Prediction of anastomotic insufficiency based on the mucosal microbiome prior to colorectal surgery: a proof-of-principle study.

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a potentially life-threatening complication following colorectal cancer (CRC) resection. In this study, we aimed to unravel longitudinal changes in microbial structure before, during, and after surgery and to determine if microbial alterations may be predictive for risk assessment between sufficient anastomotic healing (AS) and AL prior surgery. We analysed the microbiota of 134 colon mucosal biopsies with 16S rRNA V1-V2 gene sequencing. Samples were collected from three location sites before, during, and after surgery, and patients received antibiotics after the initial collection and during surgery. The microbial structure showed dynamic surgery-related changes at different time points. Overall bacterial diversity and the abundance of some genera such as Faecalibacterium or Alistipes decreased over time, while the genera Enterococcus and Escherichia_Shigella increased. The distribution of taxa between AS and AL revealed significant differences in the abundance of genera such as Prevotella, Faecalibacterium and Phocaeicola. In addition to Phocaeicola, Ruminococcus2 and Blautia showed significant differences in abundance between preoperative sample types. ROC analysis of the predictive value of these genera for AL revealed an AUC of 0.802 (p = 0.0013). In summary, microbial composition was associated with postoperative outcomes, and the abundance of certain genera may be predictive of postoperative complications.

Weight-loss Endoscopy Trial (WET): a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial comparing weight loss in endoscopically implanted duodenal-jejunal bypass liners vs. intragastric balloons vs. a sham procedure.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with reduced life expectancy and various comorbidities. Surgical interventions are effective but accompanied by risk of serious complications. Less invasive endoscopic procedures mainly comprise the intragastric balloon (IB) and the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL). A randomized, sham-controlled study comparing both procedures has not been undertaken so far. METHODS: We performed a randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, controlled trial comparing weight loss in IB vs. DJBL vs. a sham procedure (2:2:1 ratio). Patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 or > 30 with obesity-related comorbidities were included. The IB was removed after 6 months and the DJBL after 12 months. Main objective was successful weight loss (>10% from baseline) 12 months after explantation of the devices. Secondary outcomes were changes in comorbidities, quality of life and complications. RESULTS: 33 patients were randomized. Recruitment has to be stopped suddenly in after the DJBL device lost its CE mark in Europe. 11 patients received DJBL, 15 IB and 7 were allocated to sham group. Blinding was feasible in all patients. Weight decreased from baseline until explantation (DJBL: 129.4±28.3kg to 107.4±16.7kg; IB: 118.3±22.8kg to 107.4±25.7kg; sham: 134.6±18.0kg to 131.2±14.3kg) but patients regained weight almost to baseline level 12 months after explantation. Only one patient in IB group reached the primary endpoint. Severe device-related complications were very rare. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic bariatric procedures failed to achieve effective weight loss 12 months after explantation of the devices. The results of this trial need to be interpreted with caution due to its early termination.

Barrett`s Esophagus in Bariatric Surgery: Regression or Progression?

INTRODUCTION: Morbid obesity is well known as a risk factor for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its related disorders such as Barrett's esophagus (BE). This study aimed to evaluate the development of BE in patients who underwent bariatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a single-center prospectively established database of obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery from 01/2012 to 12/2019, we retrospectively compared the preoperative endoscopic findings of BE to those after 1-2 years and 3-5 years following bariatric surgery. The change of BE was detected endoscopically according to Prague classification and histologically according to the British guidelines of detecting columnar epithelium on the distal esophagus. RESULTS: Among 914 obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery and received a preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), we found 119 patients (13%) with BE. A follow-up EGD was performed in 74 of the BE patients (62.2%). A total of 37 (50%) patients underwent a follow-up EGD after 1-2 years and 45 (60.8%) patients underwent it after 3-5 years. Among many clinical parameters, the surgical procedure was the only significant factor for the change of BE after bariatric surgery (p < 0.05). A regression of BE was found in 19 patients (n = 54, 35%) after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y- gastric bypass (LRYGB). Furthermore, a progression of BE was detected in six patients (n = 20, 30%) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). CONCLUSION: RYGB should be considered in obese patients with BE. Detecting BE prior to bariatric surgery may have an impact on decision-making regarding the suitable surgical bariatric procedure.

