Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Oncologist ; 2024 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222919

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy. However, in developing countries the incidence rate is higher. The understanding of molecular alterations is essential for evaluating possible targets for more effective systemic therapies. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data of metastatic PSCC (mPSCC) patients who had received at least one prior systemic treatment from 3 Brazilian hospitals. Tumor samples were evaluated using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) Foundation One DX and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The objective was to identify and describe somatic genomic alterations known to be functional or pathogenic and their association with survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were identified, 22 and 18 patients had tumor samples analyzed by IHC and NGS, respectively. PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 1%) was positive in 14 patients (63.6%). Regarding the genomic alterations, 16 patients (88.9%) had some clinically relevant genomic alterations. TP53, TERT, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, and CDKN2B loss were identified in 66.7%, 50%, 50%, 33.3%, 27.8%, and 22.2% of the patients, respectively. No MSI or TMB high (≥10 mutations/MB) cases were identified. NOTCH1 mutation was identified only in HPV-negative patients and it was associated with worse OS (yes: 5.5 vs no: 12.8 months, P = .049) and progression-free survival (yes: 5.5 vs no: 11.7 months, P = .032). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that molecular alterations in mPSCC from developing countries are similar to those from developed countries. Predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response such as TMB high or MSI were not identified. Specific gene mutations may identify patients with worse prognoses and open new avenues for therapeutic development.

2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38994465

ABSTRACT

Objective: To analyze marital outcomes, divorce or separation, and its association with demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathological factors among breast cancer (BC) survivors after 2-years of diagnosis. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of marital status at baseline and at years 1 and 2 of follow-up of women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with invasive BC participating in the AMAZONA III (GBECAM0115) study. The BC diagnosis occurred between January 2016 and March 2018 at 23 institutions in Brazil. Results: Of the 2974 women enrolled in AMAZONA III, 599 were married or living under common law at baseline. Divorce or separation occurred in 35 (5.8%) patients at 2 years of follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, public health insurance coverage was associated with a higher risk of marital status change (8.25% vs. 2.79%, RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.39 - 7.03, p = 0.007). Women who underwent mastectomy, adenomastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy were associated with a higher risk of divorce or separation (8.1% vs. 4.49%, RR 1.97, 95 CI 1.04 - 3.72, p = 0.0366) than those who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Conclusion: Women covered by the public health system and those who underwent mastectomy, adenomastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy were associated with a higher risk of divorce or separation. This evidence further supports the idea that long-term marital stability is associated with a complex interplay between socioeconomic conditions and stressors, such as BC diagnosis and treatment. ClinicalTrials Registration: NCT02663973.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Divorce , Humans , Female , Divorce/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Marital Status , Socioeconomic Factors , Aged , Risk Factors , Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(4): 183, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil. METHODS: A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence. RESULTS: Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Latin America , Consensus , Sunitinib
4.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet;46: x-xx, 2024. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1565340

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective To analyze marital outcomes, divorce or separation, and its association with demographic, socioeconomic, and clinicopathological factors among breast cancer (BC) survivors after 2-years of diagnosis. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of marital status at baseline and at years 1 and 2 of follow-up of women aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with invasive BC participating in the AMAZONA III (GBECAM0115) study. The BC diagnosis occurred between January 2016 and March 2018 at 23 institutions in Brazil. Results Of the 2974 women enrolled in AMAZONA III, 599 were married or living under common law at baseline. Divorce or separation occurred in 35 (5.8%) patients at 2 years of follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, public health insurance coverage was associated with a higher risk of marital status change (8.25% vs. 2.79%, RR 3.09, 95% CI 1.39 - 7.03, p = 0.007). Women who underwent mastectomy, adenomastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy were associated with a higher risk of divorce or separation (8.1% vs. 4.49%, RR 1.97, 95 CI 1.04 - 3.72, p = 0.0366) than those who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Conclusion Women covered by the public health system and those who underwent mastectomy, adenomastectomy or skin-sparing mastectomy were associated with a higher risk of divorce or separation. This evidence further supports the idea that long-term marital stability is associated with a complex interplay between socioeconomic conditions and stressors, such as BC diagnosis and treatment. ClinicalTrials Registration: NCT02663973.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms , Divorce , Marital Status
5.
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet ; 45(9): e535-e541, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37846186

