Effect of Chronic Low Back Pain on Lumbar Spine Lordosis During Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate lumbar lordosis during sit-to-stand (STS) and stand-to-sit (SIT) in individuals with and without chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP). The second objective was to investigate sex-related differences in lumbar lordosis. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with CNLBP and 26 controls were recruited. Controls were matched with cases using a frequency matching method. Reflective markers were placed over the spinous process of T12, L3, S2, and the anterior and posterior superior iliac spines. The participants were instructed to stand up at a self-selected pace and maintain their normal upright standing posture for 3 seconds, and then sit down. Kinematic data were recorded at a sampling frequency of 100 Hz using a motion capture system. Lumbar lordosis angle was calculated from the intersection between the line joining T12 and L3, and the line joining L3 to S2. RESULTS: Lumbar lordosis was decreased in patients with CNLBP during STS and SIT compared with the asymptomatic group (mean difference = 2.68°-9.32°; P ≤ .005). Furthermore, no differences were seen in lumbar lordosis at starting position between CNLBP and asymptomatic groups during STS and SIT (mean difference = 2.68°-3.75°; P ≥ .099). Interestingly, the magnitude of the effect size suggested that the difference in lumbar lordosis values between female and male participants was relatively large (Cohen's d = -1.81 to 0.20). CONCLUSION: Decreased lumbar lordosis in patients with CNLBP during STS and SIT could be considered as an important point during rehabilitation. Moreover, the present study showed that there is a sex-related difference among women and men in lumbar lordosis during STS and SIT tasks.

The Effect of Core Stabilization Exercises on Trunk-Pelvis Three-Dimensional Kinematics During Gait in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Controlled clinical trial study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of core stabilization exercise program (CSEP) on trunk-pelvis kinematics during gait in non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: NCLBP is a major public burden with variety of dysfunction including gait variability. METHODS: Thirty participants (15 NCLBP and 15 healthy) were included in this study via the convenience sampling method. NCLBP group were intervened via the 16 sessions CSEP 3 days for 6 weeks and trunk-pelvis kinematics (angular displacement, waveform pattern [CVp], and offset variability [CVo]) during gait, pain, disability were evaluated before and after the intervention. RESULTS: No significant differences in displacement and CVo in three planes were found between NCLBP and healthy groups. Independent t test was revealed that significant differences in CVp in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes were found between healthy and NCLBP in pre intervention. No significant changes in displacement and CVo were found as the result of intervention in NCLBP. Pain and disability decreased significantly after intervention. Paired t test revealed that the CSEP increased the frontal (P = 0.04) and transverse planes (P = 0.02) pattern variability significantly. However, there was a significant difference between groups in the sagittal plane CVp after intervention (sagittal plane CVp in healthy vs. NCLBP in post-CSE: mean difference = 14.1; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Considering the role of the deep trunk muscles in gait, and their common deconditioning in CLBP, a CSEP intervention may increase trunk-pelvis kinematic pattern variability. These results suggest CSEP may specifically increase transverse and frontal plane variability, indicating improved motor pattern replication through this movement planes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Effect of ankle taping on postural control measures during grasp and release task in patients with chronic ankle instability.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of Mulligan ankle taping on center of pressure (COP) parameters during performance of a functional upper limb task in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). METHODS: A clinical controlled trial study designed between 4 ankle conditions: untaped and taped, CAI and healthy subjects. Fifteen subjects with CAI and 15 healthy controls were asked to grasp an object at their waist level and release it above shoulder level in an oblique pattern during performance of single-leg stance balance test. All the subjects performed 3 trials of single-leg stance with eyes opened before and after Mulligan taping on a force plate during performance of functional upper limb task. The mean displacement (mdCOP), range of COP excursion (rangeCOP) and average speed of COP (velCOP) in anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) directions were analysed for differences between groups. RESULTS: mdCOP and rangeCOP in AP direction were significantly increased (P= 0.04 and 0.03, respectively) in the CAI group. Mulligan taping significantly reduced velCOP in AP and ML directions (P= 0.02). CONCLUSION: In CAI patients Mulligan ankle taping can improve postural control by decreasing velCOP, therefore Mulligan taping can have immediate positive effects on postural parameters and maintenance of dynamic postural control.

What is the effect and mechanism of kinesiology tape on muscle activity?

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of kinesiology tape, anesthesia, and kinesiology tape along with anesthesia, on motor neuron excitability. PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 20 healthy men aged 20-35 years, who were examined over 5 sessions. INTERVENTION: The five experimental sessions included: control without applying the kinesiology tape or Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics (EMLA); treatment only with EMLA; only kinesiology tape application; only sham tape application; and treatment with kinesiology tape and EMLA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The H-reflex recruitment curve of the soleus and lateral gastrocnemius was recorded by a blinded assessor in the 5 separate sessions randomly assigned with 48 h washout periods. The major H-reflex parameters include: the Hmax/Mmax ratio, the H-reflex threshold stimulation intensity (Hth), the intensity of maximum H-reflex (IntensityHmax), the H-reflex ascending slope (Hslp), and the H-reflex ascending slope fixed into the first three points (first Hslp). RESULTS: The H-reflex parameters (H slope, first Hslp, Hth, and IntensityHmax) were facilitated by application of the kinesiology tape with and without EMLA; however, EMLA inhibited the H-reflex parameters (Hmax/Mmax ratio, Hslp, first Hslp, and Hth) in both the soleus and lateral gastrocnemius. The sham tape did not alter the H-reflex recruitment curve parameters. The statistical model revealed a significant difference between the kinesiology tape and the sham tape and control sessions, between kinesiology tape-EMLA and EMLA, and between kinesiology tape-EMLA and control session. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the kinesiology tape facilitates the muscle activity and the underlying mechanism on the gastrosoleus motor neuron pool involves the cutaneous receptors.