Depression and performance on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.

There is strong evidence that depression is associated with neuropsychological deficits across multiple domains. However, research on this topic has spanned a variety of measures with different psychometric properties and normative samples, which prevents drawing definitive conclusions about the pattern of neuropsychological deficiencies. The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) is a brief neurocognitive battery that is routinely used in clinical settings and provides co-normed measures of attention, language, memory, and visuospatial/constructional skills. The present study examined the association between depression and RBANS performance in a sample of 66 18-65 year-old adults who completed a neuropsychological evaluation at an outpatient clinic. Results indicated that depressed participants, relative to controls, demonstrated poorer performance in immediate and delayed memory, attention, and visuospatial/constructional abilities, and the four domains were diminished to a similar degree. These results were replicated using a continuous measure of depression symptoms. In addition, the association between depression and delayed memory was at least partially due to current psychotropic medication. The present study suggests that the RBANS is sensitive to the neuropsychological deficits typically found in depression, such that mild to moderate depression in adult outpatients is associated with comparable deficits in attention, memory, and visuospatial/constructional abilities.

Refining Measures for Assessing Problematic/Addictive Digital Gaming Use in Clinical and Research Settings.

Problematic or addictive digital gaming (including all types of electronic devices) can and has had extremely adverse impacts on the lives of many individuals across the world. The understanding of this phenomenon, and the effectiveness of treatment design and monitoring, can be improved considerably by continuing refinement of assessment tools. The present article briefly overviews tools designed to measure problematic or addictive use of digital gaming, the vast majority of which are founded on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for other addictive disorders, such as pathological gambling. Although adapting DSM content and strategies for measuring problematic digital gaming has proven valuable, there are some potential issues with this approach. We discuss the strengths and limitations of current methods for measuring problematic or addictive gaming and provide various recommendations that might help in enhancing or supplementing existing tools, or in developing new and even more effective tools.