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) biomarkers, such as hormone receptors expression, are crucial to guide therapy in BC patients. Antiandrogens have been studied in BC; however, limited data are available on androgen receptor (AR) expression test methodology. We aim to report the core needle biopsy (CNB) accuracy for AR expression in BC. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage I-III invasive BC from a single institution were included. Androgen receptor expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 1 and 10% cutoff and the AR expression in surgical specimens (SS) was the gold standard. Kappa coefficients were used to evaluate the intraprocedural agreement. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included, with a mean age of 61 years old and 84% were Luminal A or B tumors. The prevalence of AR expression in all BC samples was 87.5% using a cutoff ≥ 10% in SS. With a cutoff value ≥ 1%, CNB had an accuracy of 95.8% (Kappa value = 0.645; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.272-1.000; p < 0.001) and 86.1% (Kappa value = 0.365; 95% CI: 0.052-0.679; p < 0.001) when ≥ 10% cutoff was used for AR positivity. Androgen receptor expression in CNB (cutoff ≥ 1%) had a sensitivity of 98.5%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 97.0%, and a negative predictive value of 76.9% in the detection of AR expression in SS. CONCLUSION: Core needle biopsy has good accuracy in evaluating AR expression in BC. The accuracy of CNB decreases with higher cutoff values for AR positivity.


OBJETIVO: Biomarcadores, como a expressão de receptores hormonais, são cruciais para guiar a terapia de pacientes com câncer de mama. Apesar de ter sido estudado, poucos dados estão disponíveis sobre o método de testagem. Buscamos avaliar a precisão da biópsia com agulha de grande calibre (CNB, na sigla em inglês) para a expressão de receptores androgênicos (AR, na sigla em inglês) no câncer de mama. MéTODOS: Foram incluídos pacientes de uma única instituição diagnosticados com câncer de mama invasivo estágio I-III. A expressão de AR foi avaliada por imunohistoquímica, com valores de cutoff de 1 e 10%. A expressão de AR em espécimes cirúrgicos foi o padrão ouro. O coeficiente Kappa foi usado para avaliar a concordância entre procedimentos. RESULTADOS: Foi incluído um total de 72 pacientes, com idade média de 61 anos; 84% eram tumores luminais A ou B. A prevalência da expressão de AR em todas as amostras foi de 87.5%, com cutoff ≥ 10%. Com um valor de cutoff ≥ 1%, a CNB teve precisão de 95.8% (Kappa = 0.64; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0.272­1.000; p < 0.001) e 86.1% (Kappa = 0.365; CI95%: 0.052­0.679]; p < 0.001) quando um cutoff ≥ 10% foi usado para AR positivo. A expressão de AR na CNB (cutoff ≥ 1%) teve a sensibilidade de 98.5%, especificidade de 60%, valor preditivo positivo de 97.0% e valor preditivo negativo de 76.9% na detecção. CONCLUSãO: |Biópsia com agulha de grande calibre tem uma boa precisão em avaliar a expressão de AR no câncer de mama. A precisão do método cai com valores elevados de cutoff para AR positivo.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Middle Aged , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Androgens , Biomarkers, Tumor
6.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(2): e58-e69, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36266221

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC. METHODS: A panel of 51 invited medical oncologists and urologists convened in May of 2021 with the aim of discussing and providing recommendations regarding the most relevant issues concerning staging methods, antineoplastic therapy, osteoclast-targeted therapy, and patient follow-up in nmCRPC. Panel members considered the available evidence and their practical experience to address the 73 multiple-choice questions presented. RESULTS: Key recommendations and findings include the reliance on prostate-specific antigen doubling time for treatment decisions, the absence of a clear preference between conventional and novel (i.e., positron-emission tomography-based) imaging techniques, the increasing role of ARSis in various settings, the general view that ARSis have similar efficacy. Panelists highlighted the slight preference for darolutamide, when safety is of greater concern, and a continued need to develop high-level evidence to guide the intensity of follow-up in this subset of prostate cancer. DISCUSSION: Despite the limitations associated with a consensus panel, the topics addressed are relevant in current practice, and the recommendations can help practicing clinicians to provide state-of-the-art treatment to patients with nmCRPC in Brazil and other countries with similar healthcare settings.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/therapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Consensus , Brazil , Osteoclasts
7.
Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet ; Rev. bras. ginecol. obstet;45(9): 535-541, 2023. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521774

