Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
Int J Spine Surg ; 9: 30, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26273548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cervical disc arthroplasty has become a technique for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Clinically, the need to accurately assess the neural elements at the operative and adjacent levels is critical postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively measure the amount of MRI artifact produced by various cervical total disc replacements. METHODS: T1 and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MRI sequences were collected on the cervical spine (C2-T1) of a 68 year-old unembalmed male cadaver. A discectomy was performed at C5-6, followed by successive implantation of six different total disc replacements. The scans were quantitatively evaluated by three of the authors. The volume of artifact was measured using image analysis software. Qualitative analysis of the adjacent and index neural elements was performed. RESULTS: The artifact in the T2 weighted images was noted to be 58.6±7.3 cm3 for Prestige ST, 14.2±1.3 cm3 for ProDisc-C, 7.5±0.8 cm3 for Discover, 8.0±0.3 cm3 for Prestige LP, 6.6±0.7 cm3 for Bryan, and 7.3±0.6 cm3 for ProDisc-C titanium prototype. Acceptable intraobserver and excellent interobsever correlation was demonstrated using Pearson Correlation and Concordance Correlation Coefficient analysis. The adjacent and implanted level neural elements (spinal cord and neuroforamina) were easily visualized on the T2 weighted images after the implantation of titanium devices (ProDisc-C titanium prototype, Discover, Prestige LP and Bryan). After implantation of a cobalt chrome implant (ProDisc-C), the adjacent level neural elements were easily visualized but the implanted level could not be fully visualized due to distortion of the images. The quality of the distortion was least favorable after the implantation of the stainless steel implant (Prestige ST), where neither the adjacent nor the index level could be fully visualized. CONCLUSION: The volume of the artifact seen following cervical total disc arthroplasty is highly dependent upon the material property of the implant. Quantitative analysis described in this study demonstrated sufficiently low intraobserver and interobserver variability to be considered a reliable technique.

2.
J Orthop Res ; 30(4): 587-92, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22002745

ABSTRACT

Graft subsidence following anterior cervical reconstruction can result in the loss of sagittal balance and recurring foraminal stenosis. This study examined the implant-endplate interface using a cyclic fatigue loading protocol in an attempt to model the subsidence seen in vivo. The superior endplate from 30 cervical vertebrae (C3 to T1) were harvested and biomechanically tested in axial compression with one of three implants: Fibular allograft; titanium mesh cage packed with cancellous chips; and trabecular metal. Each construct was cyclically loaded from 50 to 250 N for 10,000 cycles. Nondestructive cyclic loading of the cervical endplate-implant construct resulted in a stiffer construct independent of the type of the interbody implant tested. The trabecular metal construct demonstrated significantly more axial stability and significantly less subsidence in comparison to the titanium mesh construct. Although the allograft construct resulted in more subsidence than the trabecular metal construct, the difference was not significant and no difference was found when comparing axial stability. For all constructs, the majority of the subsidence during the cyclic testing occurred during the first 500 cycles and was followed by a more gradual settling in the remaining 9,500 cycles.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Compressive Strength/physiology , Intervertebral Disc/physiology , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Total Disc Replacement/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density/physiology , Bone Transplantation/instrumentation , Bone Transplantation/methods , Bone Transplantation/physiology , Cadaver , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Fibula/transplantation , Fractures, Stress/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Total Disc Replacement/instrumentation , Weight-Bearing/physiology
3.
Int J Spine Surg ; 6: 87-92, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25694876

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Biomechanical studies have shown that dynamic stabilization restores the neutral zone and stabilizes the motion segment. Unfortunately, there are limitations to clinical measurement of lumbar motion segments when using routine radiographs. Radiostereometric analysis is a 3-dimensional technique and can measure the spinal motion segment more accurately than techniques using plain film radiographs. The purpose of this study was measure and compare the range of motion after dynamic stabilization, posterior lumbar fusion (PLF), and lumbar discectomy. METHODS: Four patients who underwent lumbar decompression and dynamic stabilization (Dynesys; Zimmer Spine, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana) for treatment of lumbar spondylosis were compared with 4 patients with a similar diagnosis who were treated by PLF and pedicle screw fixation (PLF group) and 8 patients who had undergone lumbar microdiscectomy (discectomy group) for treatment of radiculopathy. During the surgical procedure, 3 to 5 tantalum beads were placed into each of the operative segments. The patients were followed up postoperatively at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. At each follow-up time point, segmental motions (flexion, extension, and total sagittal range of motion [SROM]) were measured by radiostereometric analysis. RESULTS: Flexion, extension, and SROM measured 1.0° ± 0.9°, 1.5° ± 1.3°, and 2.3° ± 1.2°, respectively, in the Dynesys group; 1.0° ± 0.6°, 1.1° ± 0.9°, and 1.5° ± 0.6°, respectively, in the PLF group; and 2.9° ± 2.4°, 2.3° ± 1.5°, and 4.7° ± 2.2°, respectively, in the discectomy group. No significant difference in motion was seen between the Dynesys and PLF groups or between the Dynesys and discectomy groups in extension. Significant differences in motions were seen between the PLF and discectomy groups and between the Dynesys and discectomy groups in flexion (P = .007) and SROM (P = .002). There was no significant change in the measured motions over time. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a significantly lower amount of motion was seen after dynamic stabilization and PLF when compared with discectomy. A future study with a larger cohort is necessary to examine what effect, if any, these motions have on clinical outcomes.

