Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 29(8): 522.e1-522.e5, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37271343

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has deeply impacted hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) donation and transplantation. Numerous changes in practice have been introduced, and monitoring the impact of these changes on donations and transplantations is of vital importance. As part of a global response to this pandemic, the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA) asked that its member registries and cord blood banks submit SARS-CoV-2-related adverse events to the WMDA-operated Serious Product Events and Adverse Reactions (SPEAR) database. Here we review SARS-CoV-2-related SPEAR events that occurred in 2020. The WMDA SPEAR Committee reviewed reports submitted via an online tool. The Committee reviewed each report following the European Union definitions of a serious adverse event or reaction and determined the imputability and its impact. Reports submitted in 2020 were included in this analysis. A TOTAL OF: 74 such reports were received, and events were classified as donor-related (n = 41; 55.4%), recipient-related (n = 3; 4.1%), technical issues (n = 31; 41.8%), or transport-related issues (n = 4; 5.4%). Five cases appeared in multiple categories. The most frequently reported adverse events were of cells being unused. Many of these cases were caused by the uncoupling of the donation and transplantation consequent on the cryopreservation of products, as well as technical issues related to cell viability. Experience in some registries suggests that these issues have become less frequent as transplantation centers have become used to the changes in practice. Lessons learned include the importance of confirming recipient eligibility before the start of donor mobilization or collection and of minimizing the time between cell collection and transplantation. Transplantation centers should familiarize themselves with the expected cell losses when peripheral blood stem cell and bone marrow products are cryopreserved and should have validated viability assays in place for quality assurance. Reassuringly, there were no reports of donors becoming severely unwell because of G-CSF or transmission of SARS-CoV-2 to recipients and only 1 report of complete failure of transport of a donation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Bone Marrow , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cells
2.
Lancet Haematol ; 9(8): e605-e614, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35901845

ABSTRACT

The contribution of related donors to the globally rising number of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCT) remains increasingly important, particularly because of the growing use of haploidentical HSCT. Compared with the strict recommendations on the suitability for unrelated donors, criteria for related donors allow for more discretion and vary between centres. In 2015, the donor outcome committee of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (WBMT) proposed consensus recommendations of suitability criteria for paediatric and adult related donors. This Review provides updates and additions to these recommendations from a panel of experts with global representation, including the WBMT, the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation donor outcome committee, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research donor health and safety committee, the US National Marrow Donor Program, and the World Marrow Donor Association, after review of the current literature and guidelines. Sections on the suitability of related donors who would not qualify as unrelated donors have been updated. Sections on communicable diseases, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, paediatric aspects including psychological issues, and reporting on serious adverse events have been added. The intention of this Review is to support decision making, with the goal of minimising the medical risk to the donor and protecting the recipient from transmissible diseases.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Child , Consensus , Humans , Transplantation, Homologous , Unrelated Donors
4.
Cell Tissue Bank ; 22(2): 191-197, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32902671

ABSTRACT

Annually more than 21,000 volunteer unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donations are performed worldwide for patients with life-threatening diseases such as acute leukaemia. Donor safety issues and donor protection is one of the top priorities for the international cooperation of unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donor registries represented by the World Marrow Donor Association (WMDA). With this new global reporting system for serious events and adverse reactions (S(P)EARs), the WMDA aims to become the global leading online platform for hematopoietic stem cell donor organisations to report their S(P)EARs from both unrelated and family donors. Software developer Cogapp developed the platform using a Knack environment based on requirements of experienced reporters and reviewers. On July 1st WMDA launched a robust online reporting system for S(P)EARs in order to provide accurate information about potential risks to donors. The collected data about S(P)EARs occurring in donors will be analysed and used to provide statistics on the type of reports being submitted and to put in place best practices to mitigate such effects and occurrences. Via the annual S(P)EAR reports the results will be disseminated worldwide.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cells , Humans , Registries , Tissue Donors , Transplantation, Homologous
5.
J Clin Apher ; 32(6): 397-404, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28139098

