Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
Endosc Int Open ; 12(2): E324-E331, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38420150

ABSTRACT

Background and study aims The Bethesda ERCP Skill Assessment Tool (BESAT) is a video-based assessment tool of technical endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) skill with previously established validity evidence. We aimed to assess the discriminative validity of the BESAT in differentiating ERCP skill levels. Methods Twelve experienced ERCP practitioners from tertiary academic centers were asked to blindly rate 43 ERCP videos using the BESAT. ERCP videos consisted of native biliary cannulation and sphincterotomy and were recorded from 10 unique endoscopists of various ERCP experience (from advanced endoscopy fellow to > 10 years of ERCP experience). Inter-rater reliability, discriminative validity, and internal structure validity were subsequently assessed. Results The BESAT was found to reliably differentiate between endoscopists of varying levels of ERCP experience with experienced ERCPists scoring higher than novice ERCPists in 11 of 13 (85%) instrument items. Inter-rater reliability for BESAT items ranged from good to excellent (intraclass correlation range: 0.86 to 0.93). Internal structure validity was assessed with item-total correlations ranging from 0.53 to 0.83. Conclusions Study findings demonstrate that the BESAT, a video-based ERCP skill assessment tool, has high inter-rater reliability and has discriminative validity in differentiating novice from expert ERCP skill. Further investigations are needed to determine the role of video-based assessment in improving trainee learning curves and patient outcomes.

2.
Gastrointest. endosc ; 89(6): [1075­1105], June 2019.
Article in English | BIGG - GRADE guidelines | ID: biblio-1094991

ABSTRACT

Each year choledocholithiasis results in biliary obstruction, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in a significant number of patients. The primary treatment, ERCP, is minimally invasive but associated with adverse events in 6% to 15%. This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standard of Practice (SOP) Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the endoscopic evaluation and treatment of choledocholithiasis. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was used to rigorously review and synthesize the contemporary literature regarding the following topics: EUS versus MRCP for diagnosis, the role of early ERCP in gallstone pancreatitis, endoscopic papillary dilation after sphincterotomy versus sphincterotomy alone for large bile duct stones, and impact of ERCP-guided intraductal therapy for large and difficult choledocholithiasis. Comprehensive systematic reviews were also performed to assess the following: same-admission cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis, clinical predictors of choledocholithiasis, optimal timing of ERCP vis-à-vis cholecystectomy, management of Mirizzi syndrome and hepatolithiasis, and biliary stent therapy for choledocholithiasis. Core clinical questions were derived using an iterative process by the ASGE SOP Committee. This body developed all recommendations founded on the certainty of the evidence, balance of risks and harms, consideration of stakeholder preferences, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Humans , Choledocholithiasis/complications , Choledocholithiasis/diagnosis , Endoscopy/nursing , Endoscopy/instrumentation , Endoscopy/methods , Pancreatitis/complications , Cholestasis/complications
3.
Surg Endosc ; 29(8): 2149-57, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25303921

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and endoluminal surgical techniques have evolved and allowed improvements in the methods for treating benign and malignant gastrointestinal diseases. To date, only case reports have been reported on the application of a laparo-endoscopic approach for resecting gastric submucosal tumors (SMT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and oncologic outcomes of a laparo-endoscopic transgastric approach to resect tumors that would traditionally require either a laparoscopic or open surgical approach. Herein, we present the largest single institution series utilizing this technique for the resection of gastric SMT in North America. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected patient database. Patients who presented for evaluation of gastric SMT were offered this surgical procedure and informed consents were obtained for participation in the study. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in this study between August/2010 and January/2013. Eight (8) patients (57.1 %) were female and the median age was 56 years (range 29-78). Of the 14 cases, 8 patients (57.1 %) underwent laparo-endoscopic resection of SMTs with transgastric extraction, 5 patients (35.7 %) had conversions to traditional laparoscopic surgery, and 1 patient (7.2 %) was abandoned intraoperatively. The median operative time for this cohort was 80 min (range 35-167). Ten patients (71.4 %) had GISTs, 3 (21.4 %) had leiomyomas, and 1 (7.1 %) had schwannoma. There were no intraoperative complications. Two patients had postoperative staple line bleeding that required repeat endoscopy. The median hospital stay was 1 day (range 1-6) and there were no postoperative mortalities. At 12-month follow-up visit, only one GIST patient (10 %) had tumor recurrence. CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that this surgical approach is safe and efficient in the resection of gastric SMT with transgastric extraction. This study found no intraoperative complications and optimal oncologic outcomes during the follow-up period. Minimally invasive surgical approaches are emerging as a valid and potentially better approach for resecting malignancies; however, continued investigation is underway to further validate this data.


Subject(s)
Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastroscopy , Laparoscopy , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Female , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/surgery , Humans , Leiomyoma/surgery , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neurilemmoma/surgery , Operative Time , Retrospective Studies
4.
Expert Opin Med Diagn ; 7(1): 25-35, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23530842

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cross sectional imaging is important for initial evaluation of pancreatic cancer, whereas endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) will often help better visualize, differentiate and make final tissue diagnosis. It plays an important role in the multi-disciplinary evaluation and staging of pancreatic cancer as accurate staging has significant impact on treatment decisions. AREAS COVERED: This review will cover the yield and utility of EUS and EUS FNA for diagnosis of pancreas cancer. In addition, this article reviews the utility and diagnostic yield of the non-invasive imaging modalities, including surface ultrasound, CT scan, PET CT scan and MRI. Tumor size, histology and disease processes that mimic pancreatic cancers will also be reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: The accurate diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neoplasms is essential for optimal patient management. Abdominal imaging with multidetector CT or MRI is the most important initial step in the evaluation of pancreatic cancer because they are widely available and can detect most masses and/or demonstrate dilated bile or pancreatic ducts indicative of obstruction. Endoscopic ultrasound will remain important for detecting small tumors, ruling out diseases that mimic adenocarcinoma and for obtaining tissue diagnosis with fine needle aspiration.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adenocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging , Endosonography/methods , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
5.
Dig Dis Sci ; 57(10): 2693-6, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22543845

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with malignant biliary obstruction are commonly living longer than previously due to improved oncologic therapies, often exceeding expected times of self-expanding metal stent patency. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term risk and impact of cholangitis in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical records at an academic medical center. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients had a self-expanding metal stent placed for malignant biliary obstruction. The median survival after SEMS was 214 days. Of these patients, 22 % developed at least one episode of cholangitis requiring inpatient admission, 20 % (9/45) of patients were hospitalized for cholangitis at 6 months, 40 % (8/20) at 1 year, and 75 % (3/4) at 2 years. All of the (8/8) patients receiving chemotherapy prior to hospitalization for cholangitis experienced delays in subsequent chemotherapy. Follow-up of 36 episodes of cholangitis revealed a 14 % 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cholangitis develops commonly in long-term survivors with self-expanding metal stents for malignant biliary obstruction, and is associated with delays in chemotherapy and a 14 % 30-day mortality.


Subject(s)
Bile Duct Neoplasms/therapy , Cholangitis/etiology , Cholangitis/pathology , Stents/adverse effects , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Aged , Bile Duct Neoplasms/mortality , Cholangiocarcinoma/mortality , Cholangiocarcinoma/therapy , Cholangitis/mortality , Constriction, Pathologic/mortality , Constriction, Pathologic/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...