4.
Spine J ; 11(5): 432-9, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21481652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Previous ex vivo studies showed that the properties of commercial cements modified for use in vertebroplasty are not optimal and are associated with several drawbacks, including high exothermic reaction, low cement viscosity and consequent extravasation, and unpredictable wait time after cement preparation. Additionally, strength and stiffness restoration are controversial varying with the cement type, volume injected, and technique used. PURPOSE: To investigate maximum polymerization temperatures and mechanical performance of novel two-solution bone cement (TSBC) modified by the addition of cross-linked poly(methyl methacrylate) nanospheres (η-TSBC) and microspheres (µ-TSBC) in a cadaver vertebroplasty model in comparison to a commercially available cement (KyphX). To study the viability of application of these novel cement formulations in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Ex vivo biomechanical and exothermal evaluation of TSBCs using cadaveric vertebral bodies (VBs). METHODS: Thirty-one cadaveric vertebrae (age, 74±2 years; T score, -1.5±0.5) were disarticulated. Thirteen vertebrae were assigned into three groups and instrumented with thermocouples positioned midbody along the intersection of the midsagittal and midcoronal axes, as well as along the intersection of the midsagittal axis and posterior VB wall. After equilibration at 37°C, 5 mL of cement was injected and temperatures were recorded for 1 hour. The groups were injected with η-TSBC, µ-TSBC, or KyphX. The remaining 18 vertebrae were biomechanically tested. After randomization into three groups, each specimen was fractured in compression and stabilized with 5 mL of each cement type. Each specimen was then retested in axial compression. RESULTS: Temperatures in the central region of the vertebrae were significantly lower (p<.05) when injected with η-TSBC (44°C) in comparison to KyphX (75°C) and µ-TSBC (64°C). A significant difference was not detected between the pre- and postcementing strength (p>.05) of the three groups. There was no significant difference between the average values of stiffness among the cements (p>.05), however there was a significant difference between intact and treated stiffness (p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The TSBC cements decreased the local temperature within the VB while providing similar mechanical strength when compared with vertebrae treated with KyphX.


Subject(s)
Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Bone Cements/pharmacology , Polymethyl Methacrylate/pharmacology , Vertebroplasty/methods , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cadaver , Hot Temperature , Humans , Materials Testing , Nanospheres , Polymerization , Spine/surgery , Stress, Mechanical
5.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 23(4): 236-41, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20072031

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective case series OBJECTIVE: This was designed to precisely measure motion after posterior dynamic stabilization using Dynesys instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Dynesys posterior dynamic stabilization system, which stabilizes the spinal segment while potentially decreasing the risk of adjacent segment disease, is undergoing evaluation by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis without fusion. Evaluation of adjacent segment disease requires precise characterization of motion on the surgical level. Unfortunately, routine clinical radiographic techniques are imprecise and unreliable for full characterization of spinal segment motion. Radiostereometric analysis, which is very precise and reliable for in vivo measurement of motion, was used to examine spinal segment motion after dynamic stabilization with Dynesys. METHODS: Six patients (age 59+/-7 y) underwent posterior decompression followed by posterior stabilization using Dynesys instrumentation (4 one-level, 2 two-levels). Three to 5 tantalum beads were placed in each vertebral body. Postoperative biplanar radiographs were obtained in flexion, extension, right, and left lateral bending, and 3-dimensional reconstruction was performed using radiostereometric analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The translations and rotations of the superior vertebral body were measured relative to the inferior vertebral body. RESULTS: Over the 24-month follow-up period, mean flexion, extension, left, and right lateral bending of the motion segments were noted to be 1.0 degrees, 2.4 degrees, 0.6 degrees, and 0.6 degrees or less, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes in the degree of motion. During follow-up, no significant changes in neutral position of the device were noted in any of the 3 planes, and minimal translation was noted in the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: The Dynesys dynamic instrumentation system seems to stabilize degenerative spondylolisthesis. As expected in the degenerative lumbar spine, the segmental motion of the implanted level in this study was limited and considerably less than normal spinal motion.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular , Spondylolisthesis/surgery , Aged , Decompression, Surgical/methods , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Radiography , Recovery of Function , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 22(8): 602-9, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19956035