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective Breast cancer (BC) biomarkers, such as hormone receptors expression, are crucial to guide therapy in BC patients. Antiandrogens have been studied in BC; however, limited data are available on androgen receptor (AR) expression test methodology. We aim to report the core needle biopsy (CNB) accuracy for AR expression in BC. Methods Patients diagnosed with stage I-III invasive BC from a single institution were included. Androgen receptor expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using 1 and 10% cutoff and the AR expression in surgical specimens (SS) was the gold standard. Kappa coefficients were used to evaluate the intraprocedural agreement. Results A total of 72 patients were included, with a mean age of 61 years old and 84% were Luminal A or B tumors. The prevalence of AR expression in all BC samples was 87.5% using a cutoff ≥ 10% in SS. With a cutoff value ≥ 1%, CNB had an accuracy of 95.8% (Kappa value = 0.645; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.272-1.000; p< 0.001) and 86.1% (Kappa value = 0.365; 95% CI: 0.052-0.679; p< 0.001) when ≥ 10% cutoff was used for AR positivity. Androgen receptor expression in CNB (cutoff ≥ 1%) had a sensitivity of 98.5%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 97.0%, and a negative predictive value of 76.9% in the detection of AR expression in SS. Conclusion Core needle biopsy has good accuracy in evaluating AR expression in BC. The accuracy of CNB decreases with higher cutoff values for AR positivity.


Resumo Objetivo Biomarcadores, como a expressão de receptores hormonais, são cruciais para guiar a terapia de pacientes com câncer de mama. Apesar de ter sido estudado, poucos dados estão disponíveis sobre o método de testagem. Buscamos avaliar a precisão da biópsia com agulha de grande calibre (CNB, na sigla em inglês) para a expressão de receptores androgênicos (AR, na sigla em inglês) no câncer de mama. Métodos Foram incluídos pacientes de uma única instituição diagnosticados com câncer de mama invasivo estágio I-III. A expressão de AR foi avaliada por imunohistoquímica, com valores de cutoff de 1 e 10%. A expressão de AR em espécimes cirúrgicos foi o padrão ouro. O coeficiente Kappa foi usado para avaliar a concordância entre procedimentos. Resultados Foi incluído um total de 72 pacientes, com idade média de 61 anos; 84% eram tumores luminais A ou B. A prevalência da expressão de AR em todas as amostras foi de 87.5%, com cutoff ≥ 10%. Com um valor de cutoff ≥ 1%, a CNB teve precisão de 95.8% (Kappa = 0.64; intervalo de confiança [IC] 95%: 0.272-1.000; p< 0.001) e 86.1% (Kappa = 0.365; CI95%: 0.052-0.679]; p< 0.001) quando um cutoff ≥ 10% foi usado para AR positivo. A expressão de AR na CNB (cutoff ≥ 1%) teve a sensibilidade de 98.5%, especificidade de 60%, valor preditivo positivo de 97.0% e valor preditivo negativo de 76.9% na detecção. Conclusão -Biópsia com agulha de grande calibre tem uma boa precisão em avaliar a expressão de AR no câncer de mama. A precisão do método cai com valores elevados de cutoff para AR positivo.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Immunohistochemistry , Receptors, Androgen , Biomarkers, Tumor , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
8.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 9602, 2022 06 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35688846

