ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Broadly available digital and mobile health applications (also known as mHealth) have recently gained increasing attention by the vascular community, but very little is known about the dissemination and acceptance of such technologies in certain target populations. The current study aimed to determine the user behaviour and acceptance of such digital technologies amongst patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of consecutively treated inpatients at 12 university institutions, as well as one non-university institution, was conducted. All admitted patients with symptomatic PAD were surveyed for 30 consecutive days within a flexible timeframe between 1 July and 30 September 2021. The factors associated with smartphone use were estimated via backward selection within a logistic regression model with clustered standard errors. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients participated (response rate 96.3%), thereof 102 (34.0%) were treated for intermittent claudication (IC, 29.2% women, 70 years in median) and 198 were treated for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI, 29.5% women, 70 years in median). Amongst all of the patients, 46.6% stated that they had not changed their lifestyle and health behaviour since the index diagnosis (four years in median), and 33.1% responded that they were not aware of the reasons for all of their medication orders. Amongst all those surveyed, 66.8% owned a smartphone (IC: 70.6%, CLTI: 64.1%), thereof 27.9% needed regular user support. While 42.5% used smartphone apps, only 15.0% used mobile health applications, and 19.0% owned wearables. One out of five patients agreed that such technologies could help to improve their healthy lifestyle. Only higher age was inversely associated with smartphone possession. CONCLUSIONS: The current survey showed that smartphones are prevalent amongst patients with peripheral arterial disease, but only a small proportion used mobile health applications and a considerable number of patients needed regular user support. Almost half of the patients did not change their lifestyle and one third were not aware of the reasons for their medication orders, emphasising room for improvement. These findings can further help to guide future projects using such applications to identify those target populations that are reachable with digital interventions.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic disease of the lower extremity arteries (PAD) remains a significant burden on global healthcare systems with increasing prevalence. Various guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PAD are available but they often lack a sufficient evidence base for high-grade recommendations since randomized and controlled trials (RCT) remain rare or are frequently subject to conflicts of interest. This registry trial aims to evaluate the outcomes of catheter-based endovascular revascularisations vs. open-surgical endarterectomy vs. bypass surgery for symptomatic PAD on medical and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN: The study is a prospective non-randomized multicentre registry trial including invasive revascularisations performed in 10 000 patients treated for symptomatic PAD at 30 to 40 German vascular centres. All patients matching the inclusion criteria are consecutively included for a recruitment period of six months (between May and December 2018) or until 10 000 patients have been included in the study registry. There are three follow-up measures at three, six, and 12 months. Automated completeness and plausibility checks as well as independent site visit monitoring will be performed to assure high internal and external validity of the study data. Study endpoints include relevant major cardiovascular and limb events and patient-reported outcomes from two Delphi studies with experts in vascular medicine and registry-based research. DISCUSSION: It remains unclear if results from RCT can reflect daily treatment practice. Furthermore, great costs and complexity make it challenging to accomplish high quality randomized trials in PAD treatment. Prospective registry-based studies to collect real-world evidence can help to overcome these limitations.
Subject(s)
Endarterectomy , Endovascular Procedures , Ischemia/surgery , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Research Design , Vascular Grafting , Critical Illness , Endarterectomy/adverse effects , Endarterectomy/mortality , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Germany , Humans , Ischemia/diagnosis , Ischemia/mortality , Ischemia/physiopathology , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Peripheral Arterial Disease/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Grafting/adverse effects , Vascular Grafting/mortalityABSTRACT
Due to the paucity of independent trials, practical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) contain several recommendations developed by expert consensus. Furthermore, there is a lack of commonly defined quality indicators and valid data on real world treatment. Therefore, it remains challenging to scrutinize if treatment reality is conforming to guideline recommendations. This article aims to give a short overview on existing guideline recommendations. It further aims to introduce the multistage multimethodological IDOMENEO study, utilizing primary registry data (GermanVasc) and health insurance claims data (BARMER) in PAD treatment.