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. OBJECTIVE: To compare the amount of segmental motion in the sagittal plane after lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA) measured by using the Cobb technique, quantitative motion analysis (QMA), and radiostereometric analysis (RSA). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The aim of TDA is preservation of motion and therefore essential to properly quantify the motion. Clinically, segmental motion is measured by using the Cobb technique, which involves either the endplates or the implant as radiographic landmarks. This technique has been reported to have large intraobserver and interobserver variability. QMA and RSA are in vivo techniques that can measure the segmental motion with accuracy, but have not been compared with each other or compared with the Cobb technique in the literature. METHODS: Ten patients (6 males and 4 females, 47 + or - 7 y) with lumbar disc degeneration were surgically treated with ProDisc-L (Synthes Inc). Intraoperatively, tantalum beads were inserted into each vertebra and patients were followed postoperatively at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. At each follow-up time-point, biplanar flexion/extension radiographs were obtained and sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the index level was calculated by using the RSA technique. Clinical flexion/extension radiographs were also obtained and the sagittal ROM at the same level was calculated by using a modified Cobb technique. The clinical films were additionally analyzed by Medical Metrics for sagittal ROM using QMA. The results of the 3 measurement techniques were statistically analyzed and compared in pairwise fashion. RESULTS: A significant difference (P = 0.02) was observed between the Cobb technique (5.9 + or - 4.9) and RSA (3.5 + or - 2.4). A trend (P = 0.069) was also seen between QMA (5.7 + or - 4.7) and RSA. On paired-samples correlation, a significantly high correlation was seen between Cobb technique and QMA (r = 0.868, P < 0.001). A larger variability was seen when using the Cobb technique or QMA in comparison to the RSA. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal ROM after TDA was similar between QMA and digital Cobb technique. A larger variability was seen between these techniques and RSA.


Subject(s)
Arthrography/methods , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Zygapophyseal Joint/physiology , Aged , Anthropometry , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Biomechanical Phenomena , Disability Evaluation , Diskectomy/instrumentation , Diskectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Intervertebral Disc/anatomy & histology , Intervertebral Disc/physiology , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Movement/physiology , Pliability , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Prostheses and Implants/standards , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Radiology/methods , Recovery of Function/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Zygapophyseal Joint/anatomy & histology
7.
Spine J ; 9(12): 1016-23, 2009 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19819193

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with bone graft and a rigid screw-plate construct is an established procedure for treatment of cervical neural compression. Despite its reliability in relieving symptoms, there is a high rate of construct failure, especially in multilevel cases. PURPOSE: There has been no study evaluating the biomechanical effects of screw angulation on construct stability; this study investigates the C4-C7 construct stability and load-sharing properties among varying screw angulations in a rigid plate-screw construct. STUDY DESIGN: A finite element model of a two-level cervical corpectomy with static anterior cervical plate. METHODS: A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of an intact C3-T1 segment was developed and validated. From this intact model, a fusion model (two-level [C5, C6] anterior corpectomy) was developed and validated. After corpectomy, allograft interbody fusion with a rigid anterior screw-plate construct was created from C4 to C7. Five additional FE models were developed from the fusion model corresponding to five different combinations of screw angulations within the vertebral bodies (C4, C7): (0 degrees, 0 degrees), (5 degrees, 5 degrees), (10 degrees, 10 degrees), (15 degrees, 15 degrees), and (15 degrees, 0 degrees). The fifth fusion model was termed as a hybrid fusion model. RESULTS: The stability of a two-level corpectomy reconstruction is not dependent on the position of the screws. Despite the locked screw-plate interface, some degree of load sharing is transmitted to the graft. The load seen by the graft and the shear stress at the bone-screw junction is dependent on the angle of the screws with respect to the end plate. Higher stresses are seen at more divergent angles, particularly at the lower level of the construct. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that screw divergence from the end plates not only increases load transmission to the graft but also predisposes the screws to higher shear forces after corpectomy reconstruction. In particular, the inferior screw demonstrated larger stress than the upper-level screws. In the proposed hybrid fusion model, lower stresses on the bone graft, end plates, and bone-screw interface were recorded, inferring lower construct failure (end-plate fractures and screw pullout) potential at the inferior construct end.


