Clinical evaluation of eye movements in spinocerebellar ataxias: a prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Ocular motor abnormalities reflect the varied neuropathology of spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) and may serve to clinically distinguish the different SCAs. We analyzed the various eye movement abnormalities detected prospectively at the baseline visit during a large multicenter natural history study of SCAs 1, 2, 3, and 6. METHODS: The data were prospectively collected from 12 centers in the United States in patients with SCAs 1, 2, 3, and 6, as part of the Clinical Research Consortium for Spinocerebellar Ataxias (NIH-CRC-SCA). Patient characteristics, ataxia rating scales, the Unified Huntington Disease Rating Scale functional examination, and clinical staging were used. Eye movement abnormalities including nystagmus, disorders of saccades and pursuit, and ophthalmoparesis were recorded, and factors influencing their occurrence were examined. RESULTS: A total of 301 patients participated in this study, including 52 patients with SCA 1, 64 with SCA 2, 117 with SCA 3, and 68 with SCA 6. Although no specific ocular motor abnormality was pathognomonic to any SCA, significant differences were noted in their occurrence among different disorders. SCA 6 was characterized by frequent occurrence of nystagmus and abnormal pursuit and rarity of slow saccades and ophthalmoparesis and SCA 2 by the frequent occurrence of slow saccades and infrequent nystagmus and dysmetric saccades. SCA 1 and SCA 3 subjects had a more even distribution of eye movement abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Prospective data from a large cohort of patients with SCAs 1, 2, 3, and 6 provide statistical validation that the SCAs exhibit distinct eye movement abnormalities that are useful in identifying the genotypes. Many of the abnormalities correlate with greater disease severity measures.

Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor demonstrates long-term ipsilateral effects.

INTRODUCTION: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of thalamus in essential tremor (ET) is effective for the treatment of contralateral tremors. Bilateral DBS controls tremors on both sides but is associated with increased morbidity and risks. We evaluated if unilateral surgery had ipsilateral benefits on tremors and thus could be a potentially safer alternative to bilateral DBS. METHODS: Medication refractory ET patients undergoing unilateral thalamic DBS were included and longitudinally followed. Tremor rating scale was used to record total motor, arm tremor and activities of daily living (ADL) scores at baseline, six months and at last visit (three or more years after surgery). Postoperative scores were recorded with DBS turned OFF and ON. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with a mean follow-up 3.4 ± 0.14 years were enrolled. When baseline scores were compared to scores with the DBS turned ON, significant improvements were noted in total tremor (40%), ADL (67%) and arm tremor scores both on the ipsilateral and the contralateral side at six months and at the last visit of follow-up (all p < 0.05). Ipsilateral arm tremor (∼56%) improvements were milder compared to the contralateral side (∼73%) tremors. CONCLUSION: Unilateral thalamic DBS in ET demonstrates significant long-term benefits for ipsilateral arm tremors and can be offered to higher risk and to select patients.