ABSTRACT

In this work, an intercomparison of sensitization effects produced by gold (GNP) and dextran-coated iron oxide (SPION-DX) nanoparticles in M059J and U87 human glioblastoma cells was performed using 6 MV-photons. Three variables were mapped: the nanoparticle material, treatment concentration, and cell radiosensitivity. For U87, GNP treatments resulted in high sensitization enhancement ratios (SER[Formula: see text] up to 2.04). More modest effects were induced by SPION-DX, but still significant reductions in survival were achieved (maximum SER[Formula: see text] ). For the radiosensitive M059J, sensitization by both NPs was poor. SER[Formula: see text] increased with the degree of elemental uptake in the cells, but not necessarily with treatment concentration. For GNP, where exposure concentration and elemental uptake were found to be proportional, SER[Formula: see text] increased linearly with concentration in both cell lines. For SPION-DX, saturation of sensitization enhancement and metal uptake occurred at high exposures. Fold change in the [Formula: see text] ratios extracted from survival curves are reduced by the presence of SPION-DX but strongly increased by GNPs , suggesting that sensitization by GNPs occurs mainly via promotion of lethal damage, while for SPION-DX repairable damage dominates. The NPs were more effective in eliminating the radioresistant glioblastoma cells, an interesting finding, as resistant cells are key targets to improve treatment outcome.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Metal Nanoparticles , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Gold/pharmacology , Humans , Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles , Photons , Radiation-Sensitizing Agents/pharmacology
9.
Prostate Int ; 9(1): 54-59, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33912515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to pathologico-clinical features, patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) are stratified into distinct risk groups (low-risk, intermediate-risk or high-risk). Data have demonstrated that 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (68Ga-PSMA PET/CT) is superior to conventional radiological exams (CT or MRI and bone scintigraphy) in the primary staging of high-risk localized PCa. However, it is still unknown if in a population of high-risk PCa, there would be a subgroup of patients with a higher probability of identifying metastatic disease by the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from patients with localized PCa who underwent 68GA-PSMA PET/CT for primary staging from four institutions were retrospectively collected. We selected patients with at least one D'Amico classification risk factor (International Society of Urological Pathology ≥ IV and/or prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/ml). To detect an association between extent of disease and number of risk factors as well as International Society of Urological Pathology prostate cancer grade, contingency tables were used, and Fisher Exact Test was performed. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2020, 60 patients underwent a 68GA-PSMA PET/CT for primary staging of high-risk localized PCa. Regarding the number of risk factors, 37 patients (62%) had one risk factor, and 23 (38%) had two risk factors. In the subgroup of patients with metastatic disease (n = 22), those with two risk factors had higher incidence of metastatic disease, and it was statistically significant (p = 0.011). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis demonstrated that 68GA-PSMA PET/CT was able to identify advanced disease in more than one-third of patients with high-risk disease especially those with two adverse risk factors.

10.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 146(7): 1829-1845, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32410064

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The outcome of RCC has improved considerably in the last few years, and the treatment options have increased. LACOG-GU and LARCG held a consensus meeting to develop guidelines to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of RCC patients. METHODS: Eighty questions addressing relevant advanced RCC treatments were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. Consensus was determined as 75% agreement. For questions with less than 75% agreement, a new discussion was held, and consensus was determined by the majority of votes after the second voting session. RESULTS: The recommendations were based on the highest level of scientific evidence or by the opinion of the RCC experts when no relevant research data were available. CONCLUSION: This manuscript provides guidance for advanced RCC treatment according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG expert recommendations.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures/methods , Disease Management , Expert Testimony , Humans , Latin America , Metastasectomy/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Standard of Care
11.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(4): 244-251.e4, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32303427

ABSTRACT

Combination treatments with immuno-oncology (IO) agents and IO agents plus a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) have been approved for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). No direct comparisons have been performed among these treatment options. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the available regimens for first-line treatment in terms of survival benefit and efficacy. In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review statement, a systematic search of reported studies was performed in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE up to May 31, 2019. Network meta-analysis models were adjusted using the Bayesian method. Four randomized clinical trials, with a total of 3758 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Considering systemic therapy, 1880 patients had received sunitinib and 550, 432, 442, and 454 patients had received ipilimumab plus nivolumab (ipi + nivo), pembrolizumab plus axitinib (pembro + axi), avelumab plus axitinib (avelu + axi), and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo + bev). No difference was found in overall survival between ipi + nivo and pembro + axi for the intention to treat population (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.92-1.97). No difference was found in progression-free survival among the treatments. The overall response rate (ORR) was superior with pembro + axi and avelu + axi compared with the ORR with the other treatments (atezo + bev vs. pembro + axi: HR, 0.66; 95% CrI, 0.52-0.84; ipi + nivo vs. pembro + axi: HR, 0.73; 95% CrI, 0.59-0.90; atezo + bev vs. avelu + axi: HR, 0.55; 95% CrI, 0.43-0.71; avelu + axi vs. ipi + nivo: HR, 1.66; 95% CrI, 1.31-2.12), with no differences across them (HR, 1.21; 95% CrI, 0.95-1.53). In the present indirect comparison, for an intention to treat population, we found no survival differences between pembro + axi and ipi + nivo. All treatments showed better progression-free survival compared with sunitinib that was similar among them. The combination of an IO agent (pembrolizumab or avelumab) and axitinib seemed to be the most effective therapy for the ORR.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Survival Rate
12.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 18(3): e254-e259, 2020 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32139302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy with higher incidence in developing countries. Treatment options include surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic chemotherapy. However, effective treatments for advanced disease are lacking. To understand the biology underlying PSCC may help the development of new therapeutic strategies. The objective of this study was to evaluate immunohistochemical expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and p16 in PSCC and its association with clinicopathologic features and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 40 patients with PSCC from an academic institution in Brazil was analyzed. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes were retrospectively collected. PD-L1 and p16 immunohistochemical expression were performed in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens. PD-L1 was positive with any staining in more than 1% of tumor, and p16 was positive in more than 10%. Associations were performed using the Mann-Whitney and Fisher exact test. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate survival rates with log-rank. RESULTS: Of 35 patients, 5 were excluded, 4 owing to a lack of data and 1 owing to no tumor available; 18 (51.4%) patients were PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+). PD-L1+ was associated with larger tumors (P = .027). There was an association between PD-L1+ and p16 expression (P = .002). PD-L1+ was more frequent in grade II and III disease than grade I (77.8% vs. 22.2%) and was expressed in all patients with grade III disease. Lymph node involvement was associated with PD-L1 expression (69.2% PD-L1+ vs. 30.8% PD-L1-negative). The 5-year mortality was 37.1%. CONCLUSION: PD-L1 expression appears to be associated with p16 expression, larger tumors, and worse clinical outcomes in PSCC and may provide clinical data for new studies to evaluate anti-PD-L1 immune therapies.


