Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Avicenna J Med ; 3(3): 57-62, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24251232

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the prevalence of unethical behavior and how is perceived among health care providers. The aim of this study is to assess such behavior and how is perceived. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study among three groups of professionals. Total participants were 370 and included medical staff, medical residents, and nurses in five medical specialties in four tertiary hospitals in Saudi Arabia (two Ministry of Health Hospitals and two military Hospitals). Participants were asked to rate their agreement with occurrence of 15 "negative" unethical behavior scenarios in their workplace. The scenarios covered areas of "respect for persons", "interprofessional relationships", and "empathy with patients". RESULTS: Majority of respondents agreed that "unethical" behavior occurred in their workplace, including confidentiality being compromised (36.3%), informed consent not taken properly (60.2%), and bad news not well-delivered (62.2%). Other significant area agreement included doctors lacking empathy (47.8%), patient autonomy not fully respected (42.5%), discrimination (41.2%), and being pressurized to write inaccurate reports (31.2%). Respondents in medicine had the lowest rate of agreement and those in psychiatry had the highest (mean of 49.8% and 82.3%, respectively). Respondents with length of employment of less than 6 years had significantly higher agreement that unethical behavior occurs compared to those with length of employment of more than 6 years. Males were more likely than females to agree that unethical behavior occurs. The biggest difference was seen in the behavior of "informed consent not properly taken" with a gender margin of 18.7% (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is high prevalence of behavior that is considered unethical as perceived by various health care workers at Saudi hospitals.

5.
J Vasc Access ; 3(4): 164-8, 2002.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17639480

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proper choice of the vascular access plays a crucial role in dialysis outcome. The prevalence and types of vascular access have not yet been investigated in Egypt. Our work aims to study prevalence, patency rate, complications and factors affecting different types of vascular access in Egypt. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied one thousand hemodialysis patients in eighteen dialysis centers in Egypt. RESULTS: 93% of the patients had natural arteriovenous access while 7% had synthetic arteriovenous grafts. The patency rate of natural fistulae was significantly higher than that of synthetic grafts (3.07 +/- 3 versus 1.5 +/- 2 years respectively). Many arteriovenous grafts were done because natural arteriovenous fistula was unsuitable or after its failure. Natural radiocephalic fistula was the most prevalent type (67.3%), with a patency rate significantly higher than all other sites (3.3 +/- 3 years). Only 10.2% of patients had a fistula created before the start of dialysis. Thrombosis rate was significantly higher in synthetic arteriovenous grafts (32.4%) than in natural arteriovenous fistulae (9.3%). Diabetes and hyperlipidemia significantly decreased the patency rate of natural arteriovenous fistula but not that of synthetic grafts. Patency of arteriovenous fistula in non-diabetics was 3.2 +/- 3.1 years versus 2 +/- 1.9 years in diabetics. Patency of arteriovenous fistula in non-hyperlipidemic patients was 3.1 +/- 3 years versus 1.5 +/- 1.6 years with hyperlipidemia. Temporary vascular access prior to permanent access was used in 90% of patients, of which femoral catheters were used in 53.6%, jugular catheters in 38% and subclavian catheters in 8.4%. The incidence of primary access failure was significantly higher in patients with a previous subclavian catheter insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Natural arteriovenous fistula is the access of choice for hemodialysis patients in Egypt. It has higher patency rate, lower complication rate and nephrologists prefer it. Diabetes and hyperlipidemia decrease patency rate of natural arteriovenous fistula but not synthetic grafts. Subclavian catheter is better avoided due to increased incidence of primary access failure.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...