Defining structural requirements for neuropeptide Y receptors using truncated and conformationally restricted analogues.

To further elucidate the minimum bioactive conformation of neuropeptide Y (NPY), a series of truncated and conformationally constrained analogues has been prepared. The synthesis and purification of these peptides was achieved using routine laboratory strategies and techniques. Parent molecules consisted of the native NPY N-terminal 1-4 and C-terminal 25-36 segments, having the residue 5-24 core replaced by either a single flexible omega-aminoalkanoic acid, or a more rigid Pro-Gly or Pro-DAla sequence which was expected to constrain a putative turn, and allow the N- and C-termini to align. Cross-linking between residues 2 and 27 through lactamization using side-chain length and chirality suggested by computer simulations, resulted in cyclo-(2/27)-des-AA7-24[Glu2,Gly6,DDpr27]NPY that exhibited very high affinity (Ki = 0.3 versus 0.3 nM for NPY) for the Y2 receptor using SK-N-BE2 human neuroblastoma cells, yet very low affinity for the Y1 receptor using SK-N-MC human neuroblastoma cells (Ki = 130 versus 2.0 nM for NPY). The added constraint resulting from bridging in this analogue as well as in others suggested that the combination of the deletion of residues 5-24 and the introduction of an internal ring produced exclusive selectivity for the Y2 receptor with little or no loss of affinity. The tolerance of structural recognition was further demonstrated as a second ring was introduced which was expected to constrain the amphiphilic alpha-helix, resulting in the full Y2 agonist dicyclo (2/27,28/32)-des-AA7-24 [Glu2,32,DAla6,DDpr27,Lys28]NPY. Improvement of Y1 binding activity was achieved only by including more residues (des-AA10-17) in the central PP-fold region, while allowing limited flexibility of the termini. Although the length of the bridge seemed to have little effect on binding potency, changes in the location of and chirality at the bridgehead resulted in analogues with different binding affinities. Combination of optimum structural modifications resulted in cyclo-(7/21)-des-AA10-18[Cys7,21]NPY, an analogue shortened by 25% but retaining comparable binding properties to that of native NPY at Y1 and Y2 receptor types (Ki = 5.1 and 1.3 nM, respectively).

Structural requirements for neuropeptide Y18-36-evoked hypotension: a systematic study.

It has been shown that NPY and select C-terminal fragments of NPY that evoke a hypotensive response upon intraarterial administration in the rat also cause mast cell degranulation and histamine release in vitro. Additionally, elevation of plasma histamine levels has been observed concomitant with the hypotensive effect of NPY and various C-terminal fragments. In order to investigate whether the hypotensive response to NPY18-36 is correlated to this observed elevation of histamine in vivo, we sought to characterize the structural requirements for each activity. We conducted a systematic replacement of each amino acid in NPY18-36 by its D-isomer. Additionally, various modifications were made to the N- or C-terminii of NPY18-36. The following rank order of potency was obtained for the hypotensive action of these analogues of NPY18-36 relative to NPY18-36. Only one analogue ([D-Tyr21]NPY18-36) exhibited significantly enhanced potency. Eleven analogues of NPY18-36, ([D-Thr32]-, [D-Arg35]-, [D-Ile31]-, [D-Leu30]-, [D-Tyr27]-, [D-Ser22]-, [D-Tyr36]-, [D-Gln34]-, [D-Asn29]-, [D-Ala23]-, and [D-Arg33]NPY18-36) were equipotent with NPY18-36. Four analogues ([D-His26]-, [D-Ile28]-, and [D-Ala18]NPY18-36 and -NPY18-27) had reduced potency (10-80%) while eight analogues ([D-Arg19]-, [D-Tyr20], [D-Leu24]-, [D-Arg25]-, [Ac-Ala18]-, [Me-Ala18]-, [desamino-Ala18]NPY18-36 and NPY18-36 free acid) failed to produce a significant hypotensive response (less than 10%) at the doses tested. The sensitivity of NPY18-36 to chiral inversion of single residues or other modifications at the N-terminus suggested the presence of a conformationally well defined N-terminal pharmacophore. Additionally, five NPY18-36 analogues were tested for elevation of plasma histamine levels. The rank order of potency ([D-Thr32]NPY18-36 = [D-Tyr21]NPY18-36 much greater than NPY18-36 greater than [D-Ala18]NPY18-36 greater than [Ac-Ala18]NPY18-36) was correlated with each analogue's potency at evoking a hypotensive response. In contrast, NPY1-36 failed to evoke an elevation in plasma histamine levels despite its hypotensive effects. Hence, we conclude that the magnitude of the hypotensive response evoked by an NPY18-36 analogue is primarily a function of its ability to elevate plasma histamine levels. However, the mechanism underlying NPY1-36-evoked hypotension appears to be different.