Endoscopic Bariatric Treatment with Duodenal-Jejunal Bypass Liner Improves Non-invasive Markers of Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis.

PURPOSE: People with obesity often develop non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and are at high risk of progression to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Few therapies are effective other than bariatric surgery. We therefore analyzed data from duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) patients regarding steatosis, fibrosis, and NASH. METHODS: Consecutive DJBL patients with type 2 diabetes underwent standardized assessments up to device removal at 48 weeks. These included aspartate and alanine transaminase (AST, ALT), controlled attenuation parameter (CAP, for steatosis), and liver stiffness measurement (LSM, for fibrosis). The NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), fibrosis-4 score (FIB4), and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test were also used to assess fibrosis and the Fibroscan-AST (FAST) score to assess NASH. Mixed models were used and missing data were accounted for with multiple imputation. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (18 female, mean age 55.1, mean BMI 40.2 kg/m2) were included. After 48 weeks, the change compared to baseline with 95% CI was a factor 0.74 (0.65 to 0.84) for AST, 0.63 (0.53 to 0.75) for ALT, and a difference of - 0.21 (- 0.28 to - 0.13) for FAST, all with p < 0.001. Fibrosis based on LSM, NFS, and ELF did not change whereas FIB4 exhibited slight improvement. Eight DJBL were explanted early due to device-related complications and eight complications led to hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: One year of DJBL therapy is associated with relevant improvements in non-invasive markers of steatosis and NASH, but not fibrosis, and is accompanied by a substantial number of complications. Given the lack of alternatives, DJBL deserves further attention.

Over-the-scope-clips versus standard treatment in high-risk patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial (STING-2).

OBJECTIVE: Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is managed by standard endoscopic combination therapy, but a few cases remain difficult and carry a high risk of persistent or recurrent bleeding. The aim of our study was to compare first-line over-the-scope-clips (OTSC) therapy with standard endoscopic treatment in these selected patients. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre study (NCT03331224). Patients with endoscopic evidence of acute NVUGIB and high risk of rebleeding (defined as complete Rockall Score ≥7) were included. Primary endpoint was clinical success defined as successful endoscopic haemostasis without evidence of recurrent bleeding. RESULTS: 246 patients were screened and 100 patients were finally randomised (mean of 5 cases/centre and year; 70% male, 30% female, mean age 78 years; OTSC group n=48, standard group n=52). All but one case in the standard group were treated with conventional clips. Clinical success was 91.7% (n=44) in the OTSC group compared with 73.1% (n=38) in the ST group (p=0.019), with persistent bleeding occurring in 0 vs 6 in the OTSC versus standard group (p=0.027), all of the latter being successfully managed by rescue therapy with OTSC. Recurrent bleeding was observed in four patients (8.3%) in the OTSC group and in eight patients (15.4%) in the standard group (p=0.362). CONCLUSION: OTSC therapy appears to be superior to standard treatment with clips when used by trained physicians for selected cases of primary therapy of NVUGIB with high risk of rebleeding. Further studies are necessary with regards to patient selection to identify subgroups benefiting most from OTSC haemostasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03331224.

[Interventional endoscopic treatment in acute pancreatitis]. / Interventionelle endoskopische Therapie bei akuter Pankreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Acute pancreatitis (AP) represents a frequent gastrointestinal diseases. Approximately 80% of patients have a mild course of the disease and conservative treatment is sufficient; however, 20% of patients develop a severe AP with local and systemic complications. This article focuses on the currently recommended endoscopic management of severe AP. OBJECTIVE: Classification of AP by the revised Atlanta classification and the occurrence of local or systemic complications. Summary of current evidence with respect to endoscopic management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Inspection of the current literature from specialist journals and current guidelines. RESULTS: The AP is classified as mild, moderate or severe based on systemic (hypotension, renal failure, lung failure) and/or local complications, such as acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC), peripancreatic pseudocysts (PPC), acute necrotic collections (ANC) and walled-off necrosis (WON). In recent years the staged endoscopic treatment of infected ANC, WON and PPC has become established. The initial step is the endoscopic ultrasound-guided puncture and drainage with plastic or lumen-apposing metal stents. For solid components or insufficient drainage, a transgastric endoscopic necrosectomy is recommended. The treatment of severe AP requires an interdisciplinary management in specialized centers and regular re-evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy. CONCLUSION: Interventional endoscopy has become established as the standard for treatment of severe AP.