Subject(s)
B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16/metabolism , Endemic Diseases/statistics & numerical data , Penile Neoplasms/pathology , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Penile Neoplasms/epidemiology , Penile Neoplasms/metabolism , Penile Neoplasms/surgery , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate
13.
Ther Adv Urol ; 11: 1756287219872324, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31523281

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Renal cell cancer (RCC) is one of the 10 most common cancers in the world, and its incidence is increasing, whereas mortality is declining only in developed countries. Therefore, two collaborative groups, The Latin American Oncology Cooperative Group-Genitourinary Section (LACOG-GU) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG), held a consensus meeting to develop this guideline. METHODS: Issues (134) related to the treatment of RCC were previously formulated by a panel of experts. The voting panel comprised 26 specialists (urologists and medical oncologists) from the LACOG-GU/LARCG. A consensus was reached if 75% agreement was achieved. If there was less concordance, a new discussion was undertaken, and a consensus was determined by the most votes after a second voting session. RESULTS: The expert meeting provided recommendations that were in line with the global literature; 75.0% of the recommendations made by the panel of experts were evidence-based level A, 22.5% of the recommendations were level B, and 2.5% of the recommendations were level D. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests recommendations for the surgical treatment of RCC according to the LACOG-GU/LARCG experts.

14.
BMC Cancer ; 19(1): 487, 2019 May 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122212

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Testosterone suppression is the standard treatment for advanced prostate cancer, and it is associated with side-effects that impair patients' quality of life, like sexual dysfunction, osteoporosis, weight gain, and increased cardiovascular risk. We hypothesized that abiraterone acetate with prednisone (AAP) and apalutamide, alone or in combination, can be an effective hormonal therapy also possibly decreasing castration-associated side effects. METHODS: Phase II, open-label, randomized, efficacy trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) and Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) versus apalutamide versus the combination of AAP (without ADT) and apalutamide. Key eligibility criteria are confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma; biochemical relapse after definitive treatment (PSA ≥ 4 ng/ml and doubling time less than 10 months, or PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml); newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic prostate cancer; asymptomatic to moderately symptomatic regarding bone symptoms. Patients with other histology besides adenocarcinoma or previous use of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy were excluded. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to study and validate regimens such as new hormonal agents that may add benefit to castration with an acceptable safety profile. We aim to evaluate if apalutamide in monotherapy or in combination with AAP is an effective and safety hormonal treatment that can spare patients of androgen deprivation therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on October 16, 2017, under Identifier: NCT02867020.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Goserelin/therapeutic use , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Thiohydantoins/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Disease-Free Survival , Goserelin/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Testosterone/blood , Thiohydantoins/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
16.
Rev Col Bras Cir ; 45(6): e2030, 2018 Nov 29.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30517360

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: to study the expression of the tissue factor (TF) and its correlation with prognosis and survival in patients with gastric carcinoma. METHODS: we measured the immunohistochemical expression of TF in 50 specimens of gastric adenocarcinomas from patients submitted to curative surgery. We then compared the intensity of its expression with clinical and pathological data, TNM staging, prognostic factors and survival. RESULTS: all tumors displayed TF expression; the intensity of TF expression was not associated with TNM stage, clinical or pathological variables or general survival. CONCLUSION: TF has a high expression in gastric carcinoma, but that it is not useful as a prognostic marker.


