ABSTRACT
The bile duct division is a crucial step in the donor hepatectomy. Multiple small ducts will make the biliary reconstruction more difficult and may influence the outcome of the recipient. Biliary leakage, bilomas and biliary strictures are well recognized donor complications that may be directly linked to bile duct division. Biliary division still needs more standardization. This work aims to analyze our experience with two different methods of bile duct division in relation to the development of intraoperative and postoperative biliary complications. Between April 2004 and March 2013, 216 liver donors underwent right hepatectomy, in Gastro-Enterology Surgical Center, Mansoura University, Egypt. According to the method of bile duct division, the study population was divided into 2 groups; 1- extrahepatic dissection group (EDG) and 2- fluoroscopy guided transection group (FGG), each comprised 108 patients. Data were collected from a prospectively registered database, with special emphasis on the occurrence of biliary complications. Complications were classified according to the latest version of Clavien classification. Intraoperative biliary complications did not differ between both groups, p = 0.313. The commonest postoperative complication was biliary leak/biloma accounting for 32.5% of all donor complications, followed by non-biliary fluid collections. 24 (11.1%) donors developed 27 biliary complications. The FGG showed significantly less biliary complications (5.6%, 6 donors), when compared to EDG (15.7%, 18 donors), p = 0.015. Grade 3 complications were significantly higher in EDG, p = 0.024. On multivariate analysis, the only significant factor predicting the occurrence of biliary complications was the use of fluoroscopy guided bile duct division, p = 0.009. In conclusion, we believe that the proposed method of biliary division is safe, simple and reproducible.
Subject(s)
Bile Duct Diseases/etiology , Bile Ducts/surgery , Hepatectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cholangiography , Female , Humans , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: HCC is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The main etiological factor in Egypt is HCV infection. Lack of cadaveric transplantation in Egypt makes LDLT the only available option for liver transplantation for HCC patients with advanced cirrhosis and/or non-resectable tumors. METHODOLOGY: Between January 2004 and April 2012, 170 patients underwent LDLT at the Liver Transplantation Unit, Mansoura University, and 52 (30.6%) were shown to have HCC by pathological examination. Patient demographics, preoperative interventions and pathological findings were evaluated for their influence on recurrence and survival. Patients were followed-up with abdominal sonography and AFP every 3 months and CT scans every 6 months. Median follow-up was 22.9 months. RESULTS: The main cause of underlying cirrhosis was HCV (96.2%). One or more different pre-transplant treatments of HCC were performed in 14 (27.4%) patients. The median total size was 4cm (0.8-15.5). Microvascular invasion was detected in 16 (31.4%) patients; 16 patients proved to have tumors beyond the Milan criteria. Pre-transplantation AFP more than 200ng/mL, total tumor size more than 8cm and microvascular invasion influenced recurrence rate on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis identified AFP (p = 0.016) as independent factor for recurrence. Survival was significantly affected by AFP (p = 0.003) and microvascular invasion (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: LDLT is a feasible option for patients with HCC on top of cirrhosis with good survival and recurrence-free survival rates.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/surgery , Liver Neoplasms/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Disease-Free Survival , Egypt , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Patient Selection , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , alpha-Fetoproteins/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate living liver donor outcome after right hepatectomy in a single Egyptian center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and July 2010, 100 living donors underwent right hepatectomy. Their medical records and postoperative follow-up visits were retrospectively revised. Perioperative complications were reported. Postoperative complications were classified according to the five tier version of Clavien system. RESULTS: There were 71 males and 29 females. The mean age was 27.6 ± 7.4 years. The mean graft weight was 999 ± 167 g and the mean volume percent of the remaining liver was 36.8 ± 8%. The mean ICU and hospital stay were 2.6 ± 2.7 and 12.4 ± 9.1, respectively. A total of 57 complications developed in 38 donors (38%). The commonest complication type was biliary complications. There were 22 grade I, 6 grade II, 15 grade IIIa, 12 grade IIIb, 1 grade IVa, and 1 grade V complications. One donor died due to posttransfusion ARDS on the 30th postoperative day. On follow-up, no donor developed long lasting disability. A donor died in a road traffic accident 1 year after donation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Donor right hepatectomy is not an entirely safe procedure. Biliary complications are the commonest early postoperative complications.