Correction to: Preoperative Upper-GI Endoscopy Prior to Bariatric Surgery: Essential or Optional?

In the original article the name of author Matthias Blüher was incorrect. It is correct here and the original article has been corrected.

Preoperative Upper-GI Endoscopy Prior to Bariatric Surgery: Essential or Optional?

INTRODUCTION: The role of preoperative upper-gastrointestinal (GI) gastroscopy has been discussed with controversy in bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of upper-GI pathologies detected via endoscopy prior to bariatric surgery along with their clinical significance for patients' management. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our single center prospectively established database of obese patients, who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2011 to December 2017, we retrospectively analyzed the perioperative endoscopic findings along with their influence on patients' management. RESULTS: In total, 636 obese patients with median BMI (body mass index) of 49 kg/m2 [range 31-92] received an upper-GI endoscopy prior to bariatric surgery. Among the surgical procedures, laparoscopic Roux-Y-gastric bypass (72.6%; n = 462) was the most frequent operation. Endoscopically detected pathological conditions were peptic ulcer 3.5% (22/636), Helicobacter pylori (Hp) gastritis 22.4% (143/636), and gastric or duodenal polyps 6.8% (43/636). Reflux esophagitis could be detected in 139/636 patients (21.9%). Barrett's esophagus (BE) was histologically diagnosed in 95 cases (15.0%), whereas BE was suspected endoscopically in 75 cases (11.3%) only. Esophageal adenocarcinomas were detected in 3 cases (0.5%). Change of the operative strategy due to endoscopically or histologically detected pathologic findings had to be performed in 10 cases (1.6%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative upper-GI endoscopy identifies a wide range of abnormal endoscopic findings in obese patients, which may have a significant impact on decision-making, particularly regarding the most suitable bariatric procedure and the appropriate follow-up. Therefore, preoperative upper-GI endoscopy should be considered in all obese patients prior to bariatric procedure.

Endoscopic findings and outcome in caustic ingestion of acidic and alkaline agents in adults: A retrospective analysis.

Caustic ingestion in adults is a rare but potentially life-threatening problem. It remains controversial whether endoscopic findings and mortality differ between acid and alkali ingestion. We compared ingestion of these agents and evaluated prediction parameters for survival and complications.Adult patients who presented with caustic ingestion were analyzed from 2005 to 2016. Mucosal injury was graded endoscopically by Zargar's score. Age, gender, intent of ingestion, caustic agents, comorbidities, management, complications, and mortality were examined.Thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria and were divided into acid (n = 10) and alkali group (n = 21). Ingestion of alkali resulted in higher grades (≥III) of esophageal (56% vs 24%, P = .01) and stomach injuries (43% vs 13%, P = .05) and was mostly done with suicidal intent (76% vs 30%, P = .003). Patients in the alkali group received more often surgical interventions, mechanical ventilation and tracheotomy. Overall complications including Zargar's-score ≥ grade III, mediastinitis, and aspiration pneumonia were higher in alkali group but all showed no statistical significance (P = .73). Mortality (acid: 1 (10%), alkali: 4 (19%), P = .52), age, gender, comorbidities, and intensive care management did not differ significantly between the groups. Chronic renal failure and mediastinitis were promising prediction parameters for mortality but did not reach statistical significance. No independent risk factors for the development of esophageal stenosis were identified.Alkaline agents caused a higher mucosal injury severity and were more often used in suicidal intent. Mediastinitis and chronic renal failure might be potential prediction parameters for survival but need to be evaluated in larger studies.

Endoscopic full-thickness transoral outlet reduction with semicircumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness transoral outlet reduction (efTOR) is a therapeutic option to reduce a dilated gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Mucosal ablation with argon plasma coagulation (APC) is usually performed to achieve tissue adaptation. However, rupture of sutures before scarring can lead to recurrent dilatation of the GJA. Here, we describe efTOR with a semicircumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD-efTOR) as an alternative to APC-efTOR. METHODS: We enrolled 41 patients with comparable baseline characteristics (APC-efTOR 26; ESD-efTOR 15). The main objectives were reduction in the GJA diameter and in ruptured sutures. Technical success, complications, total weight loss (TWL), and percentage of total and excess weight loss (%TWL and %EWL) at 3 and 12 months, were assessed. RESULTS: ESD-efTOR resulted in significantly fewer ruptured sutures (20 % vs. 69 %; P = 0.004) and a greater reduction in the GJA (major 20 % vs. 0 %; minor 54 % vs. 37 %; no reduction 13 % vs. 58 %; P = 0.02) after 3 months. Technical efficacy, examination time, and rate of complications were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: ESD-efTOR resulted in a significantly greater reduction in the GJA diameter and a lower risk of ruptured sutures compared with APC-efTOR.