OBJETIVO: estudar a expressão do fator tecidual (FT) e sua correlação com o prognostico e sobrevida em pacientes com carcinoma gástrico. MÉTODOS: verificamos a expressão imuno-histoquímica do FT em 50 espécimes de adenocarcinomas gástricos de pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico com intenção curativa. A intensidade da sua expressão foi comparada com dados clínicos e patológicos, estadiamento TNM, fatores prognósticos e sobrevida. RESULTADOS: houve expressão do FT em todos os tumores; a intensidade de expressão do FT não foi associada com estágio TNM, variáveis clínicas ou patológicas ou sobrevida geral. CONCLUSÃO: este estudo mostra que o FT tem uma expressão elevada em carcinoma gástrico, mas que este não é útil como marcador de prognóstico.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Thromboplastin/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality
17.
J Glob Oncol ; 4: 1-8, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29281478

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although multiple therapies have emerged for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), it is unclear whether application of these agents is consistent in developed and developing countries. We sought to determine patterns of care for mRCC in Brazil as a representative developing country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A commercial database was used to acquire information pertaining to patients with mRCC receiving treatment at private or public hospitals in Brazil between March 2013 and October 2016. Basic clinical and demographic criteria were available, as well as information to ascertain the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk. Treatment-related data across multiple lines of therapy were collected. RESULTS: Of 4,379 patients assessed, 3,990 (91%) had metastatic disease, and 26%, 48%, and 26% of patients had good, intermediate, and poor International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk disease, respectively. Although 3,149 patients (79%) received first-line therapy, only 641 (20%) and 152 (5%) received second- and third-line therapy, respectively. In the first-line setting, vascular endothelial growth factor-directed agents represented the most commonly used therapy, whereas in the second-line setting, vascular endothelial growth factor- and mammalian target of rapamycin-directed agents were used with similar frequency. Marked differences were seen in receipt of systemic therapy on the basis of treatment in private or public hospitals. CONCLUSION: Relative to developed countries, marked attrition is noted between each subsequent line of therapy in Brazil. Patterns of care also vary greatly in private and public settings, pointing to financial constraints as a potential cause for discordances in treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell/therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Young Adult
18.
Rev. Col. Bras. Cir ; 45(6): e2030, 2018. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-976938

ABSTRACT

RESUMO Objetivo: estudar a expressão do fator tecidual (FT) e sua correlação com o prognostico e sobrevida em pacientes com carcinoma gástrico. Métodos: verificamos a expressão imuno-histoquímica do FT em 50 espécimes de adenocarcinomas gástricos de pacientes submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico com intenção curativa. A intensidade da sua expressão foi comparada com dados clínicos e patológicos, estadiamento TNM, fatores prognósticos e sobrevida. Resultados: houve expressão do FT em todos os tumores; a intensidade de expressão do FT não foi associada com estágio TNM, variáveis clínicas ou patológicas ou sobrevida geral. Conclusão: este estudo mostra que o FT tem uma expressão elevada em carcinoma gástrico, mas que este não é útil como marcador de prognóstico.


ABSTRACT Objective: to study the expression of the tissue factor (TF) and its correlation with prognosis and survival in patients with gastric carcinoma. Methods: we measured the immunohistochemical expression of TF in 50 specimens of gastric adenocarcinomas from patients submitted to curative surgery. We then compared the intensity of its expression with clinical and pathological data, TNM staging, prognostic factors and survival. Results: all tumors displayed TF expression; the intensity of TF expression was not associated with TNM stage, clinical or pathological variables or general survival. Conclusion: TF has a high expression in gastric carcinoma, but that it is not useful as a prognostic marker.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Thromboplastin/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Prognosis , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Immunohistochemistry , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging
19.
Acta méd. (Porto Alegre) ; 39(2): 346-355, 2018.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-995859

