Fiducial marker implantation in prostate radiation therapy: complication rates and technique.

PURPOSE: This study aims to report the complication rate from the transrectal ultrasound-guided implantation of gold seed markers in prostate radiotherapy, as well as describing the technique used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May 2010 and December 2012, 169 patients with localized prostate cancer had an intraprostatic fiducial marker implantation under transrectal ultrasound guidance. The procedure included prophylactic antibiotic therapy, fleet enema, implantation performed by trained radiation oncologists at our center prior to image-guided radiotherapy. Toxicity occurring between implantation and subsequent radiotherapy start date was assessed. The following parameters were analyzed via medical chart review: antibiotic therapy, anticoagulant interruption, bleeding, pain, prostate volume, number of markers implanted, post-implantation complications and delay before starting radiotherapy. RESULTS: Of the 169 men, 119 (70.4%) underwent insertion of 4 fiducial markers and the other 50 (29.6%) had 3. The procedure was well-tolerated. There was no interruption of the implantation with regards to pain or hemorrhage. No grade 3 or 4 complications were observed. Seed migration rate was 0.32%, for the migration of 2 markers on 626 implanted. Mean prostate volume was 38 cm(3) (range: 10-150 cm(3)). Two patients (1.18%) developed a urinary tract infection following the procedure: prostate volume of 25 and 65 cm(3), four gold seed markers implanted, urinary tract infection resistant to prophylactic antibiotherapy, and treated with antibiotics specific to their infection as determined on urine culture. CONCLUSION: Transrectal fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer is a well-tolerated procedure without major associated complications.

Phase II trial of short-course radiotherapy followed by delayed surgery for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer.

AIM: A prospective phase II study to investigate the feasibility and the rate of complete pathological response (ypT0) after short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery at 8 weeks. METHOD: Operable patients with localized rectal cancer staged T3-4N0/+ or T2N+ were eligible and received 25 Gy (in one-third of patients, the gross tumor volume received a simultaneous integrated boost up to a total of 30 Gy) in five consecutive fractions to the posterior pelvis followed by surgery 8 weeks later. Pathological response and surgical toxicity were assessed in all patients. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (median age 68 years) completed the study. The median distance of the tumour from the anal verge was 6.5 cm. The median interval to surgery was 52 days. Three-quarters of patients underwent a low anterior resection. All underwent complete surgical resection and 100% had pathological negative margins. Ten per cent had stage ypT0 after radiotherapy. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days. Toxicity was comparable with the rates reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: In this study, SCRT followed by delayed surgery was feasible and had acceptable toxicity. All patients underwent complete surgical resection and 100% had negative pathological margins. The rate of ypT0 was 10%.