Is CO2 insufflation an amelioration of routine colonoscopy?

BACKGROUND: The insufflation of gas during colonoscopy leads to distention of the colon with abdominal discomfort and pain for the patients. Use of CO2 during endoscopy is reported to minimize abdominal discomfort during and after endoscopy. Aim of this study was to find out whether this improvement leads to decreased dosage of sedation drugs in order to improve patient's safety and satisfaction. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized and controlled study 150 Patients referred to colonoscopy were assigned to either CO2 or air insufflation. We recorded basic characteristics of colonoscopy and the amount of drugs used for sedation. Patients and investigators filled out questionnaires to record pain, abdominal bloating and flatulence. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were randomized for examination with room air, 78 patients for use of CO2. We found no difference in basic characteristics of colonoscopy (cecal intubation time and procedure time). Both groups were administered the same amount of drugs for sedation. We found only slight improvement of pain, abdominal bloating and flatulence. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed only moderate positive effects for use of CO2 during colonoscopy. We found only modest improvement of patient's comfort during and after colonoscopy. No reduced doses of drugs for sedation could be recorded.

Design of the Weight-loss Endoscopy Trial (WET): a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial comparing weight loss in endoscopically implanted duodenal-jejunal bypass liners vs. intragastric balloons vs. a sham procedure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a global problem leading to reduced life expectancy, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and many types of cancer. Even people willing to accept treatment only achieve a mean weight loss of about 5 kg using commercial weight loss programs. Surgical interventions, e.g. sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass are effective but accompanied by risk of serious complications and side effects. Less invasive endoscopic procedures mainly comprise the intragastric balloon (IB) and the duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL). To date, a randomized comparison between these devices has not been undertaken or shown to be superior to a sham procedure. METHODS: We designed a multi-center, randomized, patient and assessor-blinded, controlled trial comparing weight loss in endoscopically implanted IB vs. DJBL vs. a sham procedure. A total of 150 patients with a BMI > 35 kg/m2 or > 30 with obesity-related comorbidities and indication for proton pump inhibitors are randomized to receive either IB, DJBL or a sham gastroscopy (2:2:1 ratio). All participants undergo regular dietary consultation. The IB will be removed after 6 months, whereas the DJBL will be explanted after 12 months. All patients will receive gastroscopies at implantation and explantation of the devices or sedation without gastroscopy to maintain blinding. Main exclusion criteria are malignant diseases, peptic ulcer or previous bariatric intervention. Weight loss 12 months after explantation of the devices, changes in comorbidities, quality of life, complication rates and safety will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: This trial could help to identify the most effective and safest endoscopic device, thus determining the new standard procedure for endoscopic bariatric treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 16th January 2017. DRKS00011036. Funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).

[Dysphagia from a gastroenterologist's perspective]. / Dysphagie aus gastroenterologischer Sicht.

Swallowing disorders (dysphagia) comprise a common cause of medical consultation and are defined as a subjective sensation of difficulty or abnormality of swallowing. In the initial step, a clear differentiation of dysphagia from odynophagia and globus sensation for further diagnostic procedures is mandatory. The careful questioning of patients symptoms and complaints is often helpful for the differentiation of oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia. Oropharyngeal dysphagia is mainly caused by neurological disorders (cerebral ischemia, Parkinson's disease, dementia) or local compression of malignancies, thyroid gland or lymph nodes. In contrast, stenosis of the tubular esophagus (peptic stricture, rings and webs, diverticula, malignancies, infections) can lead to esophageal dysphagia, mostly only after ingestion of solids. Esophageal dysphagia after ingestion of solids and liquids is often caused by motility disorders of the esophagus (achalasia, hypertensive or hypercontractile esophagus). Important diagnostic procedures comprise endoscopy, barium swallow and high-resolution manometry. Overlap syndromes are frequent and need to be supervised interdisciplinary. The diagnostic algorithm and interpretation of exam results is complex. If the results are ambiguous, a reevaluation and, when appropriate, repetition of diagnostics are recommended. Whereas oropharyngeal dysphagia is treated by neurologists or ENT physicians, diagnostic and treatment of esophageal dysphagia is a challenging role for gastroenterologists.