ABSTRACT

Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) used for allogeneic transplantation are collected by apheresis after pre-treatment of donors with G-CSF. Using modern apheresis devices stem cells can be collected more efficiently. It was studied whether collection on the 4th instead of the 5th day after initiation of G-CSF treatment might be feasible. Stem cell yields that could have been collected on day 4 were calculated in two cohorts treated with 10 µg/kg G-CSF once daily (n = 106, cohort I) or 5 µg/kg twice daily schedule (n = 85, cohort II). Harvests were predicted using the median collection efficiency (CE) of the apheresis machine and regarded successful when > 5.0 x106 CD34+/ kg recipient body weight. Successful harvests at day 4 could have been obtained in only 22.6% and 41.2% of donors in cohort I and II respectively, while the expected successful collections on day 5 were 55.7% and 76.5%. Individual donor factors that correlated with a successful harvest on day 4 were weight, BMI, age, ratio donor/recipient weight and total G-CSF dose in cohort I, whereas ratio donor/recipient weight was the only significant predictor in cohort II. Donor weight, BMI and total G-CSF dose correlated positively with CD34+ values in the blood on day 4 in all donors. However, donor characteristics were not able to be used as strong predictors in daily practice. In conclusion, PBSC collection on day 4 will not result in a successful harvest in most stem cell donors, however using a twice daily G-CSF scheme increases the yield.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/methods , Peripheral Blood Stem Cells/cytology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antigens, CD34/analysis , Blood Donors , Body Mass Index , Body Weight , Female , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization/standards , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult
6.
Transplantation ; 100(6): 1329-31, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27136264

ABSTRACT

More than 12 000 volunteer unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donations are undertaken annually, and the World Marrow Donor Association established an expert committee to examine all reports of adverse events affecting donors globally, eventually making such reporting a necessary part of World Marrow Donor Association accreditation. The committee evaluates and responds to reported events in a nonpunitive confidential process designed to alert the community of rare events which might be missed by local follow-up. Each report is evaluated by the committee for imputability (causal link between the donation and the adverse event) and compared with that submitted by the reporting registry. In 2014, there were 50 reports received from 16 different registries in 15 countries. There were 16 reports of malignancies arising in donors including 3 hematologic malignancies. All but 2 of the 16 occurred more than a year after donation. There were 4 reports of autoimmune phenomena in donors all occurring more than a year postdonation. Of the 30 remaining events, 6 were allergic, 4 cardiac, 3 gastrointestinal, 2 infections, 2 pulmonary, and 13 miscellaneous. Causation was assessed differently to the reporting registry in 17 events with 6 thought to be less likely causally linked to the donation and 10 more likely with 1 requiring more information. Volunteer unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation is a safe and effective altruistic contribution to the treatment of patients with life-threatening hematologic disorders. A decade of detailed examination of adverse donor events has contributed to the safety of these donations.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Diseases/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hematopoietic Stem Cells/cytology , Living Donors , Patient Safety , Humans , Registries , Risk , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
7.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 21(12): 2052-2060, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26271194

ABSTRACT

The number of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplants performed globally each year continues to increase. Advances in HLA typing, better supportive care, and administration of reduced-intensity conditioning regimens allow treatment of older patients with older sibling donors. Pretransplant donor assessment and testing are very important processes affecting the quality and safety of donation. For unrelated HSC donors detailed recommendations for health assessment have been published, allowing donation only if they are unrestrictedly healthy. Eligibility criteria for related donors are less strict and vary significantly between centers. In situations where a family donor does not meet the suitability criteria for unrelated donors, involved physicians often struggle with the decision whether the matched relative is suitable for donation or not. On behalf of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Standing Committee on Donor Issues, we intended to develop a consensus document with recommendations for donor workup and final clearance of family donors who would not be able to serve as unrelated donors because of their age or pre-existing diseases. This article covers different topics intending to support decision-making, with the goal of minimizing medical risk to the donor and protection of the recipient from transmissible diseases.


Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Transplantation/methods , Clinical Decision-Making/ethics , Health Status , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Unrelated Donors , Advisory Committees , Age Factors , Consensus , Hematologic Neoplasms/immunology , Hematologic Neoplasms/pathology , Histocompatibility Testing , Humans , Informed Consent , International Cooperation , Risk , Siblings , Transplantation Conditioning , Transplantation, Homologous
8.
Chimerism ; 5(2): 56-8, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24933732

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a widely applied treatment for disorders mainly involving the hematopoietic system. The success of this treatment depends on many different patient- and donor-specific factors. Based on higher CD34+ yields and superior clinical outcomes associated with the use of male donors, males are generally seen as the preferred HSCT donor. In addition, female donors are notorious for bearing memory type lymphocytes induced by previous pregnancies; such alloimmune cells may provoke unwanted immune reactions such as graft-vs.-host disease in transplant recipients. Consequently, many transplant centers try to avoid parous donors, particularly when searching the best unrelated donor for a male patient. We recently showed that parous women with female offspring have an anti-male directed tolerogenic immune status comparable to that of nulliparous donors. As discussed in this article addendum, the sex of the donor's offspring combined with the presence of HY-specific T regulator cells are possibly better selection criteria than parity status per se.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Histocompatibility , Parity , Tissue Donors , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Humans , Male , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...