Subject(s)
Bone Plates , Bone Screws , Bone Transplantation/instrumentation , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Finite Element Analysis , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Adult , Bone Transplantation/methods , Computer Simulation , Equipment Failure Analysis , Female , Humans , Internal Fixators , Models, Biological , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods , Stress, Mechanical , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery
8.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 34(7): 680-6, 2009 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19333099

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between clinical radiographic findings and sagittal range of motion (ROM) measured using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Evaluation of fusion after ACDF continues to be difficult. Radiographic films including flexion/extension views are routinely used for this purpose. Unfortunately, routine radiographs are insensitive in demonstrating pseudarthrosis. RSA is an accurate technique that can be used in evaluation of segmental motion in vivo and can potentially be used in evaluation of spinal fusion. METHODS: Sixteen patients who underwent multi-level ACDF were enrolled in this study. The procedure was performed in the routine fashion; cervical plates were utilized in each case. Intraoperatively, 3 to 5 tantalum beads were inserted into each vertebral body. At the 1-year follow-up period, sagittal ROM of the operated segments was measured with RSA. In addition, each segment was clinically evaluated for evidence of radiographic fusion by using a 3-point grading system (fused, uncertain, pseudarthrosis) and by measuring the interspinous widening on flexion/extension films. The correlation between the radiographic findings and RSA measured sagittal ROM was evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen 2-level and two 3-level procedures representing 31 motion segments were analyzed. The average sagittal ROM of all segments as measured by RSA was 1.3 +/- 1.4 degrees . The sagittal ROM of the segments with less than 2 mm of interspinous widening on clinical flexion/extension radiographs was measured at 1.1 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees with RSA, whereas the sagittal ROM of the segments with greater than 2 mm of interspinous widening was measured at 3.4 degrees +/- 2.9 degrees ; a significant correlation was noted between the 2-point grading method and the sagittal ROM (Pearson coefficient, r = 0.504, P = 0.004). Using the 3-point grading system, there were 20 levels graded as fused (0.8 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees ), 6 levels were graded as uncertain (1.7 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees ), and 4 levels were graded as pseudarthrosis (3.5 degrees +/- 2.7 degrees ). The pseudarthrosis group showed significantly greater motion than the fusion group (P = 0.005); a significant correlation was noted between the 3-point grading method and the sagittal ROM (Pearson coefficient, r = 0.561, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, we evaluated the utility of RSA in evaluating segmental motion after ACDF and demonstrated a significant difference between segments that demonstrated radiographic evidence of fusion when compared with segments that demonstrated evidence of pseudarthrosis. RSA appears to be a quantitative technique capable of assisting in the evaluation of fusion.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Diskectomy/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Radiology/methods , Spinal Fusion/methods , Adult , Aged , Anthropometry/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/anatomy & histology , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnostic imaging , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/pathology , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Care/methods , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Pseudarthrosis/diagnostic imaging , Pseudarthrosis/etiology , Pseudarthrosis/pathology , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Spondylosis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylosis/pathology , Spondylosis/surgery , Titanium , Wound Healing/physiology
9.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 21(6): 400-5, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18679093

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan in predicting endplate strength. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate a correlation between the cervical trabecular bone density and the failure strength of the endplate. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical total disc arthroplasty devices have to transmit the force to the endplate for the remainder of the patients' life. One potential complication at this interface is endplate fracture and implant subsidence, which usually occurs early postoperatively and may be related to weakness of the boney endplate. METHODS: Six fresh human cadaver cervical spines were harvested and scanned for the determination of trabecular density using a peripheral quantitative CT (QCT) scanner. The specimens were then disarticulated and the inferior endplate of each vertebral segment was biomechanically tested using a 2-mm indentation probe to determine average endplate strength. The superior endplate of each vertebral body was then fitted with the appropriately sized ProDisc-C endplate and biomechanically tested until failure. Regression analyses were used to compare the interface failure stress of the implant with the bone mineral content and the average endplate stress as measured with the indentation probe. RESULTS: The average bone mineral content of the specimens was 322+/-57 mg/cm. The average endplate strength and stress measured by the indentation test was 176+/-129 N and 56+/-34 N/mm, respectively. The average ProDisc-C/endplate failure load and failure stress were 1875+/-1023 N and 10.2+/-4.1 N/mm, respectively. There was a direct correlation between the ProDisc-C/endplate failure stress and the bone mineral content measured by peripheral QCT (R=0.48, P<0.01). There was also a significant correlation between ProDisc-C/endplate failure stress and the endplate indentation stress. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the utility of a preoperative QCT scan in predicting the failure stress of the cervical endplate before total disc replacement. This information may potentially decrease early complications of device subsidence or endplate fracture.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/physiology , Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Compressive Strength/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Plates , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
10.
SAS J ; 2(1): 9-15, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25802596