Analysis of Wire-Guided Hemostasis Introducer for Percutaneous Therapy of Bile Duct Stones.

BACKGROUND: Bile duct stones (BDS) are usually removed via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or, if ERCP remains unsuccessful, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). However, PTCD provides limited access to large BDSs. We analyzed a modified approach of PTCD for percutaneous therapy of BDS. METHODS: We used a modified approach of PTCD with a 13-french (Fr) hemostasis introducer for transhepatic access to BDS. Short-wired balloon or basket catheter were applied for safe removal of BDS. Patient characteristics, effectiveness, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 11 patients who underwent PTCD with hemostasis introducer. BDSs were either pushed forward to the duodenum (36%) or both partly pushed and extracted via hemostasis introducer (64%). In some cases, mechanical lithotripsy was necessary (45%). Complete removal of BDS was initially achieved in 36% of patients, 45% received additional PTCD, and in 19% stent implantation was performed. Finally, all BDSs could be removed. Laboratory analysis revealed significant reduction of alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.03) and C reactive protein (p = 0.03). Complications occurred only in 1 patient with post-interventional cholangitis. CONCLUSION: Our study showed feasibility and safety of a modified PTCD with hemostasis introducer. In addition, protection of liver tissue from sharp-edged catheters and stones was achieved. Therefore, our modification revealed an innovational approach for transhepatic removal of BDS.

Epidemiology and Resistance Patterns of Bacterial and Fungal Colonization of Biliary Plastic Stents: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Plastic stents used for the treatment of biliary obstruction will become occluded over time due to microbial colonization and formation of biofilms. Treatment of stent-associated cholangitis is often not effective because of inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents or antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to assess the current bacterial and fungal etiology of stent-associated biofilms, with particular emphasis on antimicrobial resistance. METHODS: Patients with biliary strictures requiring endoscopic stent placement were prospectively enrolled. After the retrieval of stents, biofilms were disrupted by sonication, microorganisms were cultured, and isolates were identified by matrix-associated laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and/or biochemical typing. Finally, minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for various antimicrobial agents. Selected stents were further analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: Among 120 patients (62.5% males, median age 64 years) with biliary strictures (35% malignant, 65% benign), 113 double pigtail polyurethane and 100 straight polyethylene stents were analyzed after a median indwelling time of 63 days (range, 1-1274 days). The stent occlusion rate was 11.5% and 13%, respectively, being associated with a significantly increased risk of cholangitis (38.5% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001). Ninety-five different bacterial and 13 fungal species were detected; polymicrobial colonization predominated (95.8% vs. 4.2%, P<0.001). Enterococci (79.3%), Enterobacteriaceae (73.7%), and Candida spp. (55.9%) were the leading pathogens. Candida species were more frequent in patients previously receiving prolonged antibiotic therapy (63% vs. 46.7%, P = 0.023). Vancomycin-resistant enterococci accounted for 13.7%, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae with co-resistance to ciprofloxacin accounted for 13.9%, and azole-resistant Candida spp. accounted for 32.9% of the respective isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Enterococci and Candida species play an important role in the microbial colonization of biliary stents. Therefore, empirical antimicrobial treatment of stent-associated cholangitis should be guided toward enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, anaerobes, and Candida. To determine causative pathogens, an accurate microbiological analysis of the extracted stent(s) may be helpful.

Palliative Endoscopic Treatment Options in Malignancies of the Biliopancreatic System.

In most of the cases, pancreatic cancer and malignancies of the bile tract can only be treated palliatively. Endoscopy offers several methods for effective control of the symptoms in those situations. In pancreatic cancer, stenting of bile ducts enables a control of jaundice most of the time. Stenting of an obstructed duodenum can relieve symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction without the need for major surgery. In biliary tract cancer, stenting of the bile ducts can provide effective drainage of the biliary system. Photodynamic therapy and radiofrequency ablation can sometimes be a valuable tool in symptom control. This review tries to provide an overview on endoscopic palliative treatment options in pancreatic cancer and biliary tract cancer.