). Four of the five survivors had a Cerebral Performance Category Scale (CPC) 1, only one patient survived with a CPC 3. Factors associated with mortality were : the duration of "low flow" (p=0.02) and APACHE II score (p=0.014). APACHE II≥29 was the only independent factor (OR=2.0, 95%CI [1.07;3.71]). CONCLUSION: TICA were most frequently provoked by pesticides, mortality was high and was independently predicted by APACHE II score.