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many clinical studies have focused on clinical pain scores and less on kinematics following intervertebral disc replacement. Although flexion and extension of the motion segment can be measured on lateral X-rays, measuring lateral bending and axial rotation of the device is extremely difficult on plain radiography. This study was designed to measure, using radiostereometric analysis (RSA), the postoperative range of motion of the spinal segment following placement of ProDisc-L interbody device (Synthes Spine, West Chester, Pennsylvania). METHODS: Twelve patients (15 discs) with a ProDisc-L intervertebral disc replacement were followed postoperatively at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months with both clinical and RSA examinations. For follow-up RSA analysis, 4 to 5 tantalum beads were inserted into the vertebrae adjacent to the surgical level during surgery. Standing biplanar films were collected during follow-up, and the ranges of motion (ROM) (sagittal and coronal bending) of the adjacent vertebrae were determined by RSA. RESULTS: Based on the clinical surveys, this group of patients had similar outcomes compared to larger clinical populations. The flexion/extension ROM with the disc replacement averaged 2.5° at 6 weeks and increased over the follow-up period to 6.6° at 6 months. The lateral bending ROM with the disc replacement remained consistent over the 4 time points and averaged 3.0°. The motion at the level of the L4-5 vertebrae following disc replacement was greater across all time points than the motion at the L5-S1 level for both sagittal (5.9° versus 2.1°) and coronal (4.2° versus 0.6°) bending. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the amount of RSA-measured segmental flexion/extension ROM for those with disc replacement was similar to other studies using plain radiography. In lateral bending, the amount of motion with disc replacement was less than the typical 6°-16° reported for normal ROM. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This is the first published study evaluating the in vivo kinematics of artificial disc replacement using RSA.

11.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 32(17): 1852-5, 2007 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17762292

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro biomechanical study. OBJECTIVES: This biomechanical study was designed to evaluate the loss of endplate integrity with incremental removal of the endplate. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The position of the anterior cervical motion preserving prosthesis is very important. Unlike interbody bone graft, where a certain amount of settling is tolerable and potentially advantageous with respect to the fusion rate, a settled total disc replacement will not function properly and may dislodge. Partial or aggressive endplate removal may be a factor resulting in subsidence of an interbody device. This study was designed to precisely examine the change of endplate strength following precise burring of the surface. METHODS: Eight human cadaver cervical spines (C3-C7) were dissected and 6 locations on the endplates from each vertebra were biomechanically tested using an indentation test protocol. Pairs of locations were randomly assigned to be burred to the depth of 0 mm (intact), 1 mm, or 2 mm before the testing using a flat 3-mm end mill. Strength of the endplate was statistically analyzed to examine the effect of the depth of the burr and any regional variations. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.0001) in endplate strength was noted between the intact endplate (106 +/- 86 N) and burred endplates (1 mm depth, 59 +/- 49 N; 2 mm depth, 51 +/- 46 N). No significant differences existed between the burr depths of 1 and 2 mm (P = 0.21). The posterior endplate was significantly stronger than the anterior endplate irrespective of depth of burr. CONCLUSION: There is a significant loss of endplate integrity when 1 mm of endplate (44% loss) or 2 mm of endplate (52% loss) is removed. Although the implant interface plays an important role in the magnitude of the subsidence of a device, this study in general shows that the endplate is important in terms of maximizing the strength of a construct.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/physiology , Diskectomy/methods , Intervertebral Disc/physiology , Spinal Fusion/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bone Density , Cadaver , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Compressive Strength , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Movement
12.
Eur Spine J ; 16(12): 2104-9, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17712574

