[Adverse Drug Reactions in Geriatric Psychiatric Patients - Influence of Potentially Inappropriate Drugs]. / Unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen in der Gerontopsychiatrie.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the extent to which "potentially inappropriate drugs" (PID) are associated with an increased risk for adverse drug reactions (ADR). METHODS: Data from 304 geriatric psychiatric inpatients was collected. Medical documentation was used to find indications of ADRs. Causal relationship between the ADR and the prescribed drugs was assessed by experts. RESULTS: Almost 30 % of patients received ≥ 1 PID before admission to hospital, in comparison to 22 % at discharge. Increasing number of total prescriptions and the diagnosis of schizophrenia resulted in an increased risk for receiving ≥ 1 PID. Higher age and dementia were protective factors. Patients receiving ≥ 1 PID had a 5-fold increased risk of experiencing ≥ 1 ADR. Risk for an ADR increased with number of PID prescriptions. Patients treated with ≥ 1 PID had a 4-fold increased risk of experiencing severe ADRs. Risk for severe ADRs was 10-fold higher in patients treated with ≥ 2 PIDs. CONCLUSION: The PRISCUS list predicts significant risk factors for the occurrence of ADRs in the geriatric psychiatric setting.

Diagnosis and Management of Severe Asthma in Switzerland: Analysis of Survey Results Conducted with Specialists and General Practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Severe asthma commonly affects 5-10% of the asthmatic population and accounts for approximately 50% of the overall asthma costs. OBJECTIVE: This analysis investigated how severe asthma is diagnosed, treated, and managed by specialists and general practitioners (GPs) in Switzerland. METHODS: Two surveys, one each among specialists (N = 44) and GPs (N = 153), were conducted to understand their self-perception on diagnosis, treatment, and management of severe asthma. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the specialists felt very confident and 43% confident in recognizing the symptoms of severe asthma and diagnosing severe asthma. In contrast, 9% of the GPs were very confident and 59% confident in diagnosing severe asthma. More specific diagnostic tests for severe asthma, like total and specific immunoglobulin E levels and measurement of the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, were run by specialists (χ2 = 171.4; df = 15, p < 0.001). GPs and specialists were using different measurements to assess severe asthma (χ2 = 385.2; df = 13, p < 0.001) and their prescribing patterns differed significantly (χ2 = 189.8; df = 10, p < 0.001). GPs referred patients with severe asthma if the diagnosis was unclear (24%), if treatment failure occurred (26%), and if the patients were at high risk (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral corticosteroids (OCSs) are considered as background therapy for severe asthma by GPs and specialists. In order to reduce the OCS burden, there is a need to improve the awareness for other add-on therapies. A joint collaboration between GPs and specialists is the key to leverage therapeutic strategies together.

Roadmap for the treatment of heart failure patients after hospital discharge: an interdisciplinary consensus paper.

The transition period from the hospital to the outpatient setting is a critical phase when managing heart failure. A well-structured transition is paramount and helps to ensure a tight follow-up schedule for the heart failure patient, thereby improving treatment outcomes. This article aims to provide guidance for the first three follow-up visits after hospital discharge, with a focus on monitoring heart failure patients and up-titrating their medication in primary care.

Sex and body weight are major determinants of venlafaxine pharmacokinetics.

We assessed the effect of body weight and BMI on plasma concentrations of venlafaxine (VEN), O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN), active moiety (AM=VEN+ODVEN), and dose-corrected plasma concentrations (C/D). A database containing concentrations of VEN and ODVEN including 737 of 1594 eligible patients was analyzed. Analyses included sex, body weight, and BMI as well as concentrations of VEN, ODVEN, AM, and C/D. A positive correlation was detected between body weight and daily dosage (rs=0.168, P<0.001). A negative correlation was found between body weight and AM (rs=-0.124, P=0.001) and ODVEN (rs=-0.137, P<0.001). Negative correlations were also found between body weight and C/D ratios (C/D VEN: rs=-0.134, P<0.001, C/D ODVEN: rs=-0.239, P<0.001, C/D AM: rs=-0.256, P<0.001). No correlations were detected between BMI and concentrations for VEN, ODVEN, and AM. Comparing low-BMI (<20 kg/m²), medium-BMI (20-29.9 kg/m²), and high-BMI (≥30 kg/m²) groups, higher values of some pharmacokinetic variables in the lower BMI group did not remain significant after controlling for sex. Women had higher VEN, ODVEN, AM, and C/D values for AM, VEN, and ODVEN than men (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Our results highlight the role of different pharmacokinetically relevant parameters and foremost of sex as mediators for the effect of BMI on VEN metabolism.

Antidepressant polypharmacy and the potential of pharmacokinetic interactions: Doxepin but not mirtazapine causes clinically relevant changes in venlafaxine metabolism.

BACKGROUND: To uncover pharmacokinetic interactions between venlafaxine and doxepin or mirtazapine in a naturalistic sample. METHODS: A therapeutic drug monitoring database containing plasma concentrations of venlafaxine (VEN) and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN) was analyzed. We included 1067 of 1594 patients in the analysis. Three study groups were considered; a group of patients under venlafaxine without confounding medications, V0 (n = 905), a group of patients co-medicated with doxepin, VDOX (n = 25) and a second group, co-medicated with mirtazapine, VMIR, n = 137. Plasma concentrations of VEN, ODVEN and the clinically relevant active moiety, sum of venlafaxine and O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVEN) (AM), as well as dose-adjusted plasma concentrations (C/D) were compared. RESULTS: Median concentrations in the doxepin group showed 57.7% and 194.4% higher values for AM and VEN respectively; these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001 for AM and p = 0.002 for VEN). Similar differences were detected for C/D concentrations of active moiety and VEN (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001) with higher values also in the doxepin group. The ratios ODVEN/VEN were lower in the doxepin group (p < 0.001). A co-medication with mirtazapine did not cause any changes in venlafaxine metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: Higher concentrations for VEN and AM imply an inhibiting effect of doxepin on the metabolism of venlafaxine, although the huge variability of concentrations has to be taken into account. It is recommended to monitor plasma concentrations in combination treatment to avoid problems in safety and efficacy. LIMITATIONS: Despite the large size of our study sample, the naturalistic nature of this data may arise some concerns of information bias potentially resulting from non-standardized data recording.