In vitro comparison of the surface roughness of polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic resins for interim restorations before and after polishing.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Polymethyl methacrylate and bis-acrylic based resins are widely used for interim restorations. Their initial surface roughness is important because it determines their aesthetic properties and the potential for biofilm adhesion. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the surface roughness and morphology of 6 bis-acrylic and 2 polymethyl methacrylate resins widely used for interim dental restorations, both before and after polishing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Specimens made of different bis-acrylic resins (Protemp 4, Luxatemp Star, Systemp, Telio, Structur Premium, Structur 3) or of polymethyl methacrylate (Unifast Trad, Unifast 3) were polished using a 2-step polishing system (Diatech). The average surface roughness before and after polishing (10 seconds at low speed in dry conditions) was measured by optical profilometry. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy were used to analyze surface morphology. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to evaluate the differences in roughness among specimens (α=.05), and the Pearson r correlation was computed to assess the relationship between fillers and average surface roughness. RESULTS: In the 8 groups evaluated, the roughness significantly increased (P<.001) for Protemp 4 (from 0.12 to 0.50 µm), Luxatemp Star (0.17 to 1.19 µm), Unifast 3 (0.40 to 1.00 µm), Systemp (0.46 to 1.51 µm), Structur 3 (0.85 to 1.06 µm), Structur Premium (1.00 to 1.74 µm), and Telio (1.13 to 1.21 µm), except for Unifast Trad (9.20 to 2.59 µm). Pairwise multiple comparisons identified Protemp 4 as having the smoothest surface before and after polishing, while Unifast Trad was the roughest in both. Atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy observations showed that the surface roughness of bis-acrylic resins was related to their surface morphology and average filler sizes. A positive relation between fillers and roughness was assessed (r=0.345, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: For the bis-acrylic interim resins, the surface roughness after polishing was correlated to the material used and its filler sizes. Nanofiller-based resins showed the smoothest surfaces. For the polymethyl methacrylate-based resins, the recently marketed Unifast 3 had the lowest overall roughness values.

Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System.

Aim. To evaluate the pain experience and behavior during dental injection, using the Wand computerized delivery system versus conventional local anesthesia in children and adolescents. Methods. An observational crossover split mouth study was performed on 67 patients (aged 7 to 15 years), requiring local anesthesia for dental treatments in both sides of the dental arch. Patients received both types of injections in two separate appointments, one with the use of a Computer Delivery System (the Wand STA system) and one with the traditional syringe. The following data were recorded: pain rating; changes in heart rate; level of collaboration; patient satisfaction. The data were analyzed using ANOVA for quantitative outcomes and nonparametric analysis (Kruskal-Wallis) for qualitative parameters. Results. The use of the Wand system determined significantly lower pain ratings and lower increase of heart rate than the traditional syringe. During injection, the number of patients showing a relaxed behavior was higher with the Wand than with the traditional local anesthesia. The patient level of satisfaction was higher with the Wand compared to the conventional local anesthesia. Conclusions. The Wand system may provide a less painful injection when compared to the conventional local anesthesia and it seemed to be better tolerated with respect to a traditional syringe.

Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the microgap between different zirconia abutments and their titanium implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four systems were evaluated: Procera zirconia (Nobel Biocare) (Nb), Cercon Balance Anterior (Dentsply Friadent) (Ba), ZirDesign (Astratech) (Zd), and Straumann Cares ceramic (Straumann) (Ca). Five assemblies were assessed for each system. The assemblies were embedded in epoxy, cut along their long axes, and polished. Scanning electron microscopic observations were made along the first 100 microm of the gap on each side at maximal magnification. Images were combined and gap measurements were made 10 microm apart. A two-way analysis of variance was performed on the data. RESULTS: Scanning electron micrographs showed a mean marginal microgap of 0.89 microm (SD 1.67) for all assemblies. Significant differences (P < .001) were observed between mean (+/- SD) microgap measurements of the four tested systems: Ba = 0.38 +/- 0.28 microm; Zd = 0.55 +/- 0.23 microm; Nb = 1.83 +/- 3.21 microm; Ca = 0.90 +/- 0.59 microm. The mean microgap of the first 20 microm of the outer region (1.66 microm) was significantly (P < .001) larger than the mean microgap (0.56 microm) of the inner region (30 to 100 microm). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the mean microgap observed for all tested systems was less than 2 microm. For each system, the microgap decreased quickly from the outer region to the inner. The mean gap was larger for flat-to-flat connection systems, compared to internal-connection systems with a conical interface. These results demonstrate smaller microgaps compared to those described in the literature for titanium abutments. The precise fit of these abutments could lead to better biologic and biomechanical behavior.