Data quality of bedside monitoring in an intensive care unit.

Computerized record keeping promises complete, accurate and legible documentation. Reliable measurements are a prerequisite to fulfill these expectations. We analyzed the physiological variables provided by bedside monitoring devices in 657 bedside visits performed by an experienced Intensive Care nurse during 75 Intensive Care rounds. We registered which variables were displayed. If a variable was displayed, we assessed whether it could be used for documentation or should be rejected. If a value was rejected the reason was registered as: the measurement was not intended (superfluous display), the current clinical situation did not allow proper measurement, or other reasons. Basic variables (vital signs and respiration related variables) were displayed in more then 90%, specific variables (e.g. intracranial pressure) were displayed in less than 50% of the situations. Displayed variables were superfluous on an average of 11% because measurement was not intended. Variables like heart rate, temperature, airway pressure, minute volume of ventilation, arrhythmia, pulmonary arterial pressure, non-invasive blood pressure, and intracranial pressure provide high quality measured values (acceptance of more than 90%). Invasive arterial pressure, central venous pressure, respiration rate and oxygen saturation (via pulse oximetry) provided lower quality values with a rejection rate higher than 10%. Inappropriate sensor technology to match the clinical environment seems to be the root cause. In future the request for automatic documentation will increase. In order to avoid additional staff workload and to ensure reliable documentation, sensor technology especially related to respiration rate, blood pressure measurements, and pulse oximetry should be improved.

Lessons learned while building an integrated ICU workstation.

The project LUCY (Linked Ulm Care sYstem) is described. The goal of this project was to build a research workstation in an Intensive Care Unit which enables evaluation of data/information processing and presentation concepts. Also evaluation of new devices and functions considering not only one device but the workplace as an entirety was an aim of the project. We describe the complete process of building from the stage of design until its testing in clinical routine. LUCY includes a patient monitor, a ventilator, 4 infusion pumps and 8 syringe pumps. All devices are connected to a preprocessing computer via serial interfaces. A high performance graphic workstation is used for central display of physiological and therapeutic variables. A versatile user interface provides touch screen, keyboard and mouse interaction. For fluid administration a bar code based control and documentation facility was included. While our scheduled development efforts were below 4 man-years, the overall man-power needed until the first routine test amounts to 8 man-years. Costs of devices and software sum up to 160,000 US$. First experiences in clinical routine show good general acceptance of the workplace concept. Analysing the recorded data we found 90% of the items to be redundant: individual filtering algorithms are necessary for each of nowaday's devices. The flexibility of the system concerning the implementation of new features is far from our expectations. Technical maintenance of the system during clinical operation requires continuous effort which we cannot afford in the current situation.