Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
2.
Schmerz ; 32(2): 121-127, 2018 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29500628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous peripheral nerve field stimulation (sPNFS) is an established procedure for the treatment of chronic localized neuropathic pain of peripheral origin. The treatment of nummular headache primarily focuses on conservative methods with limited prospects of success. The role of sPNFS in the treatment of nummular headache has not been investigated as yet. QUESTION: Is the sPNFS an option in the management of nummular headache? MATERIALS AND METHODS: In addition to a summary of established methods in the treatment of nummular headache, sPNFS as a possible form of therapy is discussed. RESULTS: A positive effect of sPNFS in terms of the treatment of nummular headache is shown. DISCUSSION: sPNFS stimulates free subcutaneous nerves and transmits a pleasant form of paraesthesia in the area of pain. If regular conservative therapy has already been exhausted, then sPNFS might be an effective new option in the treatment of nummular headache. sPNFS is a minimally invasive and low-risk procedure. However, the high treatment cost and restrictions regarding fitness to undergo MRI are points of criticism. Further studies are needed to define its potential and role in the treatment of nummular headache.


Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Neuralgia , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation , Headache , Humans
3.
Schmerz ; 32(2): 144-152, 2018 04.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29230551

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poverty is an important problem in Germany. The health effects of poverty can lead to a higher risk of disease and the arising of chronic affections. On the other hand chronic illness may support the development and continuance of poverty. The context of chronic pain and poverty has not been analyzed so far. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the correlation between chronic pain and poverty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective manner we interviewed 20 patients with pain syndromes during our consultation hour regarding their household income. Further, data from the German Federal Statistical Office were analyzed with respect to the correlation between the incidence of a chronic pain diagnosis and household income. RESULTS: At 1546 €, the average household income of the patients studied was below the poverty level. The analyzed data showed that women suffered from chronic pain more often than men did and also had a lower income. Another economic inequality was found between Eastern and Western Germany. There was a statistically significant correlation between income and the incidence of the diagnostic codes for chronic pain (R52.1, 2, 9) for men. CONCLUSION: Our investigation showed the correlation between chronic pain and poverty. A commitment and cooperation of German medical associations and federal politics is necessary to overcome this sociopolitical issue.


Subject(s)
Income , Poverty , Female , Germany , Humans , Male , Pain , Prospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
4.
Schmerz ; 30(2): 152-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26491023

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established procedure for treatment of chronic neuropathic pain of peripheral origin. The efficacy of SCS in case of central poststroke pain (CPSP), especially thalamic pain, has not been adequately proven. OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of SCS as an extracranial neurostimulation method for the management of central pain syndrome was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, relevant pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures for central pain management were reviewed. A case of successful SCS for thalamic pain after ischemic insult is presented. Explanatory approaches of pathophysiological processes and a review of the current literature underline our results. RESULTS: In the case presented, SCS was found effective in the treatment of thalamic pain. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of SCS might be caused by segmental and supraspinal processes and collaboration of activating and inhibiting pathways. The integrity of the spinothalamic tract is mandatory. SCS is a treatment option for central pain syndrome, especially thalamic pain. Comparable studies confirm the potency of this technique. In contrast to other neuromodulation procedures spinal cord stimulation is less invasive, has a lower perioperative risk and is often less expensive. Further studies are needed to define its potential and role in the treatment of thalamic pain.


Subject(s)
Pain Management/methods , Pain/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Thalamic Diseases/physiopathology , Thalamic Diseases/therapy , Brain Ischemia/complications , Brain Ischemia/physiopathology , Brain Ischemia/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Spinothalamic Tracts/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...