Bedside ultrasound to assess acute central venous pressure change during treatment of decompensated heart failure.

Background: Accurate volume status assessment is crucial for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Volume status assessment by physical exam is often inaccurate, necessitating invasive measurement with right heart catheterization (RHC), which carries safety, pragmatic (scheduling, holding anticoagulants, etc.), and financial burdens. Therefore, a reliable, non-invasive, cost-effective alternative is desired. Previously, we developed an ultrasound (US) based technique to measure internal jugular vein (IJV) compliance during RHC which was used for single time point central venous pressure (CVP) predictions. We now aim to apply this technique to track acute changes in CVP during diuresis for ADHF in patients with an in-dwelling pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). Methods: We used an observational, prospective study design and recruited 15 patients from the cardiac critical unit (CCU) being treated for ADHF (systolic or diastolic) with intravenous (IV) diuretics with/without inotropic agents who underwent Swan- Ganz catheter/PAC insertion for continuous CVP monitoring. 13 of 15 patients received milrinone infusions. US images of the IJV were obtained at end-expiration and during the strain phase of Valsalva at multiple 2-3 hours intervals. Change in IJV cross-sectional area (CSA) (ImageJ) was used as a measure of IJV compliance. Patients unable to perform the Valsalva maneuver were excluded. Results: Calculated percentage change (%Δ) in CSA of IJV was plotted against CVP. An inverse relationship was observed between CVP and %Δ in CSA of IJV. The data was fit with a polynomial regression curve (R2 = 0.36, root mean square error = 3.19). Fivefold cross-validation showed a stable model for predicting CVP based on CSA (R2 = 0.31, root mean square error = 3.18). Conclusion: Serial portable US assessment of IJV compliance can act as a surrogate measure of CVP and, therefore, can provide reliable information on acute hemodynamic changes in ADHF.

Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and postpartum period.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality. Rates of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period have not decreased over the past two decades and pregnancyassociated VTE continues to pose a significant health challenge. Pregnant and postpartum women are at a higher risk for VTE owing to many factors. There are hormonally mediated and pregnancy-specific alterations of coagulation that favor thrombosis, including increased production of clotting factors. There are physiologic and anatomic mechanisms that also contribute, including a decreased rate of venous blood flow from the lower extemities as pregnancy progresses. Cesarean delivery also introduces VTE risk. In addition, studies have demonstrated that pregnancy-associated complications such as pre-eclampsia or peri-partum infections are associated with increased VTE rates. In this review, we discuss the recent epidemiological studies, pathogenesis, risk factors and clinical presentation as well as therapeutic options for VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period. We also provide proposed diagnostic algorithms for diagnosis and management of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum period based on updated evidence. Finally, we highlight knowledge gaps to guide future research.

Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: Another area of sex disparity?

Cardiogenic shock in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) carries significant morbidity and mortality, despite advances in pharmacological, mechanical and reperfusion therapies. Studies suggest that there is evidence of sex disparities in the risk profile, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating AMI. Compared with men, women tend to have more comorbidities, greater variability in symptom presentation and are less likely to receive timely revascularization and mechanical circulatory support. These factors might explain why women tend to have worse outcomes. In this review, we highlight sex-based differences in the prevalence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock due to AMI, and discuss potential ways to mitigate them.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy with LVOT obstruction in a case of STEMI: a rare cause of peri-PCI hypotension.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) associated with left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in the event of an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a rare cause of hypotension during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Herein, we describe a 57-year-old woman who presented with STEMI and underwent PCI. She developed hypotension which worsened during inotropic therapy. Echocardiography revealed evidence of LVOT obstruction in the setting of TCM. Therefore, inotropic support was promptly discontinued. Beta blockers and phenylephrine were rapidly administrated, resulting in improved blood pressure and stabilisation of the patient.

Documentation of shared decision making around primary prevention defibrillator implantations.

INTRODUCTION: Patients eligible for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy are faced with a complex decision that needs a clear understanding of the risks and benefits of such an intervention. In this study, our goal was to explore the documentation of primary prevention ICD discussions in the electronic medical records (EMRs) of eligible patients. METHODS: In 1523 patients who met criteria for primary prevention ICD therapy between 2013 and 2015, we reviewed patient charts for ICD-related documentation: "mention" by physicians or "discussion" with patient/family. The attitude of the physician and the patient/family toward ICD therapy during discussions was categorized into negative, neutral, or positive preference. Patients were followed to the end-point of ICD implantation. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 442 days, 486 patients (32%) received an ICD. ICD was mentioned in the charts of 1105 (73%) patients, and a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD was documented in 706 (46%) charts. On multivariable analyses, positive cardiologist (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.9, 95% confidence of intervals [CI]: 1.0-59.7, P < .05), electrophysiologist (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 1.9-31.7, P < .001), and patient/family (HR: 9.9, 95% CI: 6.2-15.7, P < .001) preferences toward ICD therapy during the first documented ICD discussion were independently associated with ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients eligible for primary prevention ICD therapy, a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD implantation was documented in less than 50% of the charts. More consistent documentation of the shared decision making around ICD therapy is needed.