ABSTRACT

Introdução: O câncer é um distúrbio genético no qual ocorre a perda do controle da proliferação celular. De maneira geral, podemos dividir os casos de câncer em esporádicos (mutações somáticas restritas ao tumor), que são a maioria, e hereditários (mutações germinativas presentes em todas as células do indivíduo), que em conjunto correspondem a aproximadamente a 10% de todos os casos. É importante compreender o papel da Oncogenética na identificação de pacientes com risco aumentado para desenvolvimento de câncer para possibilitar medidas de detecção precoce, de prevenção e de tratamento, diferenciadas das recomendadas para a população em geral. Métodos: Foi realizada revisão da literatura através dos sites de busca PubMed e Scielo, bem como através de literatura e Guidelines pertinentes à área da Oncogenética. Resultados: A indicação de investigação genética molecular deve ser baseada em uma suspeita de câncer hereditário, sugerida pela história de câncer do paciente e de sua família. Os critérios de indicação variam para as diversas síndromes hereditárias. Assim, torna-se importante o aconselhamento genético pré e pós-teste, a fim de direcionar a investigação mais indicada para cada caso e permitir que o paciente possa realizar escolhas informadas e adaptar-se ao risco e/ou à condição que esse diagnóstico traz à sua vida. Conclusão: A fim de tornar a oncogenética acessível à população em risco, é necessário capacitar mais profissionais no aconselhamento genético, buscar um maior acesso aos exames moleculares especialmente no serviço público de saúde, garantir a qualidade dos testes realizados por diferentes centros e a adequada interpretação de seus resultados.


Introduction: Cancer is a genetic disorder in which occurs a loss of control of cell proliferation. In general, we can divide cancer cases into sporadic (tumor-restricted somatic mutations), which are the majority, and hereditary (germ mutations present in all the cells of the individual), which together account for approximately 10% of all cases. It is important to understand the role of Oncogenetics in identifying patients at increased risk for cancer development in order to enable early detection, prevention and treatment measures, unlike those recommended for the general population. Methods: A review of the literature was performed through PubMed and Scielo databases, as well as through literature and guidelines considered relevant to the area of Oncogenetics. Results: The indication of molecular genetic research should be based on a suspected hereditary cancer, suggested by the patient's and his family's cancer history. The indication criteria vary for the various hereditary syndromes. Thus, pre and post-test genetic counseling becomes important in order to direct the most appropriate investigation for each case, allowing the patient to make informed decisions and to adapt to the risk and / or to the condition this diagnosis brings to his / her life. Conclusion: In order to make Oncogenetics accessible to the population at risk, it is necessary to train more professionals in genetic counseling, to seek greater access to molecular tests, especially in the public health service, to ensure the quality of the tests carried out by different centers and also to provide adequate interpretation of the results.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/genetics
20.
Acta méd. (Porto Alegre) ; 39(2): 515-524, 2018.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-995897

ABSTRACT

Introdução: Atualmente, o câncer de próstata é uma doença bastante prevalente em homens idosos, portanto é com frequência foco de campanhas públicas de conscientização para a sua prevenção. Neste estudo, tem-se como objetivo investigar a utilidade do rastreamento populacional, bem como avaliar o impacto destas campanhas sobre a sociedade. Métodos: As bases de dados Medline foram consultadas com vistas a buscar artigos de maior nível de evidência publicados nos últimos 10 anos. Resultados: os principais estudos sobre rastreamento do câncer de próstata (PLCO e ERSPC) mostraram resultados discordantes sobre o impacto na mortalidade geral e específica. Em metanálise feita pela Cochrane não se encontrou evidência suficiente para afirmar redução da mortalidade específica por Câncer de Próstata. Além disso, o rastreamento está relacionado à sobrediagnóstico. Conclusão: A indicação do rastreamento sistemático da população brasileira masculina pelas campanhas de prevenção contra o câncer de próstata mostrou-se controversa. A individualização da conduta, expondo ao paciente os potenciais riscos e benefícios, mostra-se a conduta mais recomendada por diferentes entidades.


Introduction: Nowadays the prostate cancer is a very prevalent disease, especially in elderly men, therefore is frequently focus of public campaigns of awareness about its prevention. The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of populational screening, as well as evaluate the impact of this campaigns in the society. Methods: Medline database was consulted for articles with the best level of evidence published in the last 10 years. Results: The most important studies about prostate cancer screening (PLCO and ERSPC) had discordant results about the impact in general and specific mortality. A meta-analysis by Cochrane did not found sufficient evidence to affirm reduction in specific mortality due to prostate cancer. Moreover the screening is related to over diagnosis. Conclusion: The indication of systematic screening of Brazilian male population by prostate cancer screening campaigns is controversial, the shared decision, exposing to the patient the potential risks and benefits, is the most recommended recommendation by different medical societies.


Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Awareness , Mass Screening
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL