Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 24(5): 432-438, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28365188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Residents must balance patient care and the ongoing acquisition of medical knowledge. With increasing clinical responsibilities and patient overload, medical training is often left aside. In 2010, we designed and implemented a training course in neonatology and pediatric emergency medicine for residents in pediatrics, in order to improve their medical education. The course was made of didactic sessions and several simulation-based seminars for each year of residency. We conducted this study to assess the impact of our program on residents' satisfaction and self-assessed clinical skills. METHODS: A survey was conducted at the end of each seminar. The students were asked to complete a form on a five-point rating scale to evaluate the courses and their impact on their satisfaction and self-assessed clinical skills, following the French National Health Institute's adapted Kirkpatrick model. RESULTS: Sixty-four (84%) of the 76 residents who attended the courses completed the form. The mean satisfaction score for the entire course was 4.78±0.42. Over 80% of the students felt that their clinical skills had improved. CONCLUSION: Medical education is an important part of residency training. Our training course responded to the perceived needs of the students with consistently satisfactory evaluations. Before the evaluation of the impact of the course on patient care, further studies are needed to assess the acquisition of knowledge and skills through objective evaluations.


Subject(s)
Curriculum , Internship and Residency , Neonatology/education , Pediatric Emergency Medicine , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , France , Humans , Program Evaluation , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24179114

ABSTRACT

This paper has been retracted because it contained errors in the data extraction and analyses that affect the results, figures and tables. Data from a study that had been published in two different journal articles were included twice in the analyses. There was an error in the description of the measures used for neurodevelopmental testing in the reporting of the results.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...