ABSTRACT

Cervical interbody device subsidence can result in screw breakage, plate dislodgement, and/or kyphosis. Preoperative bone density measurement may be helpful in predicting the complications associated with anterior cervical surgery. This is especially important when a motion preserving device is implanted given the detrimental effect of subsidence on the postoperative segmental motion following disc replacement. To evaluate the structural properties of the cervical endplate and examine the correlation with CT measured trabecular bone density. Eight fresh human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were CT scanned and the average trabecular bone densities of the vertebral bodies (C3-C7) were measured. Each endplate surface was biomechanically tested for regional yield load and stiffness using an indentation test method. Overall average density of the cervical vertebral body trabecular bone was 270 +/- 74 mg/cm3. There was no significant difference between levels. The yield load and stiffness from the indentation test of the endplate averaged 139 +/- 99 N and 156 +/- 52 N/mm across all cervical levels, endplate surfaces, and regional locations. The posterior aspect of the endplate had significantly higher yield load and stiffness in comparison to the anterior aspect and the lateral aspect had significantly higher yield load in comparison to the midline aspect. There was a significant correlation between the average yield load and stiffness of the cervical endplate and the trabecular bone density on regression analysis. Although there are significant regional variations in the endplate structural properties, the average of the endplate yield loads and stiffnesses correlated with the trabecular bone density. Given the morbidity associated with subsidence of interbody devices, a reliable and predictive method of measuring endplate strength in the cervical spine is required. Bone density measures may be used preoperatively to assist in the prediction of the strength of the vertebral endplate. A threshold density measure has yet to be established where the probability of endplate fracture outweighs the benefit of anterior cervical procedure.


Subject(s)
Bone Density/physiology , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Preoperative Care/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Plates/adverse effects , Bone Plates/standards , Bone Screws/adverse effects , Bone Screws/standards , Cadaver , Cervical Vertebrae/pathology , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Prostheses and Implants/standards , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Weight-Bearing/physiology
14.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 17(5): 367-71, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15385875

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Transpedicular instrumentation of the thoracic spine is potentially dangerous because of the close proximity of vital structures and the morphologic variability seen. Computed tomography has become the gold standard in evaluating the position of thoracic pedicle screws in vivo. Unfortunately, despite its common use, the accuracy of computed tomography has not been adequately investigated. The objective of this work was to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography in evaluating the position of thoracic pedicle screws. METHODS: One hundred ninety-four thoracic pedicles in nine cadaveric specimens were instrumented and evaluated postoperatively with computed tomography and open dissection. Computed tomography films were assessed by three blinded observers who noted the position of each pedicle screw on two separate occasions. These data were subsequently compared with the open dissection data. RESULTS: Computed tomography was found to be 76 +/- 16% sensitive and 75 +/- 13% specific when compared with open dissection. Overall accuracy was 76 +/- 8%. Intraobserver accuracy was 79 +/- 5% in assessing thoracic pedicle screws by computed tomography. Fair to moderate degree of agreement was demonstrated for both interobserver and intraobserver data using kappa values. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography was found to be relatively insensitive in assessing thoracic pedicle screw position. In the face of postoperative complications, surgical exploration and hardware removal may still be necessary despite negative computed tomography.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws/standards , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Tomography, Spiral Computed/standards , Bone Screws/adverse effects , Cadaver , Dissection/standards , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/etiology , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Observer Variation , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Spinal Cord Injuries/etiology , Spinal Cord Injuries/prevention & control , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology
15.
J Spinal Disord Tech ; 17(5): 439-41, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15385885

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Isolated spinous process fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine are not well described in the literature. Initial conservative treatment of these fractures can result in resolution of symptoms without lasting effect. However, in cases where localized pain persists despite appropriate treatment, pseudoarthrosis should be suspected. METHODS: The diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcome of one patient with isolated pseudoarthrosis of the lumbar spine that failed conservative treatment and was surgically excised are reviewed. RESULTS: Following excision of the spinous process pseudoarthrosis, the patient's pain resolved, allowing return to competitive sports without limitation. CONCLUSIONS: In certain cases, excision of an isolated spinous process pseudoarthrosis can improve patients' back pain. However, prior to surgery, conservative treatment must be exhausted and other causes of back pain must be ruled out.


Subject(s)
Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Pseudarthrosis/etiology , Pseudarthrosis/surgery , Spinal Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Adolescent , Humans , Low Back Pain/etiology , Low Back Pain/surgery , Male , Orthopedics , Pseudarthrosis/diagnosis , Spinal Fractures/